IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p2762-d1057568.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of Workplace Musculoskeletal Injury Risk Factor Screening Tools for Reducing Injury: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Roberts

    (School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada)

  • Teri Slade

    (Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada)

  • Don Voaklander

    (School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada)

  • Sebastian Straube

    (Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada)

  • Liz Dennett

    (John W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R7, Canada)

  • Carol Cancelliere

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada)

  • Christine Guptill

    (School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8M5, Canada)

  • Linda Miller

    (EWI Works, Edmonton, AB T6E 3N8, Canada)

  • Danielle Lemay

    (Occupational Hygiene & Product Safety, Suncor Energy, Calgary, AB T2P 3E3, Canada)

  • Melnard De Leon

    (Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada)

  • Douglas P. Gross

    (Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada)

Abstract

Introduction: Musculoskeletal injury (MSI) contributes to global health burdens. Effective MSI prevention is necessary. MSI risk factor screening tools can be used by employers to identify and mitigate occupational hazards. Rigorous synthesis of the effectiveness of these tools has not taken place. We synthesized literature on effectiveness of MSI risk factor screening tools for reducing injury through informing prevention interventions. Materials and Methods: A literature search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library (Trials), CINAHL, Scopus and PsycINFO databases was performed. Included studies required an analytic design, used an MSI risk factor screening tool to inform an intervention in a working-age population and reported an outcome of MSI development, injury or compensation/work absence. Data extraction and study quality rating (Downs and Black criteria) were completed. Studies were sub-categorized as having used a single MSI screening tool (single-tool) to inform an injury prevention intervention or involving multiple simultaneous screening tools (multiple-tool). Study outcomes were synthesized when possible. Results: Eighteen articles representing fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria. No high-quality studies were identified (maximum Downs and Black score of 19). Studies did not employ previously validated tools but instead, typically, those purpose-built for a single use. The results were inconsistent both when using tools alone and in combination with other tools. Outcome measure heterogeneity precluded meaningful meta-analysis. Conclusions: There is limited evidence regarding use of MSI risk factor screening tools for preventing injury. Rigorous studies that utilize previously validated tools are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Roberts & Teri Slade & Don Voaklander & Sebastian Straube & Liz Dennett & Carol Cancelliere & Christine Guptill & Linda Miller & Danielle Lemay & Melnard De Leon & Douglas P. Gross, 2023. "The Effectiveness of Workplace Musculoskeletal Injury Risk Factor Screening Tools for Reducing Injury: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2762-:d:1057568
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2762/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/2762/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dohyung Kee, 2022. "Systematic Comparison of OWAS, RULA, and REBA Based on a Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-23, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Gattamelata & Mario Fargnoli, 2022. "Development of a New Procedure for Evaluating Working Postures: An Application in a Manufacturing Company," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Daniela Onofrejova & Miriam Andrejiova & Denisa Porubcanova & Hana Pacaiova & Lydia Sobotova, 2024. "A Case Study of Ergonomic Risk Assessment in Slovakia with Respect to EU Standard," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Yi-Lang Chen & Wen-Hua Luo, 2023. "Comparative Ergonomic Study Examining the Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Symptoms of Taiwanese and Thai Workers in a Tape Manufacturing Factory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Dohyung Kee, 2022. "Comparison of LEBA and RULA Based on Postural Load Criteria and Epidemiological Data on Musculoskeletal Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-12, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:2762-:d:1057568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.