IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i10p5778-d1143658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shifts in Diabetes Health Literacy Policy and Practice in Australia—Promoting Organisational Health Literacy

Author

Listed:
  • Giuliana O. Murfet

    (School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
    Diabetes Centre, Tasmanian Health Service, Burnie, TAS 7320, Australia)

  • Shanshan Lin

    (School of Public Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Jan C. Ridd

    (Diabetes Australia, Turner, ACT 2612, Australia)

  • Gunhild H. Cremer

    (Diabetes Australia, Turner, ACT 2612, Australia)

  • Susan Davidson

    (Australian Diabetes Educators Association, Chifley, ACT 2606, Australia)

  • Danielle M. Muscat

    (Sydney Health Literacy Laboratory, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

Abstract

Improving organisational health literacy ensures people can navigate, understand and use essential health information and services. However, systematic reviews have identified limited evidence for practical approaches to implementing such organisational change, particularly at a national level. This study aimed to (a) investigate the approach taken by an Australian national diabetes organisation—Diabetes Australia, as the administrator of the National Diabetes Services Scheme (NDSS)—to improve organisational health literacy over a 15-year-period and (b) examine the impact of organisational changes on the health literacy demands of health information. We performed an environmental scan, examining the websites of the NDSS, Diabetes Australia and the Australian government for reports and position statements describing organisational health literacy policies and practices between 2006 and 2021. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) was applied to consecutively published NDSS diabetes self-care fact sheets (n = 20) to assess changes in the health literacy demands (understandability and actionability) of these fact sheets over the same period. We identified nine policies resulting in 24 health literacy practice changes or projects between 2006 and 2021, applied using a streamlined incremental approach and group reflexivity. The incremental approach focused on (1) increasing audience reach, (2) consistency and branding, (3) person-centred language and (4) the understandability and actionability of health information. The PEMAT scores of fact sheets improved between 2006 and 2021 for understandability (53% to 79%) and actionability (43% to 82%). Diabetes Australia’s information development process leveraging national policies, employing an incremental approach and group reflexivity has improved the health literacy demands of diabetes information and serves as a template for other organisations seeking to improve their organisational health literacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuliana O. Murfet & Shanshan Lin & Jan C. Ridd & Gunhild H. Cremer & Susan Davidson & Danielle M. Muscat, 2023. "Shifts in Diabetes Health Literacy Policy and Practice in Australia—Promoting Organisational Health Literacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5778-:d:1143658
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5778/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5778/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. V. Asharani & Jue Hua Lau & Kumarasan Roystonn & Fiona Devi & Wang Peizhi & Saleha Shafie & Sherilyn Chang & Anitha Jeyagurunathan & Chua Boon Yiang & Edimansyah Abdin & Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar & C, 2021. "Health Literacy and Diabetes Knowledge: A Nationwide Survey in a Multi-Ethnic Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Anita Trezona & Gill Rowlands & Don Nutbeam, 2018. "Progress in Implementing National Policies and Strategies for Health Literacy—What Have We Learned so Far?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    3. Elham Charoghchian Khorasani & Seyedeh Belin Tavakoly Sany & Hadi Tehrani & Hassan Doosti & Nooshin Peyman, 2020. "Review of Organizational Health Literacy Practice at Health Care Centers: Outcomes, Barriers and Facilitators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leena Paakkari & Minna Torppa & Joanna Mazur & Zuzana Boberova & Gorden Sudeck & Michal Kalman & Olli Paakkari, 2020. "A Comparative Study on Adolescents’ Health Literacy in Europe: Findings from the HBSC Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Shyam Sundar Budhathoki & Melanie Hawkins & Gerald Elsworth & Michael T. Fahey & Jeevan Thapa & Sandeepa Karki & Lila Bahadur Basnet & Paras K. Pokharel & Richard H. Osborne, 2022. "Use of the English Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) with Health Science University Students in Nepal: A Validity Testing Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Don Nutbeam & Diane Levin-Zamir & Gill Rowlands, 2018. "Health Literacy in Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-3, November.
    4. Shuaijun Guo & Xiaoming Yu & Orkan Okan, 2020. "Moving Health Literacy Research and Practice towards a Vision of Equity, Precision and Transparency," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Muath Jaafari & Abad Alzuman & Zaiba Ali & Ansarullah Tantry & Rahila Ali, 2023. "Organizational Health Behavior Index (OHBI): A Tool for Measuring Organizational Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-29, September.
    6. Lara Lindert & Lukas Kühn & Paulina Kuper & Kyung-Eun (Anna) Choi, 2022. "Organizational Health Literacy in the Context of Employee Health: An Expert-Panel-Guided Scoping Review Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-9, April.
    7. Carey Ann Mather & Christina Cheng & Tracy Douglas & Gerald Elsworth & Richard Osborne, 2022. "eHealth Literacy of Australian Undergraduate Health Profession Students: A Descriptive Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Natascha Stuermer & Saskia Maria De Gani & Anna-Sophia Beese & Jennifer Giovanoli Evack & Rebecca Jaks & Dunja Nicca, 2022. "Health Professionals’ Experience with the First Implementation of the Organizational Health Literacy Self-Assessment Tool for Primary Care (OHL Self-AsseT)—A Qualitative Reflexive Thematic Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Doris Schaeffer & Svea Gille & Klaus Hurrelmann, 2020. "Implementation of the National Action Plan Health Literacy in Germany—Lessons Learned," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Seyedeh Belin Tavakoly Sany & Hassan Doosti & Mehrsadat Mahdizadeh & Arezoo Orooji & Nooshin Peyman, 2021. "The Health Literacy Status and Its Role in Interventions in Iran: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Kristine Sørensen, 2022. "From Project-Based Health Literacy Data and Measurement to an Integrated System of Analytics and Insights: Enhancing Data-Driven Value Creation in Health-Literate Organizations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-8, October.
    12. Elham Charoghchian Khorasani & Seyedeh Belin Tavakoly Sany & Mehrsadat Mahdizadeh & Hassan Doosti & Hadi Tehrani & Mohammad Moghzi & Alireza Jafari & Nooshin Peyman, 2022. "Attributes of Organizational Health Literacy in Health Care Centers in Iran: A Qualitative Content Analysis Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5778-:d:1143658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.