IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i11p5971-d1157414.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partnership and Motivations for Starting a Family of One’s Own in the Opinions of Students with Disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Łukaszek

    (Department of Resocialization Pedagogy, Faculty of Pedagogy, University of Rzeszów, 35-010 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Zaborniak-Sobczak

    (Department of Disability Research, University of Rzeszów, 35-010 Rzeszów, Poland
    Psychological and Pedagogical Counselling Centre No 1 in Rzeszów, 35-005 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Remigiusz Kijak

    (Department of Disability Research, University of Rzeszów, 35-010 Rzeszów, Poland
    Department of Biomedical Foundations of Development and Sexology, University of Warsaw, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Creating and maintaining stable, happy intimate relationships is a right every individual has. Previous research has shown that people with disabilities are at risk of building unsatisfactory partner relationships. The aim of the study was to ascertain the beliefs of students with disabilities concerning their motives for starting families and, in regard to potential partners, their tolerance for risky life experiences and the personal qualities accepted. A cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 2847 university students in southeastern Poland. It was found that the following motives for entering into a permanent relationship were considered more important by students with disabilities than they were by students without disabilities: enhancement of self-esteem ( p = 0.001), high economic potential of a partner ( p = 0.007) and a shared system of values and interests ( p = 0.036). Love ( p = 0.031) and the mental qualities ( p = 0.010) of a partner were considered less important by students with disabilities than they were by students without disabilities. Moreover, students with disabilities are far more likely than students without disabilities to accept disability ( p < 0.001) in potential partners. They are also significantly more willing to enter into relationships with people who have risky life experiences, even in the form of violence against previous life partners ( p < 0.015) and children ( p = 0.001), addiction to alcohol ( p < 0.001) or drugs ( p = 0.01) and the resulting treatment, and those having served time in prison ( p = 0.034). Educational and institutional support for students with disabilities should be intensified with regard to partner selection being satisfactory to both partners.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Łukaszek & Małgorzata Zaborniak-Sobczak & Remigiusz Kijak, 2023. "Partnership and Motivations for Starting a Family of One’s Own in the Opinions of Students with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:11:p:5971-:d:1157414
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/5971/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/11/5971/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Howard, II., James P., 2016. "Meta-Analysis with R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(b01).
    2. María-Leticia Meseguer-Santamaría & Francisco Sánchez-Alberola & Manuel Vargas-Vargas, 2021. "Intimate Partner Violence against Women with Disabilities in Spain: A Public Health Problem," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Stern, Erin & van der Heijden, Ingrid & Dunkle, Kristin, 2020. "How people with disabilities experience programs to prevent intimate partner violence across four countries," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pamela Saleme & Tori Seydel & Bo Pang & Sameer Deshpande & Joy Parkinson, 2023. "An Integrative Literature Review of Interventions to Protect People with Disabilities from Domestic and Family Violence," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, January.
    2. Jun-Jun Yeh & Yu-Chiao Wang & Chia-Hung Kao, 2016. "Asthma–Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap Syndrome Associated with Risk of Pulmonary Embolism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Jill R. McTavish & Prabha S. Chandra & Donna E. Stewart & Helen Herrman & Harriet L. MacMillan, 2022. "Child Maltreatment and Intimate Partner Violence in Mental Health Settings," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Guadalupe Pastor-Moreno & Isabel Ruiz-Pérez & Luis Sordo & Jesús Henares-Montiel, 2022. "Frequency, Types, and Manifestations of Partner Sexual Violence, Non-Partner Sexual Violence and Sexual Harassment: A Population Study in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Sean Cowlishaw & Isabella Freijah & Dzenana Kartal & Alyssa Sbisa & Ashlee Mulligan & MaryAnn Notarianni & Anne-Laure Couineau & David Forbes & Meaghan O’Donnell & Andrea Phelps & Katherine M. Iverson, 2022. "Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) in Military and Veteran Populations: A Systematic Review of Population-Based Surveys and Population Screening Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Kwamina Abekah-Carter & George Ofosu Oti, 2022. "Perspectives of community members on homeless people with mental illness in Nsawam, Ghana," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 68(1), pages 196-202, February.
    7. Marchetti, Dalmo & Wanke, Peter F., 2019. "Efficiency in rail transport: Evaluation of the main drivers through meta-analysis with resampling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 83-100.
    8. Yanjia Li & Keyi Zhou & Siyuan Tang & Jiarui Chen, 2023. "Intimate Partner Violence Screening Instruments: A Protocol for a COSMIN-Based Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-9, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:11:p:5971-:d:1157414. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.