IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p4365-d1083888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-Based Assessment of 132 kV Electric Distribution Substations and Proximal Residential Areas in the Mangaung Metropolitan Region

Author

Listed:
  • Phoka Caiphus Rathebe

    (Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein, P.O. Box 524, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Setlamorago Jackson Mbazima

    (School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa
    Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida Park, Johannesburg 1709, South Africa
    Department of Toxicology and Biochemistry, National Institute of Occupational Health, Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Braamfontein, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa)

Abstract

Annually, an estimate of 2.3 million workers die prematurely due to occupational injuries and illnesses. In this study, a risk assessment was conducted to evaluate the compliance of 132 kV electric distribution substations and proximal residential areas with the South African occupational health and safety Act 85 of 1993. Data were collected from 30 electric distribution substations and 30 proximal residential areas using a checklist. Distribution substations of 132 kV were assigned an overall compliance value of ≥80%, while a composite risk value of < 0.5 was assigned to individual residential areas. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to check for data normality before multiple comparisons and the Bonferroni adjustment was applied. Non-compliances in electric distribution substations were as a result of poor housekeeping and inappropriate fencing conditions. Ninety-three percent of the electric distribution substations (28/30) scored < 75% compliance on housekeeping and 30% (7/30) were non-compliant (<100%) on fencing. Conversely, there was compliance in the proximal residential areas concerning the substations. Statistically significant differences were found when substation positioning and surrounding infrastructure ( p < 0.00), electromagnetic field sources ( p < 0.00) and maintenance/general tidiness ( p < 0.00) were compared. A peak risk value of 0.6 was observed when comparing the substation positioning with proximal electromagnetic field sources in the residential area. Housekeeping and fencing in the distribution substations must be improved to prevent occupational incidents such as injuries, fire outbreaks, theft and vandalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Phoka Caiphus Rathebe & Setlamorago Jackson Mbazima, 2023. "Risk-Based Assessment of 132 kV Electric Distribution Substations and Proximal Residential Areas in the Mangaung Metropolitan Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4365-:d:1083888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4365/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4365/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francisco Haces-Fernandez, 2020. "Wind Energy Implementation to Mitigate Wildfire Risk and Preemptive Blackouts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Amigun, Bamikole & Petrie, Daniel & Görgens, Johann, 2011. "Economic risk assessment of advanced process technologies for bioethanol production in South Africa: Monte Carlo analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 3178-3186.
    3. David Ward, 2013. "The effect of weather on grid systems and the reliability of electricity supply," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(1), pages 103-113, November.
    4. V M Rao Tummala & C L Mak, 2001. "A risk management model for improving operation and maintenance activities in electricity transmission networks," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(2), pages 125-134, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnold, Uwe & Yildiz, Özgür, 2015. "Economic risk analysis of decentralized renewable energy infrastructures – A Monte Carlo Simulation approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 227-239.
    2. Yang, Jing & Zhang, Zhiyong & Hong, Ming & Yang, Mingwan & Chen, Jiayu, 2020. "An oligarchy game model for the mobile waste heat recovery energy supply chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    3. Lin Wang & Yuping Xing, 2022. "Risk Assessment of a Coupled Natural Gas and Electricity Market Considering Dual Interactions: A System Dynamics Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Shield, Stephen A. & Quiring, Steven M. & Pino, Jordan V. & Buckstaff, Ken, 2021. "Major impacts of weather events on the electrical power delivery system in the United States," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    5. Robus, Charles L.L. & Gottumukkala, Lalitha Devi & van Rensburg, Eugéne & Görgens, Johann F., 2016. "Feasible process development and techno-economic evaluation of paper sludge to bioethanol conversion: South African paper mills scenario," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 333-345.
    6. Fant, Charles & Boehlert, Brent & Strzepek, Kenneth & Larsen, Peter & White, Alisa & Gulati, Sahil & Li, Yue & Martinich, Jeremy, 2020. "Climate change impacts and costs to U.S. electricity transmission and distribution infrastructure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    7. Ioannou, Anastasia & Angus, Andrew & Brennan, Feargal, 2017. "Risk-based methods for sustainable energy system planning: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 602-615.
    8. Nigus Demelash Melaku & Ali Fares & Ripendra Awal, 2023. "Exploring the Impact of Winter Storm Uri on Power Outage, Air Quality, and Water Systems in Texas, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Hossain, Eklas & Roy, Shidhartho & Mohammad, Naeem & Nawar, Nafiu & Dipta, Debopriya Roy, 2021. "Metrics and enhancement strategies for grid resilience and reliability during natural disasters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    10. Brocks, Annette & Nyangon, Joseph & Taminiau, Job, 2016. "Utility 2.0: A multi-dimensional review of New York’s Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) and Great Britain’s RIIO utility business models," MPRA Paper 91489, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Sep 2016.
    11. Daniel C. Steinberg & Bryan K. Mignone & Jordan Macknick & Yinong Sun & Kelly Eurek & Andrew Badger & Ben Livneh & Kristen Averyt, 2020. "Decomposing supply-side and demand-side impacts of climate change on the US electricity system through 2050," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 125-139, January.
    12. Adeniyi Kehinde Onaolapo & Rudiren Pillay Carpanen & David George Dorrell & Evans Eshiemogie Ojo, 2022. "A Comparative Assessment of Conventional and Artificial Neural Networks Methods for Electricity Outage Forecasting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Aviva Loew & Paulina Jaramillo & Haibo Zhai & Rahim Ali & Bart Nijssen & Yifan Cheng & Kelly Klima, 2020. "Fossil fuel–fired power plant operations under a changing climate," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 619-632, November.
    14. Pascale Combes Motel & Jean-Louis Combes & Bao-We-Wal Bambe & Chantale Riziki Oweggi, 2023. "Does Climate Change Affect Firms’ Innovative Capacity in Developing Countries ?," Working Papers hal-04341934, HAL.
    15. Ziyi Wang & Zengqiao Chen & Cuiping Ma & Ronald Wennersten & Qie Sun, 2022. "Nationwide Evaluation of Urban Energy System Resilience in China Using a Comprehensive Index Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-36, February.
    16. Ulvi Rzazade & Sergey Deryabin & Igor Temkin & Egor Kondratev & Alexander Ivannikov, 2023. "On the Issue of the Creation and Functioning of Energy Efficiency Management Systems for Technological Processes of Mining Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Martin Hromada & David Rehak & Ludek Lukas, 2021. "Resilience Assessment in Electricity Critical Infrastructure from the Point of View of Converged Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Mohammad Majid Fouladgar Author_Email: & Abdolreza Yadani-Chamzini & Mohammad Hossein Basiri, 2011. "Risk Evaluation Of Tunnelling Projects By Fuzzy Topsis," International Conference on Management (ICM 2011) Proceeding 2011-087-331, Conference Master Resources.
    19. Kamia Handayani & Tatiana Filatova & Yoram Krozer, 2019. "The Vulnerability of the Power Sector to Climate Variability and Change: Evidence from Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-25, September.
    20. Perera, A.T.D. & Hong, Tianzhen, 2023. "Vulnerability and resilience of urban energy ecosystems to extreme climate events: A systematic review and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4365-:d:1083888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.