IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i13p6277-d1185150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Review of Areal Units and Adjacency Used in Bayesian Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Conditional Autoregressive Models in Health Research

Author

Listed:
  • Zemenu Tadesse Tessema

    (School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar P.O. Box 196, Ethiopia)

  • Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema

    (School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
    Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar P.O. Box 196, Ethiopia)

  • Susannah Ahern

    (School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

  • Arul Earnest

    (School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia)

Abstract

Advancements in Bayesian spatial and spatio-temporal modelling have been observed in recent years. Despite this, there are unresolved issues about the choice of appropriate spatial unit and adjacency matrix in disease mapping. There is limited systematic review evidence on this topic. This review aimed to address these problems. We searched seven databases to find published articles on this topic. A modified quality assessment tool was used to assess the quality of studies. A total of 52 studies were included, of which 26 (50.0%) were on infectious diseases, 10 (19.2%) on chronic diseases, 8 (15.5%) on maternal and child health, and 8 (15.5%) on other health-related outcomes. Only 6 studies reported the reasons for using the specified spatial unit, 8 (15.3%) studies conducted sensitivity analysis for prior selection, and 39 (75%) of the studies used Queen contiguity adjacency. This review highlights existing variation and limitations in the specification of Bayesian spatial and spatio-temporal models used in health research. We found that majority of the studies failed to report the rationale for the choice of spatial units, perform sensitivity analyses on the priors, or evaluate the choice of neighbourhood adjacency, all of which can potentially affect findings in their studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zemenu Tadesse Tessema & Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema & Susannah Ahern & Arul Earnest, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Areal Units and Adjacency Used in Bayesian Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Conditional Autoregressive Models in Health Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-24, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:13:p:6277-:d:1185150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/13/6277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/13/6277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timotheus B. Darikwa & Samuel O. Manda, 2020. "Spatial Co-Clustering of Cardiovascular Diseases and Select Risk Factors among Adults in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Ropo E. Ogunsakin & Themba G. Ginindza, 2022. "Bayesian Spatial Modeling of Diabetes and Hypertension: Results from the South Africa General Household Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Ivan C Hanigan & Thomas Cochrane & Rachel Davey, 2017. "Impact of scale of aggregation on associations of cardiovascular hospitalization and socio-economic disadvantage," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Cindy Xin Feng, 2015. "Bayesian joint modeling of correlated counts data with application to adverse birth outcomes," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 1206-1222, June.
    5. Julian Besag & Jeremy York & Annie Mollié, 1991. "Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 43(1), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Elorm Donkor & Matthew Kelly & Cecilia Eliason & Charles Amotoh & Darren J. Gray & Archie C. A. Clements & Kinley Wangdi, 2021. "A Bayesian Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Malaria in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana from 2015 to 2019," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Jian Kang & Nanhua Zhang & Ran Shi, 2014. "A Bayesian nonparametric model for spatially distributed multivariate binary data with application to a multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 981-992, December.
    8. Win Wah & Susannah Ahern & Arul Earnest, 2020. "A systematic review of Bayesian spatial–temporal models on cancer incidence and mortality," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(5), pages 673-682, June.
    9. Mohammad Samsul Alam & Syed Shahadat Hossain & Farha Ferdous Sheela, 2019. "Spatial smoothing of low birth weight rate in Bangladesh using Bayesian hierarchical model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(10), pages 1870-1885, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema & Zemenu Tadesse Tessema & Stephane Heritier & Rob G. Stirling & Arul Earnest, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Joint Spatial and Spatiotemporal Models in Health Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Katherine Wilson & Jon Wakefield, 2022. "A probabilistic model for analyzing summary birth history data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(11), pages 291-344.
    3. Eibich, Peter & Ziebarth, Nicolas, 2014. "Examining the Structure of Spatial Health Effects in Germany Using Hierarchical Bayes Models," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 49, pages 305-320.
    4. Shreosi Sanyal & Thierry Rochereau & Cara Nichole Maesano & Laure Com-Ruelle & Isabella Annesi-Maesano, 2018. "Long-Term Effect of Outdoor Air Pollution on Mortality and Morbidity: A 12-Year Follow-Up Study for Metropolitan France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-8, November.
    5. Mayer Alvo & Jingrui Mu, 2023. "COVID-19 Data Analysis Using Bayesian Models and Nonparametric Geostatistical Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    6. Gil, Guilherme Dôco Roberti & Costa, Marcelo Azevedo & Lopes, Ana Lúcia Miranda & Mayrink, Vinícius Diniz, 2017. "Spatial statistical methods applied to the 2015 Brazilian energy distribution benchmarking model: Accounting for unobserved determinants of inefficiencies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 373-383.
    7. Vanessa Santos-Sánchez & Juan Antonio Córdoba-Doña & Javier García-Pérez & Antonio Escolar-Pujolar & Lucia Pozzi & Rebeca Ramis, 2020. "Cancer Mortality and Deprivation in the Proximity of Polluting Industrial Facilities in an Industrial Region of Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Berti, Patrizia & Dreassi, Emanuela & Rigo, Pietro, 2014. "Compatibility results for conditional distributions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 190-203.
    9. Louise Choo & Stephen G. Walker, 2008. "A new approach to investigating spatial variations of disease," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 171(2), pages 395-405, April.
    10. Young‐Geun Choi & Lawrence P. Hanrahan & Derek Norton & Ying‐Qi Zhao, 2022. "Simultaneous spatial smoothing and outlier detection using penalized regression, with application to childhood obesity surveillance from electronic health records," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 324-336, March.
    11. Zhengyi Zhou & David S. Matteson & Dawn B. Woodard & Shane G. Henderson & Athanasios C. Micheas, 2015. "A Spatio-Temporal Point Process Model for Ambulance Demand," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 6-15, March.
    12. Eric C. Tassone & Marie Lynn Miranda & Alan E. Gelfand, 2010. "Disaggregated spatial modelling for areal unit categorical data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 59(1), pages 175-190, January.
    13. Junming Li & Xiulan Han & Xiao Li & Jianping Yang & Xuejiao Li, 2018. "Spatiotemporal Patterns of Ground Monitored PM 2.5 Concentrations in China in Recent Years," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Sanjay Chaudhuri & Debashis Mondal & Teng Yin, 2017. "Hamiltonian Monte Carlo sampling in Bayesian empirical likelihood computation," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(1), pages 293-320, January.
    15. Dolores Catelan & Annibale Biggeri & Corrado Lagazio, 2009. "On the clustering term in ecological analysis: how do different prior specifications affect results?," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 18(1), pages 49-61, March.
    16. Massimo Bilancia & Giacomo Demarinis, 2014. "Bayesian scanning of spatial disease rates with integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA)," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 23(1), pages 71-94, March.
    17. Douglas R. M. Azevedo & Marcos O. Prates & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, 2021. "MSPOCK: Alleviating Spatial Confounding in Multivariate Disease Mapping Models," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(3), pages 464-491, September.
    18. Bondo, Kristin J. & Rosenberry, Christopher S. & Stainbrook, David & Walter, W. David, 2024. "Comparing risk of chronic wasting disease occurrence using Bayesian hierarchical spatial models and different surveillance types," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 493(C).
    19. Edgar Santos‐Fernandez & Erin E. Peterson & Julie Vercelloni & Em Rushworth & Kerrie Mengersen, 2021. "Correcting misclassification errors in crowdsourced ecological data: A Bayesian perspective," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 147-173, January.
    20. Ying C. MacNab, 2018. "Some recent work on multivariate Gaussian Markov random fields," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 27(3), pages 497-541, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:13:p:6277-:d:1185150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.