IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p2538-d755819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient Perceptions on Receiving Vaccination Services through Community Pharmacies

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Kowalczuk

    (National Institute of Medicine, 00-725 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Alexandre Wong

    (Pharmacy Department, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada)

  • Kevin Chung

    (Pharmacy Department, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada)

  • Urszula Religioni

    (School of Public Health, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education of Warsaw, 01-826 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Dariusz Świetlik

    (Department of Biostatistics and Neural Networks, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-211 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Plagens-Rotman

    (Hipolit Cegielski State University of Applied Sciences, 61-485 Gniezno, Poland)

  • Jameason D. Cameron

    (Pharmacy Department, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada)

  • Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska

    (Chair and Department of Palliative Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-245 Poznan, Poland)

  • Katarina Fehir Šola

    (Pharmacy of Bjelovar, Petra Preradovića 4, 43000 Bjelovar, Croatia)

  • Justyna Kazmierczak

    (Zdrowit sp. z o.o., Pharmacy Chain, ul. Diamentowa 3, 41-940 Piekary Śląskie, Poland)

  • Eliza Blicharska

    (Department of Analytical Chemistry, Medical University of Lublin, Chodźki 4a, 20-093 Lublin, Poland)

  • Regis Vaillancourt

    (Pharmacy Department, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L1, Canada)

  • Piotr Merks

    (Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University, 01-815 Warszawa, Poland)

