IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p2633-d757662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microbiology-Based Instruction during Prenatal Dental Visits Improves Perinatal Oral Health Literacy

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua J. Thomson

    (Division of Integrated Biomedical Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry, Detroit, MI 48062, USA)

  • Erin E. Relich

    (Division of Dental Hygiene, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry, Detroit, MI 48062, USA)

  • John R. Girdwood

    (Division of Student Affairs, University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI 48502, USA)

  • Divesh Byrappagari

    (Dental Public Health and Outreach, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry, Detroit, MI 48062, USA)

Abstract

To improve oral hygiene education, we evaluated the perception and potential impact of microbiology-focused oral hygiene instructions (OHI) given to pregnant patients. Dental hygienists provided this supplemental education and administered Saliva-Check Mutans (SCM) tests to pregnant patients ( n = 188) in Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) settings. Patients reported their self-perceived understanding of the relationship between oral bacteria and dental disease and returned postdelivery to receive a second SCM test and follow-up questionnaire ( n = 47). Prior to the hygienist instruction, 84% of participants understood that bacteria caused tooth decay, while only 36% understood they could transfer these bacteria to their children. After instruction, patient understanding increased to 97% and 95%, respectively. Participants attributed these increases to the hygienist’s explanation and SCM test. In postdelivery participants, >80% reported adherence to routine oral hygiene practices, and a significant decrease in patients with high-risk levels of salivary Streptococcus mutans was determined by SCM test ( p = 0.0253). Participants agreed that the SCM test (89%) and microbiology explanation (95%) should be provided to every pregnant patient. Evaluation of patient perception of this intervention highlights how focused instruction on the infectious nature of dental disease can increase perinatal oral health literacy. Microbiology-focused education should be given to pregnant patients to reduce oral health disparities.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua J. Thomson & Erin E. Relich & John R. Girdwood & Divesh Byrappagari, 2022. "Microbiology-Based Instruction during Prenatal Dental Visits Improves Perinatal Oral Health Literacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2633-:d:757662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2633/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2633/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chi, D.L. & Masterson, E.E. & Carle, A.C. & Mancl, L.A. & Coldwell, S.E., 2014. "Socioeconomic status, food security, and dental caries in us children: Mediation analyses of data from the national health and nutrition examination survey, 2007-2008," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(5), pages 860-864.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ewelina Chawłowska & Monika Karasiewicz & Agnieszka Lipiak & Rafał Staszewski & Mateusz Cofta & Maria Biskupska & Bogusz Giernaś & Agnieszka Zawiejska, 2022. "Oral Health Behaviours, Knowledge, and Literacy of Expectant Mothers: A Cross-Sectional Study among Maternity Ward Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Priscila Ramos & Estefanía Custodio & Sofía Jiménez & Alfredo J. Mainar-Causapé & Pierre Boulanger & Emanuele Ferrari, 2022. "Do agri-food market incentives improve food security and nutrition indicators? a microsimulation evaluation for Kenya," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 14(1), pages 209-227, February.
    2. James P. Ziliak & Craig Gundersen, 2016. "Multigenerational Families and Food Insecurity," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 82(4), pages 1147-1166, April.
    3. Kristan Elwell & Carolyn Camplain & Christine Kirby & Katharine Sanderson & Gloria Grover & Gerlinda Morrison & Amy Gelatt & Julie A. Baldwin, 2021. "A Formative Assessment of Social Determinants of Health Related to Early Childhood Caries in Two American Indian Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Michael A. Long & Lara Gonçalves & Paul B. Stretesky & Margaret Anne Defeyter, 2020. "Food Insecurity in Advanced Capitalist Nations: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Minsung Sohn & Sujin Park & Sungwon Lim & Hee-Jung Park, 2019. "Children’s Dental Sealant Use and Caries Prevalence Affected by National Health Insurance Policy Change: Evidence from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2007–2015)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Anqi Shen & Eduardo Bernabé & Wael Sabbah, 2020. "The Socioeconomic Inequality in Increment of Caries and Growth among Chinese Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-9, June.
    7. Deborah Schlichting & Ladan Hashemi & Cameron Grant, 2019. "Infant Food Security in New Zealand: A Multidimensional Index Developed from Cohort Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Dominique H. Como & Leah I. Stein Duker & José C. Polido & Sharon A. Cermak, 2019. "The Persistence of Oral Health Disparities for African American Children: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2633-:d:757662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.