IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v10y2021i1p2-d712772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FinTech Companies: A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Gencay Tepe

    (Faculty of Business, Manisa Celal Bayar University, 45140 Manisa, Turkey)

  • Umut Burak Geyikci

    (Faculty of Business, Manisa Celal Bayar University, 45140 Manisa, Turkey)

  • Fatih Mehmet Sancak

    (Dikkan Group, 35730 Izmir, Turkey)

Abstract

The financial-technology industry has recently attracted the attention of many sectors. The financial-technology industry designs new and unusual technological financial services in many areas. It combines technology with finance and provides an alternative to the traditional financial system. In the scope of this study, 636 publications were obtained from Scopus. Various tools, such as Microsoft Excel for frequency analysis, and VOSviewer for data visualization, were used. The open-source codes used for bibliometric analysis through the R Studio program were developed by the authors and used for citation-metrics analysis. The main aim of this study was to find out the most influential studies and authors and to reveal the distributions and impacts of publications in the FinTech area between 2015 and 2021 from the Scopus database. The results indicate that the most influential journal is Sustainability Switzerland, and the most cited author is Gomber et al. Additionally, Rabbani has the most publications, while China has emerged as the most productive country. On the other hand, this study found that FinTech research clustered in four areas. These areas are computer science, business management, economics, and social sciences. This FinTech study examines financial services, financial access, and financial technology, where FinTech is at the center. It also focuses on cryptocurrency, bitcoin, and smart contracts where the blockchain is at the center. The results reveal a systematic map of existing studies. Further, the study plays a guiding role in future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Gencay Tepe & Umut Burak Geyikci & Fatih Mehmet Sancak, 2021. "FinTech Companies: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:2-:d:712772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/10/1/2/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/10/1/2/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Albort-Morant, Gema & Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo, 2016. "A bibliometric analysis of international impact of business incubators," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1775-1779.
    2. Dugast, Jérôme & Foucault, Thierry, 2018. "Data abundance and asset price informativeness," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 367-391.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edouard Augustin Ribes, 2023. "Transforming personal finance thanks to artificial intelligence: myth or reality?," Financial Economics Letters, Anser Press, vol. 2(1), pages 11-12, April.
    2. Mohammad Sahabuddin & Md. Nazmus Sakib & Md. Mahbubur Rahman & Adamu Jibir & Mochammad Fahlevi & Mohammed Aljuaid & Sandra Grabowska, 2023. "The Evolution of FinTech in Scientific Research: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Shaojie & Su, Jingqin & Lyu, Yibo & Liu, Qing, 2022. "How do business incubators govern incubation relationships with different new ventures?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    2. Manhart, Niklas, 2022. "The Mission Comes First: Exploring the Mechanisms of Organizational Sponsorship for the Acceleration of Social Start-Ups," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 7(2), pages 289-337.
    3. Caloffi, Annalisa & Colovic, Ana & Rizzoli, Valentina & Rossi, Federica, 2023. "Innovation intermediaries' types and functions: A computational analysis of the literature," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Paulo Ferreira & Éder J.A.L. Pereira & Hernane B.B. Pereira, 2020. "From Big Data to Econophysics and Its Use to Explain Complex Phenomena," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-10, July.
    5. Zhang, Junsheng & Peng, Zezhi & Zeng, Yamin & Yang, Haisheng, 2023. "Do big data mutual funds outperform?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Deist, Maximilian K. & McDowell, William C. & Bouncken, Ricarda B., 2023. "Digital units and digital innovation: Balancing fluidity and stability for the Creation, Conversion, and Dissemination of sticky knowledge," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Vidit Mohan & Rohan Chinchwadkar, 2022. "Technology Business Incubation: A Literature Review and Gaps," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 53-63, June.
    8. Kang, Junqing & Lin, Shen & Xiong, Xiong, 2022. "What drives intraday reversal? illiquidity or liquidity oversupply?," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Nikita Jain & Deepali Virmani & Ajith Abraham, 2021. "Tsunami in the last 15 years: a bibliometric analysis with a detailed overview and future directions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 106(1), pages 139-172, March.
    10. Glebkin, Sergei & Kuong, John Chi-Fong, 2023. "When large traders create noise," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(2).
    11. Irene MALGINA, 2020. "The evolution of the entrepreneurial ecosystem in the context of the entrepreneurship support infrastructure in Belarus," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 6(2), pages 76-91, December.
    12. Xiangfei Yuan & Haijing Hao & Chenghua Guan & Alex Pentland, 2021. "What are the key components of an entrepreneurial ecosystem in a developing economy? A longitudinal empirical study on technology business incubators in China," Papers 2103.08131, arXiv.org.
    13. Jérôme Dugast & Thierry Foucault, 2020. "Equilibrium Data Mining and Data Abundance," Post-Print hal-02933315, HAL.
    14. Sagade, Satchit & Scharnowski, Stefan & Westheide, Christian, 2022. "Broker colocation and the execution costs of customer and proprietary orders," SAFE Working Paper Series 366, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    15. Alba Viana-Lora & Marta Gemma Nel-lo-Andreu, 2022. "Bibliometric analysis of trends in COVID-19 and tourism," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    16. Mercedes Rodríguez-Fernández & Juan Herrera & Carlos de las Heras-Rosas, 2021. "Model of Organizational Commitment Applied to Health Management Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Itay Goldstein & Shijie Yang & Luo Zuo, 2020. "The Real Effects of Modern Information Technologies: Evidence from the EDGAR Implementation," NBER Working Papers 27529, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. J. Piet Hausberg & Sabrina Korreck, 2020. "Business incubators and accelerators: a co-citation analysis-based, systematic literature review," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 151-176, February.
    19. Carla Martínez-Climent & Ana Zorio-Grima & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2018. "Financial return crowdfunding: literature review and bibliometric analysis," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 527-553, September.
    20. Vimbayi Grace Petrova Chimonyo & Tendai Polite Chibarabada & Dennis Junior Choruma & Richard Kunz & Sue Walker & Festo Massawe & Albert Thembinkosi Modi & Tafadzwanashe Mabhaudhi, 2022. "Modelling Neglected and Underutilised Crops: A Systematic Review of Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:2-:d:712772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.