IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i7p3967-d780452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of LEBA and RULA Based on Postural Load Criteria and Epidemiological Data on Musculoskeletal Disorders

Author

Listed:
  • Dohyung Kee

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea)

Abstract

Various observational methods have been developed and applied in industrial settings with the aim of preventing musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). This study aimed to compare the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA), a representative observational method, and the Loading on the Entire Body Assessment (LEBA), a newly developed tool for assessing postural loads and their association with MSDs. The two methods were compared in various categories, including general characteristics, risk levels, postural load criteria, association with MSDs, influencing factors, and inter- and intra-rater reliabilities based on relevant previous studies. The results showed that compared to the RULA, the LEBA was better at evaluating various factors affecting postural loads and assessing musculoskeletal loadings, was better correlated with various postural load criteria, could predict the association with MSDs more accurately, and had higher inter- and intra-rater reliabilities. Based on these comparisons, it seems that the LEBA may be better than the RULA for estimating postural stress and predicting the association with MSDs.

Suggested Citation

  • Dohyung Kee, 2022. "Comparison of LEBA and RULA Based on Postural Load Criteria and Epidemiological Data on Musculoskeletal Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-12, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3967-:d:780452
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3967/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/7/3967/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dohyung Kee, 2022. "Systematic Comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA Based on a Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Kyeong-Hee Choi & Dae-Min Kim & Min-Uk Cho & Chae-Won Park & Seoung-Yeon Kim & Min-Jung Kim & Yong-Ku Kong, 2020. "Application of AULA Risk Assessment Tool by Comparison with Other Ergonomic Risk Assessment Tools," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-9, September.
    3. Marta Gómez-Galán & Ángel-Jesús Callejón-Ferre & José Pérez-Alonso & Manuel Díaz-Pérez & Jesús-Antonio Carrillo-Castrillo, 2020. "Musculoskeletal Risks: RULA Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-52, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davide Gattamelata & Mario Fargnoli, 2022. "Development of a New Procedure for Evaluating Working Postures: An Application in a Manufacturing Company," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhamad Nurul Hisyam Yunus & Mohd Hafiidz Jaafar & Ahmad Sufril Azlan Mohamed & Nur Zaidi Azraai & Md. Sohrab Hossain, 2021. "Implementation of Kinetic and Kinematic Variables in Ergonomic Risk Assessment Using Motion Capture Simulation: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Dohyung Kee, 2022. "Systematic Comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA Based on a Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-23, January.
    3. Davide Gattamelata & Mario Fargnoli, 2022. "Development of a New Procedure for Evaluating Working Postures: An Application in a Manufacturing Company," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Richard Roberts & Teri Slade & Don Voaklander & Sebastian Straube & Liz Dennett & Carol Cancelliere & Christine Guptill & Linda Miller & Danielle Lemay & Melnard De Leon & Douglas P. Gross, 2023. "The Effectiveness of Workplace Musculoskeletal Injury Risk Factor Screening Tools for Reducing Injury: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, February.
    5. Esther Salmerón-Manzano & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2020. "Bibliometric Studies and Worldwide Research Trends on Global Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-5, August.
    6. Venkata Nagaraj Kakaraparthi & Karthik Vishwanathan & Bhavana Gadhavi & Ravi Shankar Reddy & Jaya Shanker Tedla & Mastour Saeed Alshahrani & Snehil Dixit & Kumar Gular & Gaffar Sarwar Zaman & Vamsi Kr, 2023. "Clinical Application of Rapid Upper Limb Assessment and Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire in Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Bibliometric Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Daniela Onofrejova & Miriam Andrejiova & Denisa Porubcanova & Hana Pacaiova & Lydia Sobotova, 2024. "A Case Study of Ergonomic Risk Assessment in Slovakia with Respect to EU Standard," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Amjad, Asim & Ikramullah Butt, Shahid & Agha, Mujtaba Hassan & Ahmad, Ayyaz & Zhang, Faping & Ahmad, Shamraiz, 2023. "Integrating Ergonomics and sustainability: A framework with LDA methodology and implementation roadmap," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    9. Yi-Lang Chen & Wen-Hua Luo, 2023. "Comparative Ergonomic Study Examining the Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Symptoms of Taiwanese and Thai Workers in a Tape Manufacturing Factory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Jerzy Grobelny & Rafał Michalski, 2020. "Preventing Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Manufacturing by Digital Human Modeling," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:7:p:3967-:d:780452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.