IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v2y2014i1p1-14d32920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dilemmas and Challenges in the Marketing of Hybrid Organizations: A Theoretical Exploration of Dutch Sheltered Work Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Lieske Van der Torre

    (Public Administration, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam 3062 PA, The Netherlands)

  • Menno Fenger

    (Public Administration, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam 3062 PA, The Netherlands)

  • Mark Van Twist

    (Public Administration, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam 3062 PA, The Netherlands
    The Netherlands School of Public Administration, Lange Voorhout 17, The Hague 2514 EB, The Netherlands)

  • Daphne Bressers

    (The Netherlands School of Public Administration, Lange Voorhout 17, The Hague 2514 EB, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This article explores the dilemmas and challenges that hybrid organizations face when developing marketing strategies. Hybrid organizations are organizations that combine tasks and characteristics of governmental organizations, private (for profit) organizations, and non-profit organizations. In this article, we show that these organizations are confronted with different target groups, organizational identities and key images. In some instances, the key messages that need to be transmitted through marketing strategies may even be incompatible. Dutch sheltered work companies are illustrative examples of hybrid organizations. They compete with temp work agencies in providing employees to employers, they provide care for people with severe disabilities and they implement the Dutch Sheltered Work Act in their role of governmental agencies. This article theoretically identifies the challenges and dilemmas that may be involved in the marketing of these diverse activities and explores strategies that may be used to overcome these challenges and dilemmas.

Suggested Citation

  • Lieske Van der Torre & Menno Fenger & Mark Van Twist & Daphne Bressers, 2014. "Dilemmas and Challenges in the Marketing of Hybrid Organizations: A Theoretical Exploration of Dutch Sheltered Work Companies," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:1-14:d:32920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/2/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/2/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claude Ménard, 2004. "The Economics of Hybrid Organizations," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 160(3), pages 345-376, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Roßner & Dimitrios Zikos, 2018. "The Role of Homogeneity and Heterogeneity Among Resource Users on Water Governance: Lessons Learnt from an Economic Field Experiment on Irrigation in Uzbekistan," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(03), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Délila Allam, 2011. "En toutes franchises : de la capacité d'obéissance à la capacité d'initiative," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00643792, HAL.
    3. Williamson, Oliver E., 2007. "Transaction Cost Economics: An Introduction," Economics Discussion Papers 2007-3, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Rosa, Franco, 2012. "Planning the Sustainable Agro-fuel Supply Chain," 2012 First Congress, June 4-5, 2012, Trento, Italy 124130, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA).
    5. Monteiro, Guilherme Fowler A. & Saes, Maria Sylvia Macchione & Caleman, Silvia Morales de Queiroz & Zylbersztajn, Décio, 2012. "The Role of Empirical Research in the Study of Complex Forms of Governance in Agroindustrial Systems," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 50(4), January.
    6. Monteiro, Guilherme Fowler A. & Saes, Maria Sylvia Macchione & Caleman, Silvia Morales de Queiroz & Zylbersztajn, Décio, 2012. "The Role of Empirical Research in the Study of Complex Forms of Governance in Agroindustrial Systems," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 50(4), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Mondelaers, Koen & Lauwers, Ludwig H. & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2011. "Food Certification Schemes as Private Institutions of Sustainability," 2011 International European Forum, February 14-18, 2011, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 121993, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    8. Riccardo Leoncini & Giulia Vecchiato & Luca Zamparini, 2020. "Triggering cooperation among firms: an empirical assessment of the Italian Network Contract Law," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 37(2), pages 357-380, July.
    9. Anna Carbone, 2018. "Foods and Places: Comparing Different Supply Chains," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, January.
    10. Radchenko, Tatiana & Shastitko, Andrei, 2013. "Regulation of trade policy of a private company: theory, practice and implications for antitrust," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, pages 81-105, October.
    11. Ietto-Gillies, Grazia & Trentini, Claudia, 2023. "Sectoral structure and the digital era. Conceptual and empirical analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 13-24.
    12. Stefano Pascucci & Cornelis Gardebroek & Liesbeth Dries, 2012. "Some like to join, others to deliver: an econometric analysis of farmers' relationships with agricultural co-operatives," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 39(1), pages 51-74, February.
    13. Pavlova, Natalia & Shastitko, Andrey, 2014. "Effects of Hostility Tradition in Antitrust: Leniency Programs and Cooperation Agreements," EconStor Preprints 122051, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    14. Evgeny Popov & Victoria Simonova, 2015. "The impact of culture on inter-firm relations in corporations," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 11(1), pages 39-52.
    15. Matthew Sveum & Michael Sykuta, 2016. "Making a Motivated Manager: A Census Data Investigation into Efficiency Differences Between Franchisee and Franchisor-Owned Restaurants," Working Papers 16-54, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    16. Antonio Nicita & Simone Sepe, 2012. "The Hold-up Problem Under Common Agency," Department of Economics University of Siena 636, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    17. Sam Garrett-Jones & Tim Turpin & Kieren Diment, 2010. "Managing competition between individual and organizational goals in cross-sector research and development centres," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 527-546, October.
    18. Fageda, Xavier & Flores-Fillol, Ricardo & Theilen, Bernd, 2019. "Hybrid cooperation agreements in networks: The case of the airline industry," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 194-227.
    19. Lo Nigro, Giovanna & Abbate, Lorenzo, 2011. "Risk assessment and profit sharing in business networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 234-241, May.
    20. Claude Ménard, 2012. "Hybrid Modes of Organization. Alliances, Joint Ventures, Networks, and Other 'Strange' Animals," Post-Print halshs-00624291, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:1-14:d:32920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.