IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i12p6131-d1171850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engaging Industry in Health Professions’ Education: Benefits and Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Belinda Kenny

    (School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • David O'Connor

    (Community Health Care, Primary Care Community Health, Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Penrith, NSW 2750, Australia)

  • Ellie Sugden

    (School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Clarice Y. Tang

    (Physiotherapy, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia)

  • Caterina Tannous

    (School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

  • Elizabeth Thyer

    (School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia)

Abstract

Effective partnerships between universities and industry facilitate health-profession students’ learning and work readiness. However, developing sustainable industry engagement in academic curricula remains challenging. This study utilised Social Exchange Theory (SET) to explore the benefits of and barriers to industry engagement within health-profession preparation programs. A realist evaluation framework was used to consider factors that impacted experiences and outcomes for academics and clinicians who engaged in the development and delivery of curriculum for a new health professional preparation program in speech pathology. A sequential mixed-methods design was adopted to explore factors influencing clinicians’ motivation to engage with the university, using an online survey ( n = 18) and focus group ( n = 5). Clinicians rated “personal development” and contributing to the “future workforce” as the highest personal benefits. “Sharing knowledge” was the highest team benefit, and “staff satisfaction” was the highest employer benefit. Time and workload were perceived barriers. Academics ( n = 2) and clinicians ( n = 3) who collaborated in learning and teaching experiences also participated in a post-engagement focus group. Three Context Mechanism Outcome configurations were shown to facilitate engagement outcomes: engagement as opportunity, partnership, and work readiness. In accordance with SET, the nature of exchange processes and professional relationships contributed to positive engagement outcomes for clinicians, academics, and enhanced health-profession education.

Suggested Citation

  • Belinda Kenny & David O'Connor & Ellie Sugden & Clarice Y. Tang & Caterina Tannous & Elizabeth Thyer, 2023. "Engaging Industry in Health Professions’ Education: Benefits and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-23, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:12:p:6131-:d:1171850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/12/6131/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/12/6131/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Cosgrave, 2020. "The Whole-of-Person Retention Improvement Framework: A Guide for Addressing Health Workforce Challenges in the Rural Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Bstieler, Ludwig & Hemmert, Martin & Barczak, Gloria, 2017. "The changing bases of mutual trust formation in inter-organizational relationships: A dyadic study of university-industry research collaborations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 47-54.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anders Melander & Tomas Mullern & David Anderssson & Fredrik Elgh & Malin Löfving, 2022. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap in Collaborative Research—in Dialogues We Trust," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 655-677, October.
    2. A. E. Rodríguez Salazar & M. A. Domínguez-Crespo & A. M. Torres-Huerta & A. I. Licona-Aguilar & A. Nivón-Pellón & V. N. Orta-Guzmán, 2021. "Analysis of the Dynamical Capabilities into the Public Research Institutes to Their Strategic Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Musarra, Giuseppe & Kadile, Vita & Zaefarian, Ghasem & Oghazi, Pejvak & Najafi-Tavani, Zhaleh, 2022. "Emotions, culture intelligence, and mutual trust in technology business relationships," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. De Silva, Muthu & Rossi, Federica & Yip, Nick K.T. & Rosli, Ainurul, 2021. "Does affective evaluation matter for the success of university-industry collaborations? A sentiment analysis of university-industry collaborative project reports," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Demetris Vrontis & Jaroslav Belas & Alkis Thrassou & Gabriele Santoro & Michael Christofi, 2023. "Strategic agility, openness and performance: a mixed method comparative analysis of firms operating in developed and emerging markets," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1365-1398, May.
    6. Catherine Cosgrave, 2020. "Context Matters: Findings from a Qualitative Study Exploring Service and Place Factors Influencing the Recruitment and Retention of Allied Health Professionals in Rural Australian Public Health Servic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Mohammad Azizi & Masood Salmani Bidgoli & Ameneh Seddighian Bidgoli, 2017. "Trust in family businesses: A more comprehensive empirical review," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1359445-135, January.
    8. Hong Liu & Zhihua Liu & Yongzeng Lai & Lin Li, 2021. "Factors Influencing Collaborative Innovation Project Performance: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Chelsey Kirkland & Kari Oldfield-Tabbert & Harshada Karnik & Jason Orr & Skky Martin & Jonathon P. Leider, 2022. "Public Health Workforce Gaps, Impacts, and Improvement Strategies from COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-13, October.
    10. Hiba Khan & Amber & Shaikh Maria Tabassum & Urooj Saghir, 2024. "Optimizing Employee Well-Being through Occupational Therapy Interventions: Assessing the Role of Work Environment Adaptation," Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 13(3), pages 178-183.
    11. Caroline Crossley & Marjorie Collett & Sandra C. Thompson, 2023. "Tracks to Postgraduate Rural Practice: Longitudinal Qualitative Follow-Up of Nursing Students Who Undertook a Rural Placement in Western Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Emma V. Taylor & Rosalie D. Thackrah & Sandra C. Thompson, 2022. "Improving Access to Cancer Treatment Services in Australia’s Northern Territory—History and Progress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Bojan Ćudić & Peter Alešnik & David Hazemali, 2022. "Factors impacting university–industry collaboration in European countries," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Clauss, Thomas & Kesting, Tobias & Franco, Matheus, 2024. "Innovation generation through formalisation and fairness in university – Industry collaboration," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    15. Sajjad Nazir & Wang Qun & Li Hui & Amina Shafi, 2018. "Influence of Social Exchange Relationships on Affective Commitment and Innovative Behavior: Role of Perceived Organizational Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Liu, Ran & Ford, John B. & Zhang, Weiyong & Bonnici, Joseph, 2023. "Reappraising the roles of review valence and conflict in online relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    17. Carsten Schultz & Oliver Gretsch & Alexander Kock, 2021. "The influence of shared R&D-project innovativeness perceptions on university-industry collaboration performance," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1144-1172, August.
    18. Artūras Kaklauskas & Audrius Banaitis & Fernando A. F. Ferreira & João J. M. Ferreira & Dilanthi Amaratunga & Natalija Lepkova & Ieva Ubartė & Nerija Banaitienė, 2018. "An Evaluation System for University–Industry Partnership Sustainability: Enhancing Options for Entrepreneurial Universities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Zahoor, Nadia & Gabriel Pepple, Dennis & Choudrie, Jyoti, 2021. "Entrepreneurial competencies and alliance success: The role of external knowledge absorption and mutual trust," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 440-450.
    20. Yan Li & Yi Shi, 2022. "Dynamic Game Analysis of Enterprise Green Technology Innovation Ecosystem under Double Environmental Regulation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-33, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:12:p:6131-:d:1171850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.