IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v21y2024i2p141-d1327844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“A Huge Gap”: Health Care Provider Perspectives on Cancer Screening for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People in the Northern Territory

Author

Listed:
  • Emma V. Taylor

    (Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, Geraldton, WA 6530, Australia)

  • Sarah Dugdale

    (Health Statistics and Informatics, NT Health, Darwin, NT 0800, Australia)

  • Christine M. Connors

    (Public Health Division, NT Health, Darwin, NT 0800, Australia)

  • Gail Garvey

    (The School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia)

  • Sandra C. Thompson

    (Western Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, Geraldton, WA 6530, Australia)

Abstract

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the Northern Territory (NT). Accessible and culturally appropriate cancer screening programs are a vital component in reducing the burden of cancer. Primary health care plays a pivotal role in facilitating the uptake of cancer screening in the NT, due to the significant challenges caused by large distances, limited resources, and cultural differences. This paper analyses health care provider perspectives and approaches to the provision of cancer screening to Aboriginal people in the NT that were collected as part of a larger study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 50 staff from 15 health services, including 8 regional, remote, and very remote primary health care (PHC) clinics, 3 hospitals, a cancer centre, and 3 cancer support services. Transcripts were thematically analysed. Cancer screening by remote and very remote PHC clinics in the NT is variable, with some staff seeing cancer screening as a “huge gap”, while others see it as lower priority compared to other conditions due to a lack of resourcing and the overwhelming burden of acute and chronic disease. Conversely, some clinics see screening as an area where they are performing well, with systematic screening, targeted programs, and high screening rates. There was a large variation in perceptions of the breast screening and cervical screening programs. However, participants universally reported that the bowel screening kit was complicated and not culturally appropriate for their Aboriginal patients, which led to low uptake. System-level improvements are required, including increased funding and resourcing for screening programs, and for PHC clinics in the NT. Being appropriately resourced would assist PHC clinics to incorporate a greater emphasis on cancer screening into adult health checks and would support PHCs to work with local communities to co-design targeted cancer screening programs and culturally relevant education activities. Addressing these issues are vital for NT PHC clinics to address the existing cancer screening gaps and achieving the Australian Government pledge to be the first nation in the world to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem by 2035. The implementation of the National Lung Cancer Screening Program in 2025 also presents an opportunity to deliver greater benefits to Aboriginal communities and reduce the cancer burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Emma V. Taylor & Sarah Dugdale & Christine M. Connors & Gail Garvey & Sandra C. Thompson, 2024. "“A Huge Gap”: Health Care Provider Perspectives on Cancer Screening for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People in the Northern Territory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:141-:d:1327844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/2/141/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/21/2/141/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Cosgrave, 2020. "The Whole-of-Person Retention Improvement Framework: A Guide for Addressing Health Workforce Challenges in the Rural Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Emma V. Taylor & Rosalie D. Thackrah & Sandra C. Thompson, 2022. "Improving Access to Cancer Treatment Services in Australia’s Northern Territory—History and Progress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Emma V. Taylor & Marilyn Lyford & Lorraine Parsons & Michele Holloway & Karla Gough & Sabe Sabesan & Sandra C. Thompson, 2022. "Putting Policy into Practice: How Three Cancer Services Perform against Indigenous Health and Cancer Frameworks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shaila M. Strayhorn-Carter & Ken Batai & Francine C. Gachupin, 2024. "Types of Racism and Health Disparities and Inequalities among Cancer Patients: An Editorial Reflection of Articles in This Special Issue of IJERPH," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-8, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Catherine Cosgrave, 2020. "Context Matters: Findings from a Qualitative Study Exploring Service and Place Factors Influencing the Recruitment and Retention of Allied Health Professionals in Rural Australian Public Health Servic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-27, August.
    2. Chelsey Kirkland & Kari Oldfield-Tabbert & Harshada Karnik & Jason Orr & Skky Martin & Jonathon P. Leider, 2022. "Public Health Workforce Gaps, Impacts, and Improvement Strategies from COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Caroline Crossley & Marjorie Collett & Sandra C. Thompson, 2023. "Tracks to Postgraduate Rural Practice: Longitudinal Qualitative Follow-Up of Nursing Students Who Undertook a Rural Placement in Western Australia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Emma V. Taylor & Rosalie D. Thackrah & Sandra C. Thompson, 2022. "Improving Access to Cancer Treatment Services in Australia’s Northern Territory—History and Progress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Claire Ellen Seaman & Elyce Green & Kate Freire, 2022. "Effect of Rural Clinical Placements on Intention to Practice and Employment in Rural Australia: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Belinda Kenny & David O'Connor & Ellie Sugden & Clarice Y. Tang & Caterina Tannous & Elizabeth Thyer, 2023. "Engaging Industry in Health Professions’ Education: Benefits and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-23, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:21:y:2024:i:2:p:141-:d:1327844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.