IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p3115-d1064235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscape Aesthetic Value of Waterfront Green Space Based on Space–Psychology–Behavior Dimension: A Case Study along Qiantang River (Hangzhou Section)

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojia Liu

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Xi Chen

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou 311302, China)

  • Yan Huang

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Weihong Wang

    (Institute of Computer Network Application, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Mingkan Zhang

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Yang Jin

    (School of Design and Architecture, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

Abstract

As an important part of urban green infrastructure, the landscape effect of the urban waterfront green space varies, and sometimes, the green space with an excellent landscape aesthetic value fails to serve the needs of most citizens. This seriously affects the construction of a green ecological civilization and the implementation of the concept of “common prosperity” in China. Based on multi-source data, this study took the Qiantang River Basin as an example, selected 12 representative waterfront green spaces along the river as the research objects, and used qualitative and quantitative analysis methods to determine the landscape aesthetic value of the research area from the different dimensions of space, psychology, and physiology. We examined the relationship between each dimension so as to objectively and comprehensively reflect the landscape value characteristics of the waterfront green space in the study area and provide a reasonable theoretical framework and practical development path for future urban waterfront green space landscape design. We obtained the following results: (1) The results of the spatial dimension research indicated that the spatial value index of the waterfront green space in the study area was three-dimensional space > vertical space > horizontal space, and the overall spatial value was low; Qianjiang Ecological Park obtained the highest value (0.5473), and Urban Balcony Park obtained the lowest value (0.4619). (2) The results of the psychological dimension indicated that people’s perceptions of the waterfront green space in the study area were relatively weak, mainly focusing on visual perception, but the waterfront green space with a relative emotional value greater than one accounted for 75%, and the overall recognition of the landscape was high. (3) The results of the behavioral dimension showed that the overall heat of the waterfront green space in the study area was insufficient (1.3719–7.1583), which was mainly concentrated in low-heat levels, and the population density was unevenly distributed (0.0014–0.0663), which was mainly concentrated in the medium-density level. The main purpose of users was to visit, and they stayed an average of 1.5 h. (4) The results of the coupling coordination analysis of the spatial–psychological–behavioral dimensions showed that the landscape value of the waterfront green space in the study area presented a form of ‘high coupling degree and low coordination degree’.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojia Liu & Xi Chen & Yan Huang & Weihong Wang & Mingkan Zhang & Yang Jin, 2023. "Landscape Aesthetic Value of Waterfront Green Space Based on Space–Psychology–Behavior Dimension: A Case Study along Qiantang River (Hangzhou Section)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3115-:d:1064235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shumei Zhang & Wenshi Zhang & Ying Wang & Xiaoyu Zhao & Peihao Song & Guohang Tian & Audrey L. Mayer, 2020. "Comparing Human Activity Density and Green Space Supply Using the Baidu Heat Map in Zhengzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Jisoo Sim & Patrick Miller & Samarth Swarup, 2020. "Tweeting the High Line Life: A Social Media Lens on Urban Green Spaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Tao Wu & Peipei Zha & Mengjie Yu & Guojun Jiang & Jianzhen Zhang & Qinglong You & Xuefeng Xie, 2021. "Landscape Pattern Evolution and Its Response to Human Disturbance in a Newly Metropolitan Area: A Case Study in Jin-Yi Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Siya Cheng & Zheran Zhai & Wenzhuo Sun & Yuan Wang & Rui Yu & Xiaoyu Ge, 2022. "Research on the Satisfaction of Beijing Waterfront Green Space Landscape Based on Social Media Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-25, October.
    5. Yunfang Jiang & Jing Huang & Tiemao Shi & Hongxiang Wang, 2021. "Interaction of Urban Rivers and Green Space Morphology to Mitigate the Urban Heat Island Effect: Case-Based Comparative Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-29, October.
    6. Anne Taufen & Ken Yocom, 2021. "Transitions in Urban Waterfronts: Imagining, Contesting, and Sustaining the Aquatic/Terrestrial Interface," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Chenjing Wu & Xianyou He, 2021. "Environmental Aesthetic Value Influences the Intention for Moral Behavior: Changes in Behavioral Moral Judgment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Aleksandra Djukić & Jelena Marić & Branislav Antonić & Vladimir Kovač & Jugoslav Joković & Nikola Dinkić, 2020. "The Evaluation of Urban Renewal Waterfront Development: The Case of the Sava Riverfront in Belgrade, Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Gyula Kothencz & Ronald Kolcsár & Pablo Cabrera-Barona & Péter Szilassi, 2017. "Urban Green Space Perception and Its Contribution to Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Deyi Feng & Lingli Tu & Zhongwei Sun, 2019. "Research on Population Spatiotemporal Aggregation Characteristics of a Small City: A Case Study on Shehong County Based on Baidu Heat Maps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Huie Li & Chang You & Jin Li & Mei Li & Min Tan & Guanfei Zhang & Yiping Zhong, 2022. "Influence of Environmental Aesthetic Value and Anticipated Emotion on Pro-Environmental Behavior: An ERP Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Qiao Zhang & Jooho Lee & Bin Jiang & Gunwoo Kim, 2022. "Revitalization of the Waterfront Park Based on Industrial Heritage Using Post-Occupancy Evaluation—A Case Study of Shanghai (China)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-28, July.
