IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i5p4365-d1083888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk-Based Assessment of 132 kV Electric Distribution Substations and Proximal Residential Areas in the Mangaung Metropolitan Region

Author

Listed:
  • Phoka Caiphus Rathebe

    (Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Doornfontein, P.O. Box 524, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Setlamorago Jackson Mbazima

    (School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Braamfontein, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa
    Department of Environmental Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida Park, Johannesburg 1709, South Africa
    Department of Toxicology and Biochemistry, National Institute of Occupational Health, Division of the National Health Laboratory Service, Braamfontein, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa)

Abstract

Annually, an estimate of 2.3 million workers die prematurely due to occupational injuries and illnesses. In this study, a risk assessment was conducted to evaluate the compliance of 132 kV electric distribution substations and proximal residential areas with the South African occupational health and safety Act 85 of 1993. Data were collected from 30 electric distribution substations and 30 proximal residential areas using a checklist. Distribution substations of 132 kV were assigned an overall compliance value of ≥80%, while a composite risk value of < 0.5 was assigned to individual residential areas. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to check for data normality before multiple comparisons and the Bonferroni adjustment was applied. Non-compliances in electric distribution substations were as a result of poor housekeeping and inappropriate fencing conditions. Ninety-three percent of the electric distribution substations (28/30) scored < 75% compliance on housekeeping and 30% (7/30) were non-compliant (<100%) on fencing. Conversely, there was compliance in the proximal residential areas concerning the substations. Statistically significant differences were found when substation positioning and surrounding infrastructure ( p < 0.00), electromagnetic field sources ( p < 0.00) and maintenance/general tidiness ( p < 0.00) were compared. A peak risk value of 0.6 was observed when comparing the substation positioning with proximal electromagnetic field sources in the residential area. Housekeeping and fencing in the distribution substations must be improved to prevent occupational incidents such as injuries, fire outbreaks, theft and vandalism.

Suggested Citation

  • Phoka Caiphus Rathebe & Setlamorago Jackson Mbazima, 2023. "Risk-Based Assessment of 132 kV Electric Distribution Substations and Proximal Residential Areas in the Mangaung Metropolitan Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4365-:d:1083888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4365/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/5/4365/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amigun, Bamikole & Petrie, Daniel & Görgens, Johann, 2011. "Economic risk assessment of advanced process technologies for bioethanol production in South Africa: Monte Carlo analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 3178-3186.
    2. V M Rao Tummala & C L Mak, 2001. "A risk management model for improving operation and maintenance activities in electricity transmission networks," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(2), pages 125-134, February.
    3. Francisco Haces-Fernandez, 2020. "Wind Energy Implementation to Mitigate Wildfire Risk and Preemptive Blackouts," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, May.
    4. David Ward, 2013. "The effect of weather on grid systems and the reliability of electricity supply," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(1), pages 103-113, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin Wang & Yuping Xing, 2022. "Risk Assessment of a Coupled Natural Gas and Electricity Market Considering Dual Interactions: A System Dynamics Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Robus, Charles L.L. & Gottumukkala, Lalitha Devi & van Rensburg, Eugéne & Görgens, Johann F., 2016. "Feasible process development and techno-economic evaluation of paper sludge to bioethanol conversion: South African paper mills scenario," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 333-345.
    3. Fant, Charles & Boehlert, Brent & Strzepek, Kenneth & Larsen, Peter & White, Alisa & Gulati, Sahil & Li, Yue & Martinich, Jeremy, 2020. "Climate change impacts and costs to U.S. electricity transmission and distribution infrastructure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    4. Hossain, Eklas & Roy, Shidhartho & Mohammad, Naeem & Nawar, Nafiu & Dipta, Debopriya Roy, 2021. "Metrics and enhancement strategies for grid resilience and reliability during natural disasters," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    5. Brocks, Annette & Nyangon, Joseph & Taminiau, Job, 2016. "Utility 2.0: A multi-dimensional review of New York’s Reforming the Energy Vision (REV) and Great Britain’s RIIO utility business models," MPRA Paper 91489, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Sep 2016.
    6. Daniel C. Steinberg & Bryan K. Mignone & Jordan Macknick & Yinong Sun & Kelly Eurek & Andrew Badger & Ben Livneh & Kristen Averyt, 2020. "Decomposing supply-side and demand-side impacts of climate change on the US electricity system through 2050," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 125-139, January.
    7. Pascale Combes Motel & Jean-Louis Combes & Bao-We-Wal Bambe & Chantale Riziki Oweggi, 2023. "Does Climate Change Affect Firms’ Innovative Capacity in Developing Countries ?," Working Papers hal-04341934, HAL.
    8. Ulvi Rzazade & Sergey Deryabin & Igor Temkin & Egor Kondratev & Alexander Ivannikov, 2023. "On the Issue of the Creation and Functioning of Energy Efficiency Management Systems for Technological Processes of Mining Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Martin Hromada & David Rehak & Ludek Lukas, 2021. "Resilience Assessment in Electricity Critical Infrastructure from the Point of View of Converged Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Perera, A.T.D. & Hong, Tianzhen, 2023. "Vulnerability and resilience of urban energy ecosystems to extreme climate events: A systematic review and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    11. Heino Pesch & Louis Louw, 2023. "Evaluating the Economic Feasibility of Plant Factory Scenarios That Produce Biomass for Biorefining Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-36, January.
    12. Gonçalves, Ana & Marques, Margarida Correia & Loureiro, Sílvia & Nieto, Raquel & Liberato, Margarida L.R., 2023. "Disruption risk analysis of the overhead power lines in Portugal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    13. Craig, Michael T. & Cohen, Stuart & Macknick, Jordan & Draxl, Caroline & Guerra, Omar J. & Sengupta, Manajit & Haupt, Sue Ellen & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & Brancucci, Carlo, 2018. "A review of the potential impacts of climate change on bulk power system planning and operations in the United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 255-267.
    14. Fanny Groundstroem & Sirkku Juhola, 2019. "A framework for identifying cross-border impacts of climate change on the energy sector," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 3-15, March.
    15. Robert Huang & Matthew E. Kahn, 2024. "United States Electric Utility Adaptation to Natural Hazards and Green Power Mandates," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 263-282, July.
    16. Xu, Luo & Guo, Qinglai & Sheng, Yujie & Muyeen, S.M. & Sun, Hongbin, 2021. "On the resilience of modern power systems: A comprehensive review from the cyber-physical perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    17. Larsen, Peter H. & Boehlert, Brent & Eto, Joseph & Hamachi-LaCommare, Kristina & Martinich, Jeremy & Rennels, Lisa, 2018. "Projecting future costs to U.S. electric utility customers from power interruptions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1256-1277.
    18. Appiah-Nkansah, Nana Baah & Li, Jun & Rooney, William & Wang, Donghai, 2019. "A review of sweet sorghum as a viable renewable bioenergy crop and its techno-economic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1121-1132.
    19. Kampova, Katarina & Lovecek, Tomas & Rehak, David, 2020. "Quantitative approach to physical protection systems assessment of critical infrastructure elements: Use case in the Slovak Republic," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    20. J. Cherrier & Y. Klein & H. Link & J. Pillich & N. Yonzan, 2016. "Hybrid green infrastructure for reducing demands on urban water and energy systems: a New York City hypothetical case study," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 6(1), pages 77-89, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:5:p:4365-:d:1083888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.