IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i2p202-d1580561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Green Care Initiatives into Conventional Health Systems: Which Governance Dimensions Can Guide This Process?

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra Rigo

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (TESAF), University of Padova, Agripolis—Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Elena Pisani

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (TESAF), University of Padova, Agripolis—Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

  • Laura Secco

    (Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry (TESAF), University of Padova, Agripolis—Viale dell’Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy)

Abstract

Green Care initiatives (GCIs) encompass various interventions that support physical, mental, and social well-being through interaction with nature. Integrating GCIs into conventional healthcare systems is a complex task that requires multi-actor and multi-level governance efforts. This study examines, through a systematized literature review, the relevant governance dimensions to facilitate the inclusion of GCIs in traditional care pathways. From the analysis of the 36 selected studies, four key dimensions were identified: organizational structure, knowledge, legitimacy, and decentralization. The analysis highlights the need to strengthen the responsibility of Green Care actors as healthcare service providers, enhance local authorities’ role in creating new integrated service delivery networks, combine different knowledge perspectives, and legitimize non-healthcare actors. Recommendations are made to address these governance aspects to facilitate the integration of GCIs and channel their benefits in prevention and health promotion. Adopting an adequate governance framework is fundamental for mainstreaming GCIs in current healthcare systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra Rigo & Elena Pisani & Laura Secco, 2025. "Integrating Green Care Initiatives into Conventional Health Systems: Which Governance Dimensions Can Guide This Process?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(2), pages 1-30, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:202-:d:1580561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/202/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/2/202/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:2:p:202-:d:1580561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.