IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i8p1080-d1457975.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Governance of Traffic Noise Impacting Pedestrian Amenities in Melbourne Australia: A Critical Policy Review

Author

Listed:
  • David O’Reilly

    (Hawthorn Campus, Department of Interior Architecture & Industrial Design, Centre for Design Innovation; Swinburne University of Technology, John St, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia)

  • Marcus White

    (Hawthorn Campus, Department of Interior Architecture & Industrial Design, Centre for Design Innovation; Swinburne University of Technology, John St, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia)

  • Nano Langenheim

    (Parkville Campus, Melbourne School of Design, University of Melbourne, Masson Rd, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia)

  • Pantea Alambeigi

    (Hawthorn Campus, Department of Interior Architecture & Industrial Design, Centre for Design Innovation; Swinburne University of Technology, John St, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia)

Abstract

By identifying a unified aim of Federal, State, and Local government authorities to deliver healthier, more liveable urban spaces and enable walkable neighbourhoods in Melbourne, Australia, questions emerge regarding noise data collection methods and the policies that aim to protect pedestrian areas from potential increases in urban traffic noise. It highlights a missed opportunity to develop strategies that provide explicit guidance for designing more compact urban forms without diminishing pedestrian amenities. This study investigates the governance of traffic-induced noise pollution and its impact on pedestrian amenities in Melbourne, Australia. It aims to identify the government bodies best positioned to protect pedestrians from noise pollution and evaluate the strategic justification for reducing traffic noise to enhance urban walkability. This research employs a semi-systematic policy selection method and a hybrid critique and review method to evaluate the multidisciplinary governance frameworks engaged in the management and mitigation of traffic noise in Melbourne. Key findings reveal that while traffic noise poses significant health risks, current policies overlook its impact on pedestrian amenities in urban areas. This study emphasises the benefits of qualitative and subjective noise data collection to inform policy-makers of the pedestrian aural experience and impacts. Discussion points include noise management strategies and the value of implementing metropolitan-scale noise-mapping to illustrate the impact of noise rather than quantities of sound. The conclusions demonstrate that there is strategic justification for managing traffic-induced noise pollution to protect pedestrian areas within international, federal, and state government policies and implicit rationale at a local level.

Suggested Citation

  • David O’Reilly & Marcus White & Nano Langenheim & Pantea Alambeigi, 2024. "The Governance of Traffic Noise Impacting Pedestrian Amenities in Melbourne Australia: A Critical Policy Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:8:p:1080-:d:1457975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/8/1080/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/8/1080/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. von Graevenitz, Kathrine, 2018. "The amenity cost of road noise," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1-22.
    2. Julii S. Brainard & Andrew P. Jones & Ian J. Bateman, 2006. "Exposure to Environmental Urban Noise Pollution in Birmingham, UK," Chapters, in: Ysé Serret & Nick Johnstone (ed.), The Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Elise Van Kempen & Maribel Casas & Göran Pershagen & Maria Foraster, 2018. "WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects: A Summary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-59, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hausman, Catherine & Stolper, Samuel, 2021. "Inequality, information failures, and air pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Collins, Timothy W. & Nadybal, Shawna & Grineski, Sara E., 2020. "Sonic injustice: Disparate residential exposures to transport noise from road and aviation sources in the continental United States," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    3. Carrier, Mathieu & Apparicio, Philippe & Séguin, Anne-Marie, 2016. "Road traffic noise in Montreal and environmental equity: What is the situation for the most vulnerable population groups?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1-8.
    4. Haibo Wang & Zhaolang Wu & Jincai Chen, 2024. "A Prediction Method for City Traffic Noise Based on Traffic Simulation under a Mixed Distribution Probability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Ahlfeldt, Gabriel M. & Nitsch, Volker & Wendland, Nicolai, 2019. "Ease vs. noise: Long-run changes in the value of transport (dis)amenities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Ulrich Bolm-Audorff & Janice Hegewald & Anna Pretzsch & Alice Freiberg & Albert Nienhaus & Andreas Seidler, 2020. "Occupational Noise and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Owen Douglas & Enda Murphy, 2020. "Assessing the Treatment of Potential Effect Modifiers Informing World Health Organisation Guidelines for Environmental Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Davide Petri & Gaetano Licitra & Maria Angela Vigotti & Luca Fredianelli, 2021. "Effects of Exposure to Road, Railway, Airport and Recreational Noise on Blood Pressure and Hypertension," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Angel M. Dzhambov & Peter Lercher & Drozdstoy Stoyanov & Nadezhda Petrova & Stoyan Novakov & Donka D. Dimitrova, 2021. "University Students’ Self-Rated Health in Relation to Perceived Acoustic Environment during the COVID-19 Home Quarantine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Takeru Sugasawa & Yuta Kuroda & Kai Nomura & Shohei Yasuda & Jun Yoshida, 2024. "The impact of flight noise on urban housing markets: Evidence from the new landing flight paths of Haneda Airport in Japan," DSSR Discussion Papers 144, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University.
    11. Elisa Bustaffa & Olivia Curzio & Gabriele Donzelli & Francesca Gorini & Nunzia Linzalone & Marco Redini & Fabrizio Bianchi & Fabrizio Minichilli, 2022. "Risk Associations between Vehicular Traffic Noise Exposure and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Residential Retrospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Haibo Wang & Zhipeng Wu & Xiaolin Yan & Jincai Chen, 2023. "Impact Evaluation of Network Structure Differentiation on Traffic Noise during Road Network Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Atkinson, Giles & Groom, Ben & Hanley, Nicholas & Mourato, Susana, 2018. "Environmental Valuation and Benefit-Cost Analysis in U.K. Policy," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(1), pages 97-119, April.
    14. María Jesús Aranda-Balboa & Francisco Javier Huertas-Delgado & Patricia Gálvez-Fernández & Romina Saucedo-Araujo & Daniel Molina-Soberanes & Pablo Campos-Garzón & Manuel Herrador-Colmenero & Amador Je, 2022. "The Effect of a School-Based Intervention on Children’s Cycling Knowledge, Mode of Commuting and Perceived Barriers: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Nenad Ruškić & Valentina Mirović & Milovan Marić & Lato Pezo & Biljana Lončar & Milica Nićetin & Ljiljana Ćurčić, 2022. "Model for Determining Noise Level Depending on Traffic Volume at Intersections," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    16. David Rey-Blanco & Pelayo Arbués & Fernando A. López & Antonio Páez, 2024. "Using machine learning to identify spatial market segments. A reproducible study of major Spanish markets," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(1), pages 89-108, January.
    17. Panduro, Toke Emil & Jensen, Cathrine Ulla & Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark & von Graevenitz, Kathrine & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark, 2018. "Eliciting preferences for urban parks," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 127-142.
    18. Mohammad Maghrour Zefreh & Adam Torok, 2021. "Theoretical Comparison of the Effects of Different Traffic Conditions on Urban Road Environmental External Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-22, March.
    19. Mathias Basner & Maryam Witte & Sarah McGuire, 2019. "Aircraft Noise Effects on Sleep—Results of a Pilot Study Near Philadelphia International Airport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Hammad, Ahmed W A & Akbarnezhad, Ali & Rey, David, 2017. "Sustainable urban facility location: Minimising noise pollution and network congestion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 38-59.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:8:p:1080-:d:1457975. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.