IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i10p1330-d1494214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Perspectives on the Acceptability, Design, and Integration of Produce Prescriptions for People with Type 2 Diabetes in Australia: A Formative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Kristy K. Law

    (The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia)

  • Kathy Trieu

    (The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia)

  • Jennifer Madz

    (Diabetes Australia, Sydney, NSW 2037, Australia)

  • Daisy H. Coyle

    (The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia)

  • Kimberly Glover

    (The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia)

  • Maoyi Tian

    (The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
    School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China)

  • Yuze Xin

    (School of Public Health, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China)

  • David Simmons

    (School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia
    Macarthur Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism Service, Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia)

  • Jencia Wong

    (Diabetes Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
    Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, Central Clinical School, Central Sydney (Patyegarang) Precinct, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

  • Jason H. Y. Wu

    (The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
    School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

Produce prescription programs can benefit both individuals and health systems; however, best practices for integrating such programs into the Australian health system are yet unknown. This study explored stakeholders’ perspectives on the acceptability, potential design and integration of produce prescription programs for adults with type 2 diabetes in Australia. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 22 participants for an online workshop, representing six stakeholder groups (government, healthcare service, clinician, food retailer, consumer, non-government organisation). Participant responses were gathered through workshop discussions and a virtual collaboration tool (Mural). The workshop was video-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and thematic analysis was conducted using a deductive–inductive approach. Stakeholders recognised produce prescription as an acceptable intervention; however, they identified challenges to implementation related to contextuality, accessibility, and sustainability. Stakeholders were vocal about the approach (e.g., community-led) and infrastructure (e.g., screening tools) needed to support program design and implementation but expressed diverse views about potential funding models, indicating a need for further investigation. Aligning evaluation outcomes with existing measures in local, State and Federal initiatives was recommended, and entry points for integration were identified within and outside of the Australian health sector. Our findings provide clear considerations for future produce prescription interventions for people with type 2 diabetes.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristy K. Law & Kathy Trieu & Jennifer Madz & Daisy H. Coyle & Kimberly Glover & Maoyi Tian & Yuze Xin & David Simmons & Jencia Wong & Jason H. Y. Wu, 2024. "Stakeholder Perspectives on the Acceptability, Design, and Integration of Produce Prescriptions for People with Type 2 Diabetes in Australia: A Formative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(10), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1330-:d:1494214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/10/1330/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/10/1330/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fiona H. McKay & Bronte C. Haines & Matthew Dunn, 2019. "Measuring and Understanding Food Insecurity in Australia: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, February.
    2. Alyssa Auvinen & Mary Simock & Alyssa Moran, 2022. "Integrating Produce Prescriptions into the Healthcare System: Perspectives from Key Stakeholders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anita Rizvi & Madeleine Kearns & Michael Dignam & Alison Coates & Melissa K. Sharp & Olivia Magwood & Patrick R. Labelle & Nour Elmestekawy & Sydney Rossiter & Ali A. A. Al‐Zubaidi & Omar Dewidar & Le, 2024. "Effects of guaranteed basic income interventions on poverty‐related outcomes in high‐income countries: A systematic review and meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    2. Bailey Houghtaling & Matthew Greene & Kaustubh V. Parab & Chelsea R. Singleton, 2022. "Improving Fruit and Vegetable Accessibility, Purchasing, and Consumption to Advance Nutrition Security and Health Equity in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-12, September.
    3. Olutosin Ademola Otekunrin & Ridwan Mukaila & Oluwaseun Aramide Otekunrin, 2023. "Investigating and Quantifying Food Insecurity in Nigeria: A Systematic Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-38, September.
    4. Elias M. A. Militao & Elsa M. Salvador & Olalekan A. Uthman & Stig Vinberg & Gloria Macassa, 2022. "Food Insecurity and Health Outcomes Other than Malnutrition in Southern Africa: A Descriptive Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Kimberley A. Baxter & Smita Nambiar & Tsz Hei Jeffrey So & Danielle Gallegos & Rebecca Byrne, 2022. "Parental Feeding Practices in Families Experiencing Food Insecurity: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-43, May.
    6. Elena Carrillo-Álvarez & Blanca Salinas-Roca & Lluís Costa-Tutusaus & Raimon Milà-Villarroel & Nithya Shankar Krishnan, 2021. "The Measurement of Food Insecurity in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-57, September.
    7. Amber Bastian & Courtney Parks & Fiona H. McKay & Paige van der Pligt & Amy Yaroch & Sarah A. McNaughton & Rebecca Lindberg, 2022. "Development of a Comprehensive Household Food Security Tool for Families with Young Children and/or Pregnant Women in High Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Megan C. Whatnall & Melinda J. Hutchesson & Amanda J. Patterson, 2019. "Predictors of Food Insecurity among Australian University Students: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Ami N. Seivwright & Zoe Callis & Paul Flatau, 2020. "Food Insecurity and Socioeconomic Disadvantage in Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-13, January.
    10. Brittany J. Johnson & Dorota Zarnowiecki & Claire L. Hutchinson & Rebecca K. Golley, 2020. "Stakeholder Generated Ideas for Alternative School Food Provision Models in Australia Using the Nominal Group Technique," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-12, October.
    11. Thorpe, Karen & Potia, Azhar Hussain & Searle, Bonnie & Van Halen, Olivia & Lakeman, Nicole & Oakes, Candice & Harris, Holly & Staton, Sally, 2022. "Meal provision in early childhood education and care programs: Association with geographic disadvantage, social disadvantage, cost, and market competition in an Australian population," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    12. Courtney A. Parks & Amber Bastian & Rebecca Lindberg & Fiona H. McKay & Paige Pligt & Amy L. Yaroch, 2022. "Food insecurity among parents of young children in the United States and Australia: focusing on etiology and outcomes," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(6), pages 1499-1502, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:10:p:1330-:d:1494214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.