IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i2p1288-d1031609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Challenge and Threat Appraisal of Job Demands among Nurses: The Role of Matching Job Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa

    (Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg)

  • Philipp E. Sischka

    (Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg)

  • Georges Steffgen

    (Department of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, University of Luxembourg, L-4366 Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg)

Abstract

(1) Background: Empirical studies have started to examine employees’ subjective appraisals of job demands and their relations to employees’ health. However, knowledge of working conditions, which might contribute to how employees appraise specific job demands, is scarce. The present study aimed to examine predictors of nurses’ appraisals of job demands (i.e., time pressure, emotional demands, physical demands, and role ambiguity) as challenges and/or threats among corresponding job resources (i.e., autonomy, social support, physical resources, participation in decision-making). It also examined moderating effects of these predictors. (2) Methods: Cross-sectional data were collected via an online survey in a sample of 425 nurses working in Luxembourg. (3) Results: Multiple regression analyses indicated that matching job resources predicted nurses’ appraisal of job demands as challenging. Threat appraisal was predicted by three out of four kinds of job resources (i.e., autonomy, physical resources, participation in decision-making). However, the current study did not find any moderating effects between job demands and job resources on challenge/threat appraisals. (4) Conclusions: The present study identified domain-specific job resources that contribute to how employees perceive selected job demands. Accordingly, we encourage scholars and practitioners to align job demands with matching job resources to prevent nurses’ threat appraisal of job demands, and to promote their challenge appraisals.

Suggested Citation

  • Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa & Philipp E. Sischka & Georges Steffgen, 2023. "Predicting Challenge and Threat Appraisal of Job Demands among Nurses: The Role of Matching Job Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1288-:d:1031609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1288/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/2/1288/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georges Steffgen & Philipp E. Sischka & Martha Fernandez de Henestrosa, 2020. "The Quality of Work Index and the Quality of Employment Index: A Multidimensional Approach of Job Quality and Its Links to Well-Being at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. PORANCEA-RĂULEA Andreea Simina, 2023. "The Potential Of Work From Home For Determining Job Quality," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 18(1), pages 261-274, April.
    2. Davide Arcidiacono & Giorgio Piccitto, 2023. "Assessing Inclusivity Through Job Quality in Digital Plat‐Firms," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 239-250.
    3. Michał T. Tomczak & Joanna Maria Szulc & Małgorzata Szczerska, 2021. "Inclusive Communication Model Supporting the Employment Cycle of Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Kaori Fujishiro & Emily Q. Ahonen & Megan Winkler, 2022. "Investigating Employment Quality for Population Health and Health Equity: A Perspective of Power," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Gregor Murray & Dalia Gesualdi-Fecteau & Christian Lévesque & Nicolas Roby, 2023. "What makes work better or worse? An analytical framework," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(3), pages 305-322, August.
    6. Michele BAIOCCO & Martin BLAIS & Mariia SAMOILENKO & Line CHAMBERLAND & Isabel CÔTÉ, 2023. "Development of a composite job quality index for LGBTQ+ workers in Quebec (Canada)," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 162(2), pages 327-353, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:2:p:1288-:d:1031609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.