IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i9p1261-d1483927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Cross-Border Biorisk Toolkit for Healthcare Professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Vandenberghe

    (Centre for Applied Molecular Technologies (CTMA), Institute for Clinical and Experimental Research (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Tour Claude Bernard, Avenue Hippocrate, 54–55, bte B1.54.01, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium)

  • Jessica S. Hayes

    (School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)

  • Maire A. Connolly

    (School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland)

  • Jean-Luc Gala

    (Centre for Applied Molecular Technologies (CTMA), Institute for Clinical and Experimental Research (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Tour Claude Bernard, Avenue Hippocrate, 54–55, bte B1.54.01, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges to public health, exposing first responders to high biosafety risks during medical assistance and containment efforts. The PANDEM-2 study aimed to address these critical biosafety issues by emphasising the importance of frequently updated, harmonised guidelines. This study reviewed scientific publications, lessons learned, and real-world experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic to identify biorisk gaps in three critical areas: (i) patient transportation and management, (ii) sample handling and testing, and (iii) data management and communication by laboratory staff. At the onset of the pandemic, first responders faced several challenges, including the rapid expansion of emergency medical services, conversion of non-medical structures, increased internal and cross-border transport of infected patients, frequent changes in biosafety protocols, and a shortage of personal protective equipment. In response, this study developed a versatile and easily adaptable toolkit, including biosafety guidance and recommendations linked to updated national and international online repositories. It establishes the groundwork for a minimum standard that can be tailored to various pandemic response scenarios, using monkeypox as a fictive test case. The toolkit enables rapid access to updated information via QR codes and mobile devices, improving biorisk response by providing an adaptable and standardised approach for caregivers involved in national and cross-border responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Vandenberghe & Jessica S. Hayes & Maire A. Connolly & Jean-Luc Gala, 2024. "A Cross-Border Biorisk Toolkit for Healthcare Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-9, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1261-:d:1483927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1261/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/9/1261/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierre Vandenberghe & Luis Manuel Ladeira & Margarida Gil & Ivo Cardoso & Fatima Rato & Jessica S. Hayes & Maire A. Connolly & Jean-Luc Gala, 2024. "Biosafety Issues in Patient Transport during COVID-19: A Case Study on the Portuguese Emergency Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-10, January.
    2. Mostafa Bentahir & Mamadou Diouldé Barry & Kekoura Koulemou & Jean-Luc Gala, 2022. "Providing On-Site Laboratory and Biosafety Just-In-Time Training Inside a Box-Based Laboratory during the West Africa Ebola Outbreak: Supporting Better Preparedness for Future Health Emergencies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gretchen Vengerova & Isaac Lipsky & Gwyneth A. Hutchinson & Nils J. H. Averesch & Aaron J. Berliner, 2024. "Space bioprocess engineering as a potential catalyst for sustainability," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 7(3), pages 238-246, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:9:p:1261-:d:1483927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.