IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v7y2010i8p3063-3070d9170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promotion of Physical Activity Using Point-of-Decision Prompts in Berlin Underground Stations

Author

Listed:
  • Falk Müller-Riemenschneider

    (Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charite Charite University Medical Centre Berlin, Luisenstrasse 57, 10098 Berlin, Germany)

  • Marc Nocon

    (Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charite Charite University Medical Centre Berlin, Luisenstrasse 57, 10098 Berlin, Germany)

  • Thomas Reinhold

    (Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charite Charite University Medical Centre Berlin, Luisenstrasse 57, 10098 Berlin, Germany)

  • Stefan N. Willich

    (Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charite Charite University Medical Centre Berlin, Luisenstrasse 57, 10098 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

To evaluate point-of-decision prompts in the promotion of stair use in Germany, motivational posters were placed at three underground stations in Berlin. The proportion of passengers using stairs or stairways was counted before, during installation, and two weeks after removal of posters. In total, 5,467 passersby were counted. Stair use increased significantly in women, but not in men. The present pilot study thereby shows that the use of point-of-decision prompts is also feasible in Germany and it provides some evidence of effectiveness. Methodologically rigorous studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Falk Müller-Riemenschneider & Marc Nocon & Thomas Reinhold & Stefan N. Willich, 2010. "Promotion of Physical Activity Using Point-of-Decision Prompts in Berlin Underground Stations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-8, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:7:y:2010:i:8:p:3063-3070:d:9170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/7/8/3063/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/7/8/3063/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coleman, K.J. & Gonzalez, E.C., 2001. "Promoting stair use in a US-Mexico border community," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(12), pages 2007-2009.
    2. Kerr, J. & Eves, F. & Carroll, D., 2001. "Encouraging stair use: Stair-riser banners are better than posters," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(8), pages 1192-1193.
    3. Boutelle, K.N. & Jeffery, R.W. & Murray, D.M. & Schmitz, M.K.H., 2001. "Using signs, artwork, and music to promote stair use in a public building," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(12), pages 2004-2006.
    4. Webb, O.J. & Eves, F.F., 2005. "Promoting stair use: Single versus multiple stair-riser messages," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(9), pages 1543-1544.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Alan Sloan & Benjamin Adam Haaland & Carol Leung & Falk Müller-Riemenschneider, 2013. "The Use of Point-of-Decision Prompts to Increase Stair Climbing in Singapore," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, January.
    2. Theda Radtke & Pamela Rackow, 2014. "Autonomous Motivation Is Not Enough: The Role of Compensatory Health Beliefs for the Readiness to Change Stair and Elevator Use," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Puig-Ribera & Anna M. Señé-Mir & Guy A. H. Taylor-Covill & Núria De Lara & Douglas Carroll & Amanda Daley & Roger Holder & Erica Thomas & Raimon Milà & Frank F. Eves, 2019. "Signage Interventions for Stair Climbing at Work: More than 700,000 Reasons for Caution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Amanda N. Spitzer & Katrina Oselinsky & Rachel G. Lucas-Thompson & Dan J. Graham, 2022. "Environmental Physical Activity Cues and Children’s Active vs. Sedentary Recreation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Candace Tannis & Araliya Senerat & Malika Garg & Dominique Peters & Sritha Rajupet & Elizabeth Garland, 2019. "Improving Physical Activity among Residents of Affordable Housing: Is Active Design Enough?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:7:y:2010:i:8:p:3063-3070:d:9170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.