IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p3734-d1074191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community ( RISC ) among Older Adults in the Emergency Department

Author

Listed:
  • Rónán O’Caoimh

    (Department of Geriatric Medicine, Mercy University Hospital, Grenville Place, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland
    Clinical Research Facility Cork, Mercy University Hospital, University College Cork, T12 WE28 Cork, Ireland)

Abstract

Although several short-risk-prediction instruments are used in the emergency department (ED), there remains insufficient evidence to guide healthcare professionals on their use. The Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community ( RISC ) is an established screen comprising three Likert scales examining the risk of three adverse outcomes among community-dwelling older adults at one-year: institutionalisation, hospitalisation, and death, which are scored from one (rare/minimal) to five (certain/extreme) and combined into an Overall RISC score. In the present study, the RISC was externally validated by comparing it with different frailty screens to predict risk of hospitalisation (30-day readmission), prolonged length of stay (LOS), one-year mortality, and institutionalisation among 193 consecutive patients aged ≥70 attending a large university hospital ED in Western Ireland, assessed for frailty, determined by comprehensive geriatric assessment. The median LOS was 8 ± 9 days; 20% were re-admitted <30 days; 13.5% were institutionalised; 17% had died; and 60% (116/193) were frail. Based on the area under the ROC curve scores (AUC), the Overall RISC score had the greatest diagnostic accuracy for predicting one-year mortality and institutionalisation: AUC 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68–0.87) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.64–0.82), respectively. None of the instruments were accurate in predicting 30-day readmission (AUC all <0.70). The Overall RISC score had good accuracy for identifying frailty (AUC 0.84). These results indicate that the RISC is an accurate risk-prediction instrument and frailty measure in the ED.

Suggested Citation

  • Rónán O’Caoimh, 2023. "Validation of the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community ( RISC ) among Older Adults in the Emergency Department," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3734-:d:1074191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3734/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3734/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuseppe Liotta & Silvia Ussai & Maddalena Illario & Rónán O’Caoimh & Antonio Cano & Carol Holland & Regina Roller-Winsberger & Alessandra Capanna & Chiara Grecuccio & Mariacarmela Ferraro & Francesca, 2018. "Frailty as the Future Core Business of Public Health: Report of the Activities of the A3 Action Group of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP on AHA)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-26, December.
    2. Rónán O’Caoimh & Maria Costello & Cliona Small & Lynn Spooner & Antoinette Flannery & Liam O’Reilly & Laura Heffernan & Edel Mannion & Anna Maughan & Alma Joyce & D. William Molloy & John O’Donnell, 2019. "Comparison of Frailty Screening Instruments in the Emergency Department," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Elizabeth Moloney & Duygu Sezgin & Mark O’Donovan & Kadjo Yves Cedric Adja & Keith McGrath & Aaron Liew & Jacopo Lenzi & Davide Gori & Kieran O’Connor & David William Molloy & Evelyn Flanagan & Darren, 2022. "The Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinimetric Properties of Screening Instruments to Identify Frail Older Adults Attending Emergency Departments: A Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Meta-An," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rónán O’Caoimh & Jane McGauran & Mark R. O’Donovan & Ciara Gillman & Anne O’Hea & Mary Hayes & Kieran O’Connor & Elizabeth Moloney & Megan Alcock, 2022. "Frailty Screening in the Emergency Department: Comparing the Variable Indicative of Placement Risk, Clinical Frailty Scale and PRISMA-7," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Mark O’Donovan & Duygu Sezgin & Zubair Kabir & Aaron Liew & Rónán O’Caoimh, 2020. "Assessing Global Frailty Scores: Development of a Global Burden of Disease-Frailty Index (GBD-FI)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Roberta Patalano & Vincenzo De Luca & Jess Vogt & Strahil Birov & Lucia Giovannelli & Giuseppe Carruba & Claudia Pivonello & Veli Stroetmann & Maria Triassi & Annamaria Colao & Maddalena Illario, 2021. "An Innovative Approach to Designing Digital Health Solutions Addressing the Unmet Needs of Obese Patients in Europe," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Rónán O’Caoimh & Maria Costello & Cliona Small & Lynn Spooner & Antoinette Flannery & Liam O’Reilly & Laura Heffernan & Edel Mannion & Anna Maughan & Alma Joyce & D. William Molloy & John O’Donnell, 2019. "Comparison of Frailty Screening Instruments in the Emergency Department," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Vincenzo De Luca & Grazia Daniela Femminella & Roberta Patalano & Valeria Formosa & Grazia Lorusso & Cristiano Rivetta & Federica Di Lullo & Lorenzo Mercurio & Teresa Rea & Elena Salvatore & Nilufer K, 2022. "Assessment Tools of Biopsychosocial Frailty Dimensions in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-32, November.
    6. Giuseppe Liotta & Grazia Lorusso & Olga Madaro & Valeria Formosa & Leonardo Emberti Gialloreti & Clara Donnoli & Fabio Riccardi & Stefano Orlando & Paola Scarcella & Joao Apostolo & Rosa Silva & Carin, 2023. "Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) of the Short Functional Geriatric Evaluation (SFGE) to Assess the Multidimensionality of Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-9, February.
    7. Laura Gaffney & Agnes Jonsson & Conor Judge & Maria Costello & John O’Donnell & Rónán O’Caoimh, 2022. "Using the “Surprise Question” to Predict Frailty and Healthcare Outcomes among Older Adults Attending the Emergency Department," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-11, February.
    8. Irene Monsonís-Payá & Tomás Gómez-Navarro & Mónica García-Melón, 2020. "Anticipating Environmental Burdens in Research and Innovation Projects—Application to the Case of Active and Healthy Ageing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Eduarda Oliosi & Federico Guede-Fernández & Ana Londral, 2022. "Machine Learning Approaches for the Frailty Screening: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-11, July.
    10. Elizabeth Moloney & Mark R. O’Donovan & Duygu Sezgin & Evelyn Flanagan & Keith McGrath & Suzanne Timmons & Rónán O’Caoimh, 2023. "Diagnostic Accuracy of Frailty Screening Instruments Validated for Use among Older Adults Attending Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Debbie Rand & Shelley A. Sternberg & Reut Gasner Winograd & Zvi Buckman & Netta Bentur, 2022. "The Contribution of Frailty to Participation of Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-9, January.
    12. Rónán O’Caoimh & Laura Morrison & Maria Costello & Antoinette Flannery & Cliona Small & Liam O’Reilly & Laura Heffernan & Edel Mannion & Ruairi Waters & Shaun O’Keeffe, 2024. "Frailty in an Adult Acute Hospital Population: Predictors, Prevalence, and Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3734-:d:1074191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.