IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p2989-d1062020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time to Lift up COVID-19 Restrictions? Public Support towards Living with the Virus Policy and Associated Factors among Hong Kong General Public

Author

Listed:
  • Phoenix K. H. Mo

    (Centre for Health Behaviours Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yanqiu Yu

    (School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200030, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mason M. C. Lau

    (Centre for Health Behaviours Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Rachel H. Y. Ling

    (Centre for Health Behaviours Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Joseph T. F. Lau

    (Centre for Health Behaviours Research, Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
    Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Affiliated Wenzhou Kangning Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
    School of Mental Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China
    School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 311100, China)

Abstract

The fifth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic has caused an unprecedented toll on Hong Kong. As more countries are starting to lift COVID-19 restrictions, it would be important to understand the public attitudes towards lifting COVID-19 restrictions and to identify its associated factors. The present study examined the level of support towards the living with the virus (LWV) policy for COVID-19 among the public in Hong Kong and to identify the associations between resilient coping, self-efficacy and emotional distress with support towards the LWV policy. A random population-based telephone survey was conducted among 500 Hong Kong Chinese adults from 7 March to 19 April 2022, i.e., during the fifth wave of COVID-19 outbreak. Of the respondents, 39.6% showed a supportive attitude towards the LWV policy. Results from the structural equational modeling showed a positive correlation between resilient coping and self-efficacy. Resilient coping was associated with support towards the LWV policy directly and indirectly through a lower level of emotional distress. Self-efficacy had a direct association with support towards the LWV policy but its indirect association through emotional distress was not significant. Interventions that foster resilient coping and self-efficacy would be effective in reducing public emotional distress and promoting their positive view towards the LWV policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Phoenix K. H. Mo & Yanqiu Yu & Mason M. C. Lau & Rachel H. Y. Ling & Joseph T. F. Lau, 2023. "Time to Lift up COVID-19 Restrictions? Public Support towards Living with the Virus Policy and Associated Factors among Hong Kong General Public," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2989-:d:1062020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2989/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/2989/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yongdeng Lei & Jing’ai Wang & Yaojie Yue & Hongjian Zhou & Weixia Yin, 2014. "Rethinking the relationships of vulnerability, resilience, and adaptation from a disaster risk perspective," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 70(1), pages 609-627, January.
    2. Sai-fu Fung, 2020. "Validity of the Brief Resilience Scale and Brief Resilient Coping Scale in a Chinese Sample," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-9, February.
    3. Douglas W. Allen, 2022. "Covid-19 Lockdown Cost/Benefits: A Critical Assessment of the Literature," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 1-32, January.
    4. Xue Yang & Rui She & Mason MC Lau & Joseph TF Lau, 2020. "Anticipated socio-political developments and related personal responses as structural determinants of mental health problems: A population-based study," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(1), pages 58-66, February.
    5. Miles, David & Stedman, Mike & Heald, Adrian, 2020. "Living With Covid-19: Balancing Costs Against Benefits In The Face Of The Virus," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 253, pages 60-76, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Raquel Nunes, 2021. "Exploring the interactions between vulnerability, resilience and adaptation to extreme temperatures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2261-2293, December.
    2. Cheng-Hsien Hsieh, 2014. "Disaster risk assessment of ports based on the perspective of vulnerability," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 851-864, November.
    3. Sai-fu Fung & Esther Oi-wah Chow & Chau-kiu Cheung, 2020. "Development and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of a Brief Wisdom Development Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Duarte, Fabián & Jiménez-Molina, Álvaro, 2024. "Exploring the impact of social protest on mental health: A study of the 2019 “Social Uprising” in Chile," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    5. Gigi Foster & Paul Frijters, 2024. "Hiding the elephant: The tragedy of COVID policy and its economist apologists," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 106-144, March.
    6. Neptali M. Resurreccion, 2024. "Quality of Life and Resilience as Predictors of Mental Health among Police Officers," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(8), pages 4598-4646, August.
    7. Xue Yang & Shili Guo & Xin Deng & Dingde Xu, 2021. "Livelihood Adaptation of Rural Households under Livelihood Stress: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Nicholas Biddle & Matthew Gray & Ian McAllister, 2024. "Federalism and Confidence in Australian Governments During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 54(2), pages 257-282.
    9. Shimin Zhu & Yanqiong Zhuang & Patrick Ip, 2021. "Impacts on Children and Adolescents’ Lifestyle, Social Support and Their Association with Negative Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Arielle Kaim & Tuvia Gering & Amiram Moshaiov & Bruria Adini, 2021. "Deciphering the COVID-19 Health Economic Dilemma (HED): A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    11. Digby Race & Supriya Mathew & Matthew Campbell & Karl Hampton, 2016. "Understanding climate adaptation investments for communities living in desert Australia: experiences of indigenous communities," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 139(3), pages 461-475, December.
    12. Nelson Nyabanyi N-yanbini & Alfred Toku & Issaka Kanton Osumanu & Anthony Kwabena Sarfo, 2024. "Exploring agro-ecological implications and gendered adaptation to climate change in Northern Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 20485-20505, August.
    13. Gabriele Beccari & Matilde Giaccherini & Joanna Kopinska & Gabriele Rovigatti, 2023. "Refueling a Quiet Fire: Old Truthers and New Discontent in the Wake of Covid-19," CESifo Working Paper Series 10803, CESifo.
    14. Hongjian Zhou & Xi Wang & Jing’ai Wang, 2016. "A Way to Sustainability: Perspective of Resilience and Adaptation to Disaster," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Makridis, Christos A., 2022. "When houses of worship go empty: The effects of state restrictions on well-being among religious adherents," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    16. Bianca Blum & Bernhard K. J. Neumärker, 2021. "Lessons from Globalization and the COVID-19 Pandemic for Economic, Environmental and Social Policy," World, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-26, June.
    17. López-Mendoza, Héctor & González-Álvarez, María A. & Montañés, Antonio, 2024. "Assessing the effectiveness of international government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    18. Xiaolong Xue & Liang Wang & Rebecca J. Yang, 2018. "Exploring the science of resilience: critical review and bibliometric analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(1), pages 477-510, January.
    19. Huicong Jia & Fang Chen & Enyu Du, 2021. "Adaptation to Disaster Risk—An Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-21, October.
    20. Caroline Michellier & Patrick Pigeon & Francois Kervyn & Eleonore Wolff, 2016. "Contextualizing vulnerability assessment: a support to geo-risk management in central Africa," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 82(1), pages 27-42, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:2989-:d:1062020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.