    13. Yisheng Peng & Jiahui Liu & Tianyao Zhang & Xiangyang Li, 2021. "The Relationship between Urban Population Density Distribution and Land Use in Guangzhou, China: A Spatial Spillover Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Shan Gao & Songfu Liu, 2021. "Exploration and Analysis of the Aesthetic Cognitive Schema of Contemporary Western Urban Landscapes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-12, May.
    15. Linjia Wu & Qidi Dong & Shixian Luo & Wenyuan Jiang & Ming Hao & Qibing Chen, 2021. "Effects of Spatial Elements of Urban Landscape Forests on the Restoration Potential and Preference of Adolescents," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Mikaël J. A. Maes & Monica Pirani & Elizabeth R. Booth & Chen Shen & Ben Milligan & Kate E. Jones & Mireille B. Toledano, 2021. "Benefit of woodland and other natural environments for adolescents’ cognition and mental health," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(10), pages 851-858, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongyu Gong & Xiaozihan Wang & Zihao Wang & Ziyi Liu & Qiushan Li & Yunhan Zhang, 2022. "How Did the Built Environment Affect Urban Vibrancy? A Big Data Approach to Post-Disaster Revitalization Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Mohamed Fomba & Zinash Delebo Osunde & Souleymane Sidi Traoré & Appollonia Okhimamhe & Janina Kleemann & Christine Fürst, 2024. "Urban Green Spaces in Bamako and Sikasso, Mali: Land Use Changes and Perceptions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Wei Mo & Mingyang Sun & Tong Liu, 2024. "Mapping Green View Index for Urban Parks with Varied Landscape Metrics and Distances toward the Chinese Eastern Railway Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Fuhao & Chang, Yu-Fang, 2023. "Towards net-zero emissions: Can green bond policy promote green innovation and green space?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    5. Sari Suomalainen & Outi Tahvonen & Helena Kahiluoto, 2022. "From Participation to Involvement in Urban Open Space Management and Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Jaloliddin Rustamov & Zahiriddin Rustamov & Nazar Zaki, 2023. "Green Space Quality Analysis Using Machine Learning Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Zhen Yang & Weijun Gao, 2022. "Evaluating the Coordinated Development between Urban Greening and Economic Growth in Chinese Cities during 2005 to 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-25, August.
    8. Xueling Zhang & Ruoxuan Huang & Yixuan Yang, 2022. "On the Landscape Activity Measure Coupling Ecological Index and Public Vitality Index of UGI: The Case Study of Zhongshan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-32, October.
    9. Juraj Illes & Katarina Kristianova & Viera Joklova & Aida Shayegani, 2024. "Potential of Former Mill Race Corridors for Urban Regeneration Strategies—A Case Study from Podolínec in Prešov Region (Slovakia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Karolina Dudzic-Gyurkovich, 2023. "Study of Centrality Measures in the Network of Green Spaces in the City of Krakow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.
    11. Ningcheng Gao & Hui Zhang & Pei Wang & Ling Ning & Nyuk Hien Wong & Haibo Yu & Zikang Ke, 2023. "Research on Microclimate-Suitable Spatial Patterns of Waterfront Settlements in Summer: A Case Study of the Nan Lake Area in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    12. Qian Dong & Qiuliang Zhang, 2022. "The Estimation of a Remote Sensing Model of Three-Dimensional Green Space Quantity and Research into Its Cooling Effect in Hohhot, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Chenjing Wu & Fuqun Liang & Xiaoling Liang & Chuangbing Huang & Hua Wang & Xianyou He & Wei Zhang & Don Rojas & Yan Duan, 2021. "Spacious Environments Make Us Tolerant—The Role of Emotion and Metaphor," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Zihan Kan & Mei-Po Kwan & Mee Kam Ng & Hendrik Tieben, 2022. "The Impacts of Housing Characteristics and Built-Environment Features on Mental Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Jinyao Lin & Yaye Zhuang & Yang Zhao & Hua Li & Xiaoyu He & Siyan Lu, 2022. "Measuring the Non-Linear Relationship between Three-Dimensional Built Environment and Urban Vitality Based on a Random Forest Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Chenying Li & Tiantian Zhang & Xi Wang & Zefeng Lian, 2022. "Site Selection of Urban Parks Based on Fuzzy-Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP): A Case Study of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-27, October.
    17. Zhenrao Cai & Dan Gao & Xin Xiao & Linguo Zhou & Chaoyang Fang, 2023. "The Flow of Green Exercise, Its Characteristics, Mechanism, and Pattern in Urban Green Space Networks: A Case Study of Nangchang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Rui Chen & Yu Gao & Ruixin Zhang & Zhi Zhang & Weikang Zhang & Huan Meng & Tong Zhang, 2023. "How Does the Experience of Forest Recreation Spaces in Different Seasons Affect the Physical and Mental Recovery of Users?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-24, January.
    19. Yingxue Rao & Yi Zhong & Qingsong He & Jingyi Dai, 2022. "Assessing the Equity of Accessibility to Urban Green Space: A Study of 254 Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    20. Huaibin Wei & Liyuan Zhang & Jing Liu, 2022. "Hydrodynamic Modelling and Flood Risk Analysis of Urban Catchments under Multiple Scenarios: A Case Study of Dongfeng Canal District, Zhengzhou," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3115-:d:1064235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.