IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p4457-d1085617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging Digital Technology to Support Pregnant and Early Parenting Women in Recovery from Addictive Substances: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Phyllis Raynor

    (College of Nursing, Advancing Chronic Care Outcomes through Research and iNnovation (ACORN) Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Cynthia Corbett

    (College of Nursing, Advancing Chronic Care Outcomes through Research and iNnovation (ACORN) Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Delia West

    (Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • D’Arion Johnston

    (College of Education, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

  • Kacey Eichelberger

    (Prisma Health Upstate, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC 29605, USA)

  • Alain Litwin

    (Prisma Health Upstate, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC 29605, USA
    School of Health Research, Clemson University, Greenville, SC 29601, USA)

  • Constance Guille

    (College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA)

  • Ron Prinz

    (Psychology Department, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA)

Abstract

Little is known about digital health interventions used to support treatment for pregnant and early parenting women (PEPW) with substance use disorders (SUD). Methods: Guided by the Arksey and O’Malley’s Scoping Review Framework, empirical studies were identified within the CINAHL, PsycInfo, PubMed, and ProQuest databases using subject headings and free-text keywords. Studies were selected based on a priori inclusion/exclusion criteria, and data extraction and descriptive analysis were performed. Results: A total of 27 original studies and 30 articles were included. Varying study designs were used, including several feasibility and acceptability studies. However, efficacious findings on abstinence and other clinically important outcomes were reported in several studies. Most studies focused on digital interventions for pregnant women (89.7%), suggesting a dearth of research on how digital technologies may support early parenting women with SUD. No studies included PEPW family members or involved PEPW women in the intervention design. Conclusions: The science of digital interventions to support treatment for PEPW is in an early stage, but feasibility and efficacy results are promising. Future research should explore community-based participatory partnerships with PEPW to develop or tailor digital interventions and include family or external support systems to engage in the intervention alongside PEPW.

Suggested Citation

  • Phyllis Raynor & Cynthia Corbett & Delia West & D’Arion Johnston & Kacey Eichelberger & Alain Litwin & Constance Guille & Ron Prinz, 2023. "Leveraging Digital Technology to Support Pregnant and Early Parenting Women in Recovery from Addictive Substances: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4457-:d:1085617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4457/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4457/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine Silang & Hangsel Sanguino & Pooja R. Sohal & Charlie Rioux & Hyoun S. Kim & Lianne M. Tomfohr-Madsen, 2021. "eHealth Interventions to Treat Substance Use in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Damon, Will & Callon, Cody & Wiebe, Lee & Small, Will & Kerr, Thomas & McNeil, Ryan, 2017. "Community-based participatory research in a heavily researched inner city neighbourhood: Perspectives of people who use drugs on their experiences as peer researchers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 85-92.
    3. Victoria Bright & Julia Riddle & Jean Kerver, 2022. "Stigma Experienced by Rural Pregnant Women with Substance Use Disorder: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-10, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amy E. Lesen & Chloe Tucker & M. G. Olson & Regardt J. Ferreira, 2019. "‘Come Back at Us’: Reflections on Researcher-Community Partnerships during a Post-Oil Spill Gulf Coast Resilience Study," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Bradbury-Jones, Caroline & Isham, Louise & Taylor, Julie, 2018. "The complexities and contradictions in participatory research with vulnerable children and young people: A qualitative systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 80-91.
    3. Guise, Andy, 2024. "Stigma power in practice: Exploring the contribution of Bourdieu's theory to stigma, discrimination and health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 347(C).
    4. Fleming, Taylor & Collins, Alexandra B. & Boyd, Jade & Knight, Kelly R. & McNeil, Ryan, 2023. "“It's no foundation, there's no stabilization, you're just scattered”: A qualitative study of the institutional circuit of recently-evicted people who use drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    5. Irene Caro-Cañizares & Nayara López Carpintero & Rodrigo Carmona-Camacho, 2024. "The Elephant in the Room: A Systematic Review of the Application and Effects of Psychological Treatments for Pregnant Women with Dual Pathology (Mental Health and Substance-Related Disorders)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-16, March.
    6. Miewald, Christiana & McCann, Eugene & Temenos, Cristina & McIntosh, Alison, 2019. "“I do my best to eat while I'm using”: Mapping the foodscapes of people living with HIV/AIDS who use drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 96-103.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4457-:d:1085617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.