IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i9p4653-d544618.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdown Measures on Noise Levels in Urban Areas—A Pre/during Comparison of Long-Term Sound Pressure Measurements in the Ruhr Area, Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas Hornberg

    (Institute for Urban Public Health, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147 Essen, Germany)

  • Timo Haselhoff

    (Institute for Urban Public Health, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147 Essen, Germany)

  • Bryce T. Lawrence

    (Department of Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, School of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, August-Schmidt-Straße 10, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Jonas L. Fischer

    (Institute for Urban Public Health, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147 Essen, Germany)

  • Salman Ahmed

    (Institute for Urban Public Health, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147 Essen, Germany)

  • Dietwald Gruehn

    (Department of Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning, School of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, August-Schmidt-Straße 10, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Susanne Moebus

    (Institute for Urban Public Health, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147 Essen, Germany)

Abstract

Background: A major source of noise pollution is traffic. In Germany, the SARS-CoV-2 lockdown caused a substantial decrease in mobility, possibly affecting noise levels. The aim is to analyze the effects of the lockdown measures on noise levels in the densely populated Ruhr Area. We focus on the analysis of noise levels before and during lockdown considering different land use types, weekdays, and time of day. Methods: We used data from 22 automatic sound devices of the SALVE (Acoustic Quality and Health in Urban Environments) project, running since 2019 in Bochum, Germany. We performed a pre/during lockdown comparison of A-weighted equivalent continuous sound pressure levels. The study period includes five weeks before and five weeks during the SARS-CoV-2 induced administrative lockdown measures starting on 16 March 2020. We stratified our data by land use category (LUC), days of the week, and daytime. Results: We observed highest noise levels pre-lockdown in the ‘main street’ and ‘commercial areas’ (68.4 ± 6.7 dB resp. 61.0 ± 8.0 dB), while in ‘urban forests’ they were lowest (50.9 ± 6.6 dB). A distinct mean overall noise reduction of 5.1 dB took place, with noise reductions occurring in each LUC. However, the magnitude of noise levels differed considerably between the categories. Weakest noise reductions were found in the ‘main street’ (3.9 dB), and strongest in the ‘urban forest’, ‘green space’, and ‘residential area’ (5.9 dB each). Conclusions: Our results are in line with studies from European cities. Strikingly, all studies report noise reductions of about 5 dB. Aiming at a transformation to a health-promoting urban mobility can be a promising approach to mitigating health risks of noise in cities. Overall, the experiences currently generated by the pandemic offer data for best practices and policies for the development of healthy urban transportation—the effects of a lower traffic and more tranquil world were experienced firsthand by people during this time.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonas Hornberg & Timo Haselhoff & Bryce T. Lawrence & Jonas L. Fischer & Salman Ahmed & Dietwald Gruehn & Susanne Moebus, 2021. "Impact of the COVID-19 Lockdown Measures on Noise Levels in Urban Areas—A Pre/during Comparison of Long-Term Sound Pressure Measurements in the Ruhr Area, Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4653-:d:544618
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4653/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4653/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yumeng Jin & Hong Jin & Jian Kang & Ziyue Yu, 2020. "Effects of openings on the wind–sound environment in the traditional residential streets in a severe cold city of China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(5), pages 808-825, June.
    2. Elise Van Kempen & Maribel Casas & Göran Pershagen & Maria Foraster, 2018. "WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects: A Summary," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-59, February.
