IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2022i1p523-d1018132.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Training Programme for Developing Social and Personal Resources and Its Effects on the Perceived Stress Level in Adults in Daily Life—Study Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph Janka

    (Center for Public Health, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Tanja Stamm

    (Center for Medical Data Science, Institute of Outcomes Research, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria
    Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Georg Heinze

    (Center for Medical Data Science, Institute of Clinical Biometrics, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 23, 1090 Vienna, Austria)

  • Thomas E. Dorner

    (Center for Public Health, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090 Vienna, Austria
    Karl-Landsteiner Institute for Health Promotion Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit—Clementinum, Paltram 12, 3062 Kirchstetten, Austria)

Abstract

Persistent stress and insufficient coping strategies have negative consequences for physical and mental health. Teaching adults the skills needed to sustainably improve stress-buffering aspects of their character could contribute to the prevention of stress-related diseases. In this non-randomised, observational, prospective cohort study, participants of a training programme for developing social and personal skills, to which they previously self-assigned, are assessed. The 12-month training programme focuses on improving perceived stress level (primary outcome), health behaviour, presence of common somatic symptoms, satisfaction with life, quality of social relationships, and wellbeing by addressing life goals, meaning in life, sense of coherence, social and personal resources, and transcendence. Study participants are recruited from the training groups via the training organiser. Companions, persons with whom they share a close relationship, are recruited to assess the interpersonal diffusion effects of the training. Matched individuals not participating in the training are the control group. Parameter assessment follows a pre-, post-, and follow-up (6 months) design. Designed to improve health-related outcomes in adults by addressing personality characteristics and using Lozanov’s superlearning principles to improve learning efficiency, this training programme is, to the study team’s knowledge, the first of its kind. From a research perspective, the outcomes of this study can provide new insights into primary prevention of stress-related diseases and how the effects of these measures are passed on through common personal interaction. The trial has been pre-registered (registration number: NCT04165473).

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph Janka & Tanja Stamm & Georg Heinze & Thomas E. Dorner, 2022. "A Training Programme for Developing Social and Personal Resources and Its Effects on the Perceived Stress Level in Adults in Daily Life—Study Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-19, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:523-:d:1018132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/523/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/1/523/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonio SANDU, 2016. "Using the Pyramid of Neurological Levels in the Human Resources Motivation Management," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 31-44, December.
    2. Katharina Viktoria Stein & Wolfgang Rutz & Birgit Hladschik-Kermer & Thomas E. Dorner, 2022. "Tapping the Potential of Resilience to Support an Integrated and Person-Centred Approach to Health and Wellbeing—Developing a Simple Assessment Tool for Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2022:i:1:p:523-:d:1018132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.