IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i1p99-d1320211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biosafety Issues in Patient Transport during COVID-19: A Case Study on the Portuguese Emergency Services

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Vandenberghe

    (Centre for Applied Molecular Technologies (CTMA), Institute for Clinical and Experimental Research (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Tour Claude Bernard, Avenue Hippocrate, 54-55, bte B1.54.01, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Luis Manuel Ladeira

    (Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, Rua Almirante Barroso, 36, 1000-013 Lisboa, Portugal
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Margarida Gil

    (Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, Rua Almirante Barroso, 36, 1000-013 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Ivo Cardoso

    (Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, Rua Almirante Barroso, 36, 1000-013 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Fatima Rato

    (Instituto Nacional de Emergência Médica, Rua Almirante Barroso, 36, 1000-013 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Jessica S. Hayes

    (School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)

  • Maire A. Connolly

    (School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)

  • Jean-Luc Gala

    (Centre for Applied Molecular Technologies (CTMA), Institute for Clinical and Experimental Research (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Tour Claude Bernard, Avenue Hippocrate, 54-55, bte B1.54.01, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium)

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, first responders faced significant biosafety challenges, especially while handling patient transport, potentially exposing them to infection. The PANDEM-2 (European project on pandemic preparedness and response) project, funded by the Horizon 2020 program, sought to investigate the challenges confronting Emergency Medical Systems throughout the EU. First responders from Portugal’s National Institute of Medical Emergency (INEM) were considered as a representative operational model of the national first responder agencies of European member states because they played a critical role during the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, they were asked to complete an online survey about their COVID-19 pandemic-related professional activities. The survey focused on their perspectives on current biosafety guidelines and their operational practices. It covered opinions on existing protocols, technical concerns during patient transport, and issues after the patients arrived at the hospital. The key findings revealed concerns about risk assessment, the inadequacy of guidelines, and disparities in equipment access. This survey emphasizes the importance of developing streamlined, adaptable biosafety protocols, better coordination between prehospital and in-hospital services, and the development of scalable, cost-effective biosafety solutions. Based on our findings, we propose improvements to national and European biosafety directives and advocate for streamlined adaptation during pandemics.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Vandenberghe & Luis Manuel Ladeira & Margarida Gil & Ivo Cardoso & Fatima Rato & Jessica S. Hayes & Maire A. Connolly & Jean-Luc Gala, 2024. "Biosafety Issues in Patient Transport during COVID-19: A Case Study on the Portuguese Emergency Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-10, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:1:p:99-:d:1320211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/1/99/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/1/99/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Duggan, Jim & Andrade, Jair & Murphy, Thomas Brendan & Gleeson, James P. & Walsh, Cathal & Nolan, Philip, 2024. "An age-cohort simulation model for generating COVID-19 scenarios: A study from Ireland's pandemic response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 313(1), pages 343-358.
    2. Yi Liu & Cong Liu, 2023. "Protective and Overprotective Behaviors against COVID-19 Outbreak: Media Impact and Mediating Roles of Institutional Trust and Anxiety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Tatjana Baldovin & Irene Amoruso & Matteo Paganini & Camilla Marcato & Riccardo Boscolo Cegion & Andrea Favaro & Chiara Bertoncello & Marco Fonzo & Vincenzo Baldo, 2022. "SARS-CoV-2 Contamination of Ambulance Surfaces and Effectiveness of Routine Decontamination Procedure: A Classic Hygiene Lesson for A Novel Pathogen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-7, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pierre Vandenberghe & Jessica S. Hayes & Maire A. Connolly & Jean-Luc Gala, 2024. "A Cross-Border Biorisk Toolkit for Healthcare Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-9, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudio Thieme & Víctor Giménez & Diego Prior & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2023. "Health vs. Wealth: A Cross-country Analysis of Managerial Effectiveness of the COVID-19," Working Papers 2023/10, Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain).
    2. Faina Linkov & Christopher L. Cummings & David J. Dausey, 2024. "Official risk communication for COVID-19 and beyond: can we do a better job?," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 293-300, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:1:p:99-:d:1320211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.