Abstract

(1) Introduction: Pharmacists are medical professionals who play an active role in the protection of public health. Since 2021, pharmacists with an appropriate certification have been authorised to administer vaccines against COVID-19. (2) Objective: The objective of this study was to ascertain the perceptions of patients about receiving vaccinations through community pharmacies. (3) Material and methods: This study was conducted in 2021. The research tool was an anonymous questionnaire published on the websites of patient organisations. Ultimately, 1062 patients participated in this study. (4) Results: This study shows that most of the respondents find community pharmacies more accessible than outpatient clinics (85.3%). Sixty-one percent of the respondents stated that getting vaccinated at pharmacies would be less time consuming than at outpatient clinics. Nearly every third respondent (29.5%) declared that they would get vaccinated if they received such a recommendation from a pharmacist. Fifty-six percent of the respondents were of the opinion that the administration of vaccines by pharmacists would relieve the burden on medical staff and the healthcare system. (5) Conclusions: Polish patients participating in the study have a positive attitude towards the implementation of vaccination services in community pharmacies as an effective way of combating infectious diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Kowalczuk & Alexandre Wong & Kevin Chung & Urszula Religioni & Dariusz Świetlik & Katarzyna Plagens-Rotman & Jameason D. Cameron & Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska & Katarina Fehir Šola & Justyna Kazm, 2022. "Patient Perceptions on Receiving Vaccination Services through Community Pharmacies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-8, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2538-:d:755819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2538/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2538/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska & Michal Chojnicki & Lukasz M. Karbowski & Salwan R. Al-Saad & Abbas A. Hashmi & Jerzy Chudek & Slawomir Tobis & Sylwia Kropinska & Iwona Mozer-Lisewska & Aleksandra Suwals, 2020. "Clinical Characteristics and Survival Analysis in a Small Sample of Older COVID-19 Patients with Defined 60-Day Outcome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Marcin Czech & Marcin Balcerzak & Adam Antczak & Michał Byliniak & Elżbieta Piotrowska-Rutkowska & Mariola Drozd & Grzegorz Juszczyk & Urszula Religioni & Regis Vaillancourt & Piotr Merks, 2020. "Flu Vaccinations in Pharmacies—A Review of Pharmacists Fighting Pandemics and Infectious Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Jamie Murphy & Frédérique Vallières & Richard P. Bentall & Mark Shevlin & Orla McBride & Todd K. Hartman & Ryan McKay & Kate Bennett & Liam Mason & Jilly Gibson-Miller & Liat Levita & Anton P. Martine, 2021. "Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Piotr Merks & Urszula Religioni & Krzysztof Bilmin & Jedrzej Lewicki & Marta Jakubowska & Anna Waksmundzka-Walczuk & Aleksandra Czerw & Agnieszka Barańska & Joanna Bogusz & Katarzyna Plagens-Rotman & , 2021. "Readiness and Willingness to Provide Immunization Services after Pilot Vaccination Training: A Survey among Community Pharmacists Trained and Not Trained in Immunization during the COVID-19 Pandemic i," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Marcin Wiśniewski & Urszula Religioni & Piotr Merks, 2020. "Community Pharmacies in Poland—The Journey from a Deregulated to a Strictly Regulated Market," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-11, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maja Andrzejewska & Urszula Religioni & Paweł Piątkiewicz & Agnieszka Barańska & Jolanta Herda & Aleksandra Czerw & Jerzy Krysiński & Piotr Merks, 2022. "Public Perception of Pharmacists in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Giulietti, Corrado & Vlassopoulos, Michael & Zenou, Yves, 2021. "When Reality Bites: Local Deaths and Vaccine Take-Up," GLO Discussion Paper Series 999, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    3. Louise Rawlings & Jeffrey C. L. Looi & Stephen J. Robson, 2022. "Economic Considerations in COVID‐19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Refusal: A Survey of the Literature," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 98(321), pages 214-229, June.
    4. Tuomo Hartonen & Bradley Jermy & Hanna Sõnajalg & Pekka Vartiainen & Kristi Krebs & Andrius Vabalas & Tuija Leino & Hanna Nohynek & Jonas Sivelä & Reedik Mägi & Mark Daly & Hanna M. Ollila & Lili Mila, 2023. "Nationwide health, socio-economic and genetic predictors of COVID-19 vaccination status in Finland," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(7), pages 1069-1083, July.
    5. Sou Hyun Jang, 2022. "Social-ecological factors related to preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Albanese, Andrea & Fallucchi, Francesco & Verheyden, Bertrand, 2021. "Can a supranational medicines agency restore trust after vaccine suspensions? The case of Vaxzevria," GLO Discussion Paper Series 878, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    7. Raluca Buturoiu & Georgiana Udrea & Denisa-Adriana Oprea & Nicoleta Corbu, 2021. "Who Believes in Conspiracy Theories about the COVID-19 Pandemic in Romania? An Analysis of Conspiracy Theories Believers’ Profiles," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Hill, Patrick L. & Burrow, Anthony L. & Strecher, Victor J., 2021. "Sense of purpose in life predicts greater willingness for COVID-19 vaccination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    9. Kejriwal, Saransh & Sheth, Sarjan & Silpa, P.S. & Sarkar, Sumit & Guha, Apratim, 2022. "Attaining herd immunity to a new infectious disease through multi-stage policies incentivising voluntary vaccination," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Estera Twardowska-Staszek & Irmina Rostek & Krzysztof Biel, 2022. "Sociodemographic and Psychological Variables and Concerns Related to COVID-19 Vaccination among Polish Citizens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-13, August.
    11. Daphne Bussink-Voorend & Jeannine L. A. Hautvast & Lisa Vandeberg & Olga Visser & Marlies E. J. L. Hulscher, 2022. "A systematic literature review to clarify the concept of vaccine hesitancy," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(12), pages 1634-1648, December.
    12. Sirola, Anu & Nuckols, Julia & Nyrhinen, Jussi & Wilska, Terhi-Anna, 2022. "The use of the Dark Web as a COVID-19 information source: A three-country study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    13. Eiji Yamamura & Yoshiro Tsutsui & Fumio Ohtake, 2023. "Would Monetary Incentives to COVID-19 vaccination reduce motivation?," Papers 2311.11828, arXiv.org.
    14. Piotr Merks & Urszula Religioni & Magdalena Waszyk-Nowaczyk & Justyna Kaźmierczak & Artur Białoszewski & Eliza Blicharska & Anna Kowalczuk & Agnieszka Neumann-Podczaska, 2022. "Assessment of Pharmacists’ Willingness to Conduct Medication Use Reviews in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-8, February.
    15. Kai Yang & Raymond Y. K. Lau & Ahmed Abbasi, 2023. "Getting Personal: A Deep Learning Artifact for Text-Based Measurement of Personality," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 194-222, March.
    16. Jinzi Zhang & Pu Ge & Xialei Li & Mei Yin & Yujia Wang & Waikit Ming & Jinhui Li & Pei Li & Xinying Sun & Yibo Wu, 2022. "Personality Effects on Chinese Public Preference for the COVID-19 Vaccination: Discrete Choice Experiment and Latent Profile Analysis Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    17. Griffin, Bethany & Conner, Mark & Norman, Paul, 2022. "Applying an extended protection motivation theory to predict Covid-19 vaccination intentions and uptake in 50–64 year olds in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    18. Kozica, Daria & Wild, Frank, 2022. "Wer ist impfberechtigt? Ein internationaler Blick," WIP-Kurzanalysen Mai 2022, WIP – Wissenschaftliches Institut der PKV, Köln.
    19. Sahil Loomba & Alexandre Figueiredo & Simon J. Piatek & Kristen Graaf & Heidi J. Larson, 2021. "Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 337-348, March.
    20. Josh Bullock & Justin E. Lane & F. LeRon Shults, 2022. "What causes COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy? Ignorance and the lack of bliss in the United Kingdom," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2538-:d:755819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.