IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v9y2012i6p2134-2158d18163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human Health and Climate Change: Leverage Points for Adaptation in Urban Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Katrina Proust

    (National Centre for Epidemiology and Population, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia)

  • Barry Newell

    (Fenner School for Environment and Society, Research School of Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia)

  • Helen Brown

    (School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia)

  • Anthony Capon

    (Discipline of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Chris Browne

    (Research School of Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia)

  • Anthony Burton

    (School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Jane Dixon

    (National Centre for Epidemiology and Population, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia)

  • Lisa Mu

    (Public Health and Preventive Medicine Residency Program, School of Population & Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Monica Zarafu

    (University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia)

Abstract

The design of adaptation strategies that promote urban health and well-being in the face of climate change requires an understanding of the feedback interactions that take place between the dynamical state of a city, the health of its people, and the state of the planet. Complexity, contingency and uncertainty combine to impede the growth of such systemic understandings. In this paper we suggest that the collaborative development of conceptual models can help a group to identify potential leverage points for effective adaptation. We describe a three-step procedure that leads from the development of a high-level system template, through the selection of a problem space that contains one or more of the group’s adaptive challenges, to a specific conceptual model of a sub-system of importance to the group. This procedure is illustrated by a case study of urban dwellers’ maladaptive dependence on private motor vehicles. We conclude that a system dynamics approach, revolving around the collaborative construction of a set of conceptual models, can help communities to improve their adaptive capacity, and so better meet the challenge of maintaining, and even improving, urban health in the face of climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Katrina Proust & Barry Newell & Helen Brown & Anthony Capon & Chris Browne & Anthony Burton & Jane Dixon & Lisa Mu & Monica Zarafu, 2012. "Human Health and Climate Change: Leverage Points for Adaptation in Urban Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:6:p:2134-2158:d:18163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/6/2134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/9/6/2134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cronin, Matthew A. & Gonzalez, Cleotilde & Sterman, John D., 2009. "Why don't well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 116-130, January.
    2. Timothy M. Baynes, 2009. "Complexity in Urban Development and Management," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(2), pages 214-227, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter W. Tait & Elizabeth G. Hanna, 2015. "A Conceptual Framework for Planning Systemic Human Adaptation to Global Warming," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Varun Dutt & Cleotilde Gonzalez, 2013. "Enabling Eco-Friendly Choices by Relying on the Proportional-Thinking Heuristic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    3. Hsing-Fu Kuo & Ko-Wan Tsou, 2017. "Modeling and Simulation of the Future Impacts of Urban Land Use Change on the Natural Environment by SLEUTH and Cluster Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. O'Keefe, Robert M., 2016. "Experimental behavioural research in operational research: What we know and what we might come to know," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 899-907.
    5. Luoma, Jukka, 2016. "Model-based organizational decision making: A behavioral lens," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 816-826.
    6. Haochen Shi & Miaoxi Zhao & Duncan A. Simth & Bin Chi, 2021. "Behind the Land Use Mix: Measuring the Functional Compatibility in Urban and Sub-Urban Areas of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Guido A. Veldhuis & Hubert Korzilius, 2017. "Seeing with the Mind: The Relationship Between Spatial Ability and Inferring Dynamic Behaviour from Graphs," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(6), pages 710-727, November.
    8. Handi Chandra‐Putra & Clinton J. Andrews, 2020. "An integrated model of real estate market responses to coastal flooding," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(2), pages 424-435, April.
    9. Arash Baghaei Lakeh & Navid Ghaffarzadegan, 2015. "Does analytical thinking improve understanding of accumulation?," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 31(1-2), pages 46-65, January.
    10. Juliette N. Rooney-Varga & Florian Kapmeier & John D. Sterman & Andrew P. Jones & Michele Putko & Kenneth Rath, 2020. "The Climate Action Simulation," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 51(2), pages 114-140, April.
    11. Frances M. Wijnen & Yvonne G. Mulder & Stephen M. Alessi & Lars Bollen, 2015. "The potential of learning from erroneous models: comparing three types of model instruction," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 31(4), pages 250-270, October.
    12. Erik O. Sterner & Tom Adawi & U. Martin Persson & Ulrika Lundqvist, 2019. "Knowing how and knowing when: unpacking public understanding of atmospheric CO2 accumulation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 49-67, May.
    13. Navid Ghaffarzadegan & Richard C. Larson, 2018. "SD meets OR: a new synergy to address policy problems," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 34(1-2), pages 327-353, January.
    14. Strohhecker, Jürgen & Leyer, Michael, 2019. "How stock-flow failure and general cognitive ability impact performance in operational dynamic control tasks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1044-1055.
    15. Hazhir Rahmandad & Jerker Denrell & Drazen Prelec, 2021. "What makes dynamic strategic problems difficult? Evidence from an experimental study," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5), pages 865-897, May.
    16. Becker, Kai Helge, 2016. "An outlook on behavioural OR – Three tasks, three pitfalls, one definition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 806-815.
    17. David C. Lane & Birgit Kopainsky & David C. Lane, 2017. "‘Behavioural System Dynamics’: A Very Tentative and Slightly Sceptical Map of the Territory," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 414-423, July.
    18. Arthur Kary & Guy E. Hawkins & Brett K. Hayes & Ben R. Newell, 2017. "A Bayesian latent mixture model approach to assessing performance in stock-flow reasoning," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 12(5), pages 430-444, September.
    19. Martin F. G. Schaffernicht & Stefan N. Groesser, 2016. "A competence development framework for learning and teaching system dynamics," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 32(1), pages 52-81, January.
    20. Gogi, Anastasia & Tako, Antuela A. & Robinson, Stewart, 2016. "An experimental investigation into the role of simulation models in generating insights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 931-944.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:9:y:2012:i:6:p:2134-2158:d:18163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.