IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i4p2019-d747009.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Primary School Curriculums in 11 Countries around the World Deliver Food Education and Address Food Literacy: A Policy Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kim Smith

    (Centre for Food Policy, City, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK)

  • Rebecca Wells

    (Centre for Food Policy, City, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK)

  • Corinna Hawkes

    (Centre for Food Policy, City, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK)

Abstract

(1) Background: As one of the biggest drivers of health and climate change, the food system has unrealised potential to influence consumption toward affordable, healthy, sustainable diets. A range of policy levers, including mandating food education, are needed. Schools are considered the best place for food education and childhood is a crucial period when eating habits that persist into adulthood are formed. Food education as part of the curriculum is crucial in generating population shifts in food systems improvements. The purpose of this policy analysis was to analyse mandatory curriculums in different countries to explore the ways in which primary school food education addresses food literacy. (2) Methods: This study analyses how food education within primary school education policy, in 11 countries, addresses Food Literacy (FL). It is the first study of this kind. A case study methodology was employed, and curriculum policy content analysis was conducted using a Food Literacy framework. (3) Results: Each country has a curriculum dedicated to food education, supported by food education in non-food curriculums. There is no standardized approach to primary school food education policy, no consensus in primary food education nomenclature or what curriculums constitute. Curriculums focus on cooking and health topics, but significantly less on social-cultural, equity, and sustainability issues. (4) Conclusion: How primary curriculums around the world deliver food education policy to address FL varies enormously. All 11 countries have dedicated food curriculums, supported by non-food curriculums, but there is no consensus as to what food education is called or constitutes. Countries rarely deal with FL comprehensively. The most comprehensive are single, detailed food curriculums, complemented by non-food curriculums where food knowledge and skills progress clearly and are the intended learning outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim Smith & Rebecca Wells & Corinna Hawkes, 2022. "How Primary School Curriculums in 11 Countries around the World Deliver Food Education and Address Food Literacy: A Policy Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2019-:d:747009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2019/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/4/2019/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Donna Fingland & Courtney Thompson & Helen Anna Vidgen, 2021. "Measuring Food Literacy: Progressing the Development of an International Food Literacy Survey Using a Content Validity Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristy Howells & Tara Coppinger, 2022. "The Forgotten Age Phase of Healthy Lifestyle Promotion? A Preliminary Study to Examine the Potential Call for Targeted Physical Activity and Nutrition Education for Older Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hala Mohsen & Yonna Sacre & Lara Hanna-Wakim & Maha Hoteit, 2022. "Nutrition and Food Literacy in the MENA Region: A Review to Inform Nutrition Research and Policy Makers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Ellen Paynter & Andrea Begley & Lucy M. Butcher & Satvinder S. Dhaliwal, 2021. "The Validation and Improvement of a Food Literacy Behavior Checklist for Food Literacy Programs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:4:p:2019-:d:747009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.