IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i9p5618-d1131131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Twelve Ds: An Update to Edwards and Benson’s Reasons for Non-Parental Caregiving

Author

Listed:
  • Acacia R. Lopez

    (Department of Psychology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA)

  • Danielle K. Nadorff

    (Department of Psychology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA)

  • Delaney Peters

    (Department of Psychology, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA)

Abstract

This qualitative study examined the prevalence of the “Nine Ds,” a framework developed by Edwards and Benson for understanding the heterogeneity of reasons for which grandparents assume care of grandchildren (i.e., death, disease, detention, divorce, departure, drugs, desertion, delivery, deployment) in a contemporary sample. Using a nationwide sample of custodial grandparents ( N = 322) and foster parents (N = 105) , caregivers were asked their reason for assuming care of the grandchild or foster child within their care. The results of the study suggest that the Nine Ds are a useful framework, but accounted for only 21.74% of responses, indicating the Nine Ds fail to capture many of the reasons for assuming care. Three new themes—dollars, duty, and daily grind—were identified using semantic thematic analysis and are applicable to both grandfamilies and foster families. These themes represent different motivations for assuming care and provide insight into the social structures that may act as barriers to family formation. This study provides a foundation for future research examining the impact of assumed care by non-parental attachment figures on the health and well-being of both grandchildren and foster children.

Suggested Citation

  • Acacia R. Lopez & Danielle K. Nadorff & Delaney Peters, 2023. "The Twelve Ds: An Update to Edwards and Benson’s Reasons for Non-Parental Caregiving," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:9:p:5618-:d:1131131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5618/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5618/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boas, Taylor C. & Christenson, Dino P. & Glick, David M., 2020. "Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 232-250, April.
    2. Jian Yu & Zhonggen Zhang, 2021. "Does Living with Grandparents Affect Children’s and Adolescents’ Health? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Sung H Shin & Heeseung Choi & Mi J Kim & Yoon H Kim, 2010. "Comparing adolescents’ adjustment and family resilience in divorced families depending on the types of primary caregiver," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1695-1706, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barton, Jared & Pan, Xiaofei, 2022. "Movin’ on up? A survey experiment on mobility enhancing policies," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    2. Robert Kubinec & Haillie Na‐Kyung Lee & Andrey Tomashevskiy, 2021. "Politically connected companies are less likely to shutdown due to COVID‐19 restrictions," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 102(5), pages 2155-2169, September.
    3. Narae Kim & Jeong-Nam Kim, 2024. "A COVID-19 Paradox of Communication, Ignorance, and Vaccination Intention," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    4. Ji Yun Lee & Fangjiao Ma & Yue Li, 2022. "Understanding homeowner proactive actions for managing wildfire risks," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1525-1547, November.
    5. Ahmet Erkuş & Mine Afacan Fındıklı, 2021. "Workplace Happiness: A Research on the Effects of Workplace Environment and Psychological Capital," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 0(91), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Michael Kumove, 2022. "Does Language Foster Reconciliation? Evidence From the Former Yugoslavia," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(4-5), pages 783-808, May.
    7. Ran Zhuo & Yanhua Yu & Xiaoxue Shi, 2022. "Family Resilience and Adolescent Mental Health during COVID-19: A Moderated Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Lisa M. Fucito & Krysten W. Bold & Sydney Cannon & Alison Serrantino & Rebecca Marrero & Stephanie S. O’Malley, 2022. "Cigarette Smoking in Response to COVID-19: Examining Co-Morbid Medical Conditions and Risk Perceptions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-12, July.
    9. Sean F. Ellis & Olesya M. Savchenko & Kent D. Messer, 2022. "Mitigating stigma associated with recycled water," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(3), pages 1077-1099, May.
    10. Li, Haibin & Liebenberg, Linda & Ungar, Michael, 2015. "Understanding service provision and utilization for vulnerable youth: Evidence from multiple informants," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 18-25.
    11. Hannah Casey & Deirdre Desmond & Laura Coffey, 2023. "Professional and Family Carers’ Perspectives on the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Supported Decision-Making with Adults with Intellectual Disabilities: A Qualitative Online Survey," Disabilities, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-11, April.
    12. Matthew H. Goldberg & Abel Gustafson & Matthew T. Ballew & Seth A. Rosenthal & Matthew J. Cutler & Anthony Leiserowitz, 2020. "Predictors of global warming risk perceptions among Latino and non-Latino White Americans," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1555-1574, October.
    13. Heidi Reed, 2022. "When the Right Thing to Do Is Also the Wrong Thing: Moral Sensemaking of Responsible Business Behavior During the COVID-19 Crisis," Post-Print hal-04531082, HAL.
    14. Huichuan Xia, 2023. "What scholars and IRBs talk when they talk about the Belmont principles in crowd work‐based research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(1), pages 67-80, January.
    15. Roselyn J. Lee-Won & Inyoung Jang & Hyun-Suk Kim & Sung-Gwan Park, 2022. "The Relationship between Future Anxiety Due to COVID-19 and Vigilance: The Role of Message Fatigue and Autonomy Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.
    16. Xuesong You & Carolyn Kousky, 2024. "Improving household and community disaster recovery: Evidence on the role of insurance," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 91(2), pages 299-338, June.
    17. Sarpong, Dennis, 2024. "National Identification and Public Cooperation with the Police in Ghana," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Pankaj Tiwari, 2023. "Influence of Millennials’ eco-literacy and biospheric values on green purchases: the mediating effect of attitude," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1195-1212, September.
    19. S. Brent Jackson & Kathryn T. Stevenson & Lincoln R. Larson & M. Nils Peterson & Erin Seekamp, 2021. "Outdoor Activity Participation Improves Adolescents’ Mental Health and Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, March.
    20. Park, Keunhyun & Chamberlain, Brent & Song, Ziqi & Nasr Esfahani, Hossein & Sheen, Jeff & Larsen, Teresa & Long Novack, Valerie & Licon, Carlos & Christensen, Keith, 2022. "A double jeopardy: COVID-19 impacts on the travel behavior and community living of people with disabilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 24-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:9:p:5618-:d:1131131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.