IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p3344-d1068176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inheritance and Innovation of Pottery Sculpture Technique in Shiwan, China: A Grounded Study from Cultural Ecology

Author

Listed:
  • Liting Zhou

    (School of Urban Culture, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)

  • Xiaomei Zou

    (School of Urban Culture, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)

  • Yongnan Huang

    (School of Educational Information Technology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)

  • Yiyong Li

    (School of Urban Culture, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)

  • Luyao Guo

    (School of Urban Culture, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)

  • Junyu Fu

    (School of International Business, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)

Abstract

Ceramics play an important role in human daily life and production practice. Pottery sculpture technique is the core of ceramic making. However, the production process of traditional ceramics is accompanied by high pollution, which has a great impact on human health and the ecological environment. Rapid development of industrialization has exacerbated this consequence. As the “Pottery Capital of Southern China”, Foshan has been involved in environmental crises while relying on the ceramic industry to develop. Since the 21st century, Foshan has gradually successfully driven to upgrade the city from industrial to culture-led by carrying out positive innovations in Shiwan pottery sculpture technique. Therefore, based on the theoretical perspective of cultural ecology, this paper selects Shiwan pottery sculpture technique as the object, uses Python (Octopus Collector) to obtain data, and applies grounded theory to generate the ecological evolution model. This study discussed how the Shiwan pottery sculpture technique promotes the harmonious coexistence of human beings, industries, and cities in the new cultural ecological environment of the 21st century by exploring and clarifying the interaction and function of different elements in different stages of evolution. Finally, this study not only makes up for the current lack of research on Shiwan’s cultural ecology, but also provides meaningful reference for environmental reform in other industrialized cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Liting Zhou & Xiaomei Zou & Yongnan Huang & Yiyong Li & Luyao Guo & Junyu Fu, 2023. "Inheritance and Innovation of Pottery Sculpture Technique in Shiwan, China: A Grounded Study from Cultural Ecology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3344-:d:1068176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3344/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3344/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nan Yang & Xiaoge Zang & Cong Chen, 2022. "Inheritance Patterns under Cultural Ecology Theory for the Sustainable Development of Traditional Handicrafts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Bruno Marques & Claire Freeman & Lynette Carter & Maibritt Pedersen Zari, 2020. "Sense of Place and Belonging in Developing Culturally Appropriate Therapeutic Environments: A Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Kosanic, Aleksandra & Petzold, Jan, 2020. "A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qinghua He & Xin Zheng & Xin Xiao & Lei Luo & Hui Lin & Shan He, 2023. "The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of the Ceramics Industry in Jingdezhen in the Last 40 Years," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goyette, Jean-Olivier & Mendes, Poliana & Cimon-Morin, Jérôme & Dupras, Jérôme & Pellerin, Stéphanie & Rousseau, Alain N. & Poulin, Monique, 2024. "Using the ecosystem serviceshed concept in conservation planning for more equitable outcomes," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Tianxiong Wang & Zhiqi Ma & Liu Yang, 2023. "Creativity and Sustainable Design of Wickerwork Handicraft Patterns Based on Artificial Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Siyou Wang & Shaotao Chen & Wei Gao, 2022. "Information Services as a Method to Evaluate the Sustainability of Intangible Dimensions of a Historic Urban Landscape: A Case Study in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Márquez, Laura Andreina Matos & Rezende, Eva Caroline Nunes & Machado, Karine Borges & Nascimento, Emilly Layne Martins do & Castro, Joana D'arc Bardella & Nabout, João Carlos, 2023. "Trends in valuation approaches for cultural ecosystem services: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Manley, Kyle & Nyelele, Charity & Egoh, Benis N., 2022. "A review of machine learning and big data applications in addressing ecosystem service research gaps," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    6. Beatriz E. Murillo-López & Antonio J. Castro & Alexander Feijoo-Martínez, 2022. "Nature’s Contributions to People Shape Sense of Place in the Coffee Cultural Landscape of Colombia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Rey-Valette, Hélène & Salles, Jean-Michel & Blayac, Thierry, 2024. "Perceptions of Ecosystem Services and Bonds with Nature: The Case of Fish-Farming Ponds in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    8. Jianxiu Yang & Xing Ma & Xueyan Zhao & Wenqing Li, 2022. "Spatiotemporal of the Coupling Relationship between Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being in Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Clara Tattoni & Gianluca Grilli & Jorge Araña & Marco Ciolli, 2021. "The Landscape Change in the Alps—What Postcards Have to Say about Aesthetic Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Cabrini, Silvina María & Cristechec, Estele Raquel & Pace Guerreroc, Ignacio Raul & Bitara,María Victoria, 2023. "Rural Landscape Simplification and Provision of Cultural Ecosystem Services. A Case Study in the Argentine Pampas," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 23(01), June.
    11. Bruno Marques & Claire Freeman & Lyn Carter, 2021. "Adapting Traditional Healing Values and Beliefs into Therapeutic Cultural Environments for Health and Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Maria Hofman-Bergholm, 2022. "Storytelling as an Educational Tool in Sustainable Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Tebeje Molla, 2023. "Racial Othering and Relational Wellbeing: African Refugee Youth in Australia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, November.
    14. Richter, Franziska & Jan, Pierrick & El Benni, Nadja & Lüscher, Andreas & Buchmann, Nina & Klaus, Valentin H., 2021. "A guide to assess and value ecosystem services of grasslands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    15. Bruno Marques & Claire Freeman & Lyn Carter & Maibritt Pedersen Zari, 2021. "Conceptualising Therapeutic Environments through Culture, Indigenous Knowledge and Landscape for Health and Well-Being," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Nowak-Olejnik, Agnieszka & Schirpke, Uta & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2022. "A systematic review on subjective well-being benefits associated with cultural ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    17. Indunee Welivita & Simon Willcock & Amy Lewis & Dilshaad Bundhoo & Tim Brewer & Sarah Cooper & Kenneth Lynch & Sneha Mekala & Prajna Paramita Mishra & Kongala Venkatesh & Dolores Rey Vicario & Paul Hu, 2021. "Evidence of Similarities in Ecosystem Service Flow across the Rural-Urban Spectrum," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-38, April.
    18. Liangjian Yang & Kaijun Cao, 2022. "Cultural Ecosystem Services Research Progress and Future Prospects: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Jianzhen Zhang & Ziyang Wang & Collins Opoku Antwi & Xiaoyu Liang & Jiahao Ge, 2022. "Geospatial Thinking and Sense of Place: The Mediating Role of Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Xiang Gao & Zao Li & Xia Sun, 2023. "Relevance between Tourist Behavior and the Spatial Environment in Huizhou Traditional Villages—A Case Study of Pingshan Village, Yi County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3344-:d:1068176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.