IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i9p1144-d1466914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Cognitive Interviews in the Development of a Survey Assessing American Indian and Alaska Native Adult Perspectives on Genetics and Biological Specimens

Author

Listed:
  • Vanessa Y. Hiratsuka

    (Southcentral Foundation, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA)

  • Julie A. Beans

    (Southcentral Foundation, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA)

  • Christie Byars

    (Chickasaw Nation, Ada, OK 74820, USA)

  • Joseph Yracheta

    (Native BioData Consortium, Eagle Butte, SD 57625, USA)

  • Paul G. Spicer

    (Center for Applied Social Research, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73072, USA)

Abstract

The cognitive interview process is a method to validate a survey instrument’s face validity and enhance confidence in item interpretation, as well as a method to engage communities in the research process. Trained American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) interviewers conducted retrospective cognitive interviews at three AIAN communities to assess the item quality of a 131-item survey item that measures AIAN knowledge and attitudes on genetics and biological specimens. A cognitive interview process was used to assess cultural consonance, thought processes used when considering survey instructions, items and responses, and language preference of survey items in the development of a survey to assess public knowledge and attitudes on genetics. Content analysis was used to analyze interview data. Survey instructions, items and scales generated no cognitive difficulties. The participants noted being unfamiliar with terminology used to describe genetic and biological specimens. In several cases, the participants’ written response in the survey and verbal response in the interview did not align. A resultant 52-item survey for use in AIAN communities was finalized. Cognitive interviewing is resource-intensive; however, ignoring community engagement during survey development results in inappropriate interpretations about culturally diverse populations such as AIAN peoples.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanessa Y. Hiratsuka & Julie A. Beans & Christie Byars & Joseph Yracheta & Paul G. Spicer, 2024. "Use of Cognitive Interviews in the Development of a Survey Assessing American Indian and Alaska Native Adult Perspectives on Genetics and Biological Specimens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1144-:d:1466914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1144/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1144/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julie A. Beans & Bobby Saunkeah & R. Brian Woodbury & Terry S. Ketchum & Paul G. Spicer & Vanessa Y. Hiratsuka, 2019. "Community Protections in American Indian and Alaska Native Participatory Research—A Scoping Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Katrina G. Claw & Casey R. Dorr & Erica L. Woodahl, 2024. "Implementing community-engaged pharmacogenomics in Indigenous communities," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-5, December.
    3. Shaw, J.L. & Robinson, R. & Starks, H. & Burke, W. & Dillard, D.A., 2013. "Risk, reward, and the double-edged sword: Perspectives on pharmacogenetic research and clinical testing among Alaska Native people," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(12), pages 2220-2225.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Horrill, Tara C. & Linton, Janice & Lavoie, Josée G. & Martin, Donna & Wiens, Allison & Schultz, Annette S.H., 2019. "Access to cancer care among Indigenous peoples in Canada: A scoping review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Orly Stampfer & Gillian Mittelstaedt & Victoria Breckwich Vásquez & Catherine J. Karr, 2019. "Guidance for Genuine Collaboration: Insights from Academic, Tribal, and Community Partner Interviews on a New Research Partnership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Julie A. Beans & Bobby Saunkeah & R. Brian Woodbury & Terry S. Ketchum & Paul G. Spicer & Vanessa Y. Hiratsuka, 2019. "Correction: Beans, J.A.; et al. Community Protections in American Indian and Alaska Native Participatory Research–A Scoping Review. Soc. Sci . 2019, 8(4), 127," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-2, August.
    4. Neha A. John-Henderson & Benjamin J. Oosterhoff & Lester R. Johnson & Mary Ellen Lafromboise & Melveena Malatare & Emily Salois, 2022. "COVID-19 and food insecurity in the Blackfeet Tribal Community," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(5), pages 1337-1346, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1144-:d:1466914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.