    3. Susilo, Yusak O. & Williams, Katie & Lindsay, Morag & Dair, Carol, 2012. "The influence of individuals’ environmental attitudes and urban design features on their travel patterns in sustainable neighborhoods in the UK," Working papers in Transport Economics 2012:1, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timo Haselhoff & Tobias Braun & Jonas Hornberg & Bryce T. Lawrence & Salman Ahmed & Dietwald Gruehn & Susanne Moebus, 2022. "Analysing Interlinked Frequency Dynamics of the Urban Acoustic Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melanie Schubert & Janice Hegewald & Alice Freiberg & Karla Romero Starke & Franziska Augustin & Steffi G. Riedel-Heller & Hajo Zeeb & Andreas Seidler, 2019. "Behavioral and Emotional Disorders and Transportation Noise among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Ricardo Moreno & Francesco Bianco & Stefano Carpita & Alessandro Monticelli & Luca Fredianelli & Gaetano Licitra, 2023. "Adjusted Controlled Pass-By (CPB) Method for Urban Road Traffic Noise Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Ahmad Termida, Nursitihazlin & Susilo, Yusak O. & Franklin, Joel P., 2016. "Observing dynamic behavioural responses due to the extension of a tram line by using panel survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 78-95.
    4. Dominik Hauptvogel & Susanne Bartels & Dirk Schreckenberg & Tobias Rothmund, 2021. "Aircraft Noise Distribution as a Fairness Dilemma—A Review of Aircraft Noise through the Lens of Social Justice Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Melita Rozman Cafuta, 2015. "Open Space Evaluation Methodology and Three Dimensional Evaluation Model as a Base for Sustainable Development Tracking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Haibo Wang & Zhaolang Wu & Jincai Chen, 2024. "A Prediction Method for City Traffic Noise Based on Traffic Simulation under a Mixed Distribution Probability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Myriam Tobollik & Matthias Hintzsche & Jördis Wothge & Thomas Myck & Dietrich Plass, 2019. "Burden of Disease Due to Traffic Noise in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Aguiléra, Anne & Voisin, Marion, 2014. "Urban form, commuting patterns and CO2 emissions: What differences between the municipality’s residents and its jobs?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 243-251.
    9. Ulrich Bolm-Audorff & Janice Hegewald & Anna Pretzsch & Alice Freiberg & Albert Nienhaus & Andreas Seidler, 2020. "Occupational Noise and Hypertension Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-24, August.
    10. Owen Douglas & Enda Murphy, 2020. "Assessing the Treatment of Potential Effect Modifiers Informing World Health Organisation Guidelines for Environmental Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.
    11. Davide Petri & Gaetano Licitra & Maria Angela Vigotti & Luca Fredianelli, 2021. "Effects of Exposure to Road, Railway, Airport and Recreational Noise on Blood Pressure and Hypertension," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Angel M. Dzhambov & Peter Lercher & Drozdstoy Stoyanov & Nadezhda Petrova & Stoyan Novakov & Donka D. Dimitrova, 2021. "University Students’ Self-Rated Health in Relation to Perceived Acoustic Environment during the COVID-19 Home Quarantine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    13. Roman Roaljdovich Sidorchuk & Anastasia Vladimirovna Lukina & Sergey Vladimirovich Mkhitaryan & Irina Ivanovna Skorobogatykh & Anastasia Alexeevna Stukalova, 2021. "Local Resident Attitudes to the Sustainable Development of Urban Public Transport System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    14. Sylvester Dodzi Nyadanu & Gizachew Assefa Tessema & Ben Mullins & Bernard Kumi-Boateng & Michelle Lee Bell & Gavin Pereira, 2020. "Ambient Air Pollution, Extreme Temperatures and Birth Outcomes: A Protocol for an Umbrella Review, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Elisa Bustaffa & Olivia Curzio & Gabriele Donzelli & Francesca Gorini & Nunzia Linzalone & Marco Redini & Fabrizio Bianchi & Fabrizio Minichilli, 2022. "Risk Associations between Vehicular Traffic Noise Exposure and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Residential Retrospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Timo Haselhoff & Tobias Braun & Jonas Hornberg & Bryce T. Lawrence & Salman Ahmed & Dietwald Gruehn & Susanne Moebus, 2022. "Analysing Interlinked Frequency Dynamics of the Urban Acoustic Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-16, November.
    17. Haibo Wang & Zhipeng Wu & Xiaolin Yan & Jincai Chen, 2023. "Impact Evaluation of Network Structure Differentiation on Traffic Noise during Road Network Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Scheiner, Joachim, 2018. "Transport costs seen through the lens of residential self-selection and mobility biographies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 126-136.
    19. Apolline Saucy & Beat Schäffer & Louise Tangermann & Danielle Vienneau & Jean-Marc Wunderli & Martin Röösli, 2020. "Individual Aircraft Noise Exposure Assessment for a Case-Crossover Study in Switzerland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-12, April.
    20. Shen, Tonggaochuan & Cheng, Long & Yang, Yongjiang & Deng, Jialin & Jin, Tanhua & Cao, Mengqiu, 2023. "Do residents living in transit-oriented development station catchment areas travel more sustainably? The impacts of life events," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118813, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:9:p:4653-:d:544618. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.