IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v9y2012i7p2293-2311d18579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perspectives of Community- and Faith-Based Organizations about Partnering with Local Health Departments for Disasters

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Stajura

    (Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Suite 26-081, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

  • Deborah Glik

    (UCLA Health and Media Research Group, Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Suite 26-081, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

  • David Eisenman

    (UCLA Center for Public Health and Disasters, UCLA Geffen School of Medicine, Suite 26-081, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

  • Michael Prelip

    (Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Suite 26-078, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

  • Andrea Martel

    (Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Suite 26-081, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

  • Jitka Sammartinova

    (Department of Community Health Sciences, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Suite 26-081, Box 951772, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA)

Abstract

Public health emergency planners can better perform their mission if they develop and maintain effective relationships with community- and faith-based organizations in their jurisdictions. This qualitative study presents six themes that emerged from 20 key informant interviews representing a wide range of American community- and faith-based organizations across different types of jurisdictions, organizational types, and missions. This research seeks to provide local health department public health emergency planners with tools to assess and improve their inter-organizational community relationships. The themes identified address the importance of community engagement, leadership, intergroup dynamics and communication, and resources. Community- and faith-based organizations perceive that they are underutilized or untapped resources with respect to public health emergencies and disasters. One key reason for this is that many public health departments limit their engagement with community- and faith-based organizations to a one-way “push” model for information dissemination, rather than engaging them in other ways or improving their capacity. Beyond a reprioritization of staff time, few other resources would be required. From the perspective of community- and faith-based organizations, the quality of relationships seems to matter more than discrete resources provided by such ties.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Stajura & Deborah Glik & David Eisenman & Michael Prelip & Andrea Martel & Jitka Sammartinova, 2012. "Perspectives of Community- and Faith-Based Organizations about Partnering with Local Health Departments for Disasters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:7:p:2293-2311:d:18579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/7/2293/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/7/2293/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nelson, C. & Lurie, N. & Wasserman, J. & Zakowski, S., 2007. "Conceptualizing and defining public health emergency preparedness," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(S1), pages 9-11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melanie Rock & Gwendolyn Blue, 2020. "Healthy publics as multi-species matters: solidarity with people’s pets in One Health promotion," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Yubin Lee & Byung-Woo Kim & Shin-Woo Kim & Hyunjin Son & Boyoung Park & Heeyoung Lee & Myoungsoon You & Moran Ki, 2021. "Precautionary Behavior Practices and Psychological Characteristics of COVID-19 Patients and Quarantined Persons," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Kristie L. Ebi, 2011. "Resilience to the Health Risks of Extreme Weather Events in a Changing Climate in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Andi Muhammad Tri Sakti & Siti Zaiton Mohd Ajis & Arina Anis Azlan & Hyung Joon Kim & Elizabeth Wong & Emma Mohamad, 2022. "Impact of COVID-19 on School Populations and Associated Factors: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Kai Chen & Xiaoping Lin & Han Wang & Yujie Qiang & Jie Kong & Rui Huang & Haining Wang & Hui Liu, 2022. "Visualizing the Knowledge Base and Research Hotspot of Public Health Emergency Management: A Science Mapping Analysis-Based Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Schoch-Spana, Monica & Ravi, Sanjana J. & Martin, Elena K., 2022. "Modeling epidemic recovery: An expert elicitation on issues and approaches," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    7. Elena Savoia & Foluso Agboola & Paul D. Biddinger, 2014. "A Conceptual Framework to Measure Systems’ Performance during Emergency Preparedness Exercises," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-11, September.
    8. Minjung Lee & Myoungsoon You, 2020. "Psychological and Behavioral Responses in South Korea During the Early Stages of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Jennifer C Hunter & Jane E Yang & Adam W Crawley & Laura Biesiadecki & Tomás J Aragón, 2013. "Public Health Response Systems In-Action: Learning from Local Health Departments’ Experiences with Acute and Emergency Incidents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Yuxiang Hong & Taesam Lee & Jong-Suk Kim, 2019. "Serial Multiple Mediation Analyses: How to Enhance Individual Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response to Environmental Disasters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, January.
    11. Abitbul Shimon Eliyahu & Bibu Nicolae & Danaiata Doina & Sala Diana, 2021. "Organizational Politics and its Effect on the Motivation of Workers and Volunteers in Emergency Organizations in Israel during the Coronavirus Period," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 15-32.
    12. Khalid A. Kheirallah & Mohammed Al-Nusair & Shahed Aljabeiti & Nadir Sheikali & Abdallah Alzoubi & Jomana W. Alsulaiman & Abdel-Hameed Al-Mistarehi & Hamed Alzoubi & Ayman Ahmad Bani Mousa & Mohammed , 2022. "Jordan’s Pandemic Influenza Preparedness (PIP): A Reflection on COVID-19 Response," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Elisa F. Long & Gilberto Montibeller & Jun Zhuang, 2022. "Health Decision Analysis: Evolution, Trends, and Emerging Topics," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 255-264, December.
    14. Heather Allen & Rebecca Katz, 2010. "Demography and Public Health Emergency Preparedness: Making the Connection," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 29(4), pages 527-539, August.
    15. Wang, Kun & Xiong, Li & Xue, Rudan, 2024. "Real-time data stream learning for emergency decision-making under uncertainty," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 633(C).
    16. Thushara Kamalrathne & Dilanthi Amaratunga & Richard Haigh & Lahiru Kodituwakku & Chintha Rupasinghe, 2024. "Epidemic and Pandemic Preparedness and Response in a Multi-Hazard Context: COVID-19 Pandemic as a Point of Reference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-24, September.
    17. Amir Khorram-Manesh & Maxim A. Dulebenets & Krzysztof Goniewicz, 2021. "Implementing Public Health Strategies—The Need for Educational Initiatives: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-21, May.
    18. Henry H. Willis & Melinda Moore, 2014. "Improving the Value of Analysis for Biosurveillance," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 63-81, March.
    19. Rosaria Talarico & Diana Marinello & Sara Cannizzo & Andrea Gaglioti & Simone Ticciati & Claudio Carta & Yllka Kodra & Mojgan Azadegan & Domenica Taruscio & Marta Mosca & Giuseppe Turchetti, 2020. "Shaping the Future of Rare Diseases after a Global Health Emergency: Organisational Points to Consider," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-8, November.
    20. Shuang Zhong & Michele Clark & Xiang-Yu Hou & Yuli Zang & Gerard FitzGerald, 2014. "Validation of a Framework for Measuring Hospital Disaster Resilience Using Factor Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:7:p:2293-2311:d:18579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.