IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1197-d730480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens

Author

Listed:
  • Thi Tham Nguyen

    (School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia)

  • Graham R. Johnson

    (School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia)

  • Scott C. Bell

    (Children’s Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia
    Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD 4032, Australia
    Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia)

  • Luke D. Knibbs

    (School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
    Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia)

Abstract

Interrupting the transmission of airborne (<≈5 µm) respiratory pathogens indoors is not a new challenge, but it has attracted unprecedented interest due to the COVID-19 pandemic during 2020–2021. However, bacterial respiratory pathogens with known or potential airborne transmission account for an appreciable proportion of the communicable disease burden globally. We aimed to systematically review quantitative, laboratory-based studies of air disinfection techniques for airborne respiratory bacteria. Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched, following PRISMA guidelines. A total of 9596 articles were identified, of which 517 were assessed in detail and of which 26 met the inclusion and quality assessment criteria. Seven air disinfection techniques, including UV-C light, filtration, and face masks, among others, were applied to 13 different bacterial pathogens. More than 80% of studies suggested that air disinfection techniques were more effective at inactivating or killing bacteria than the comparator or baseline condition. However, it was not possible to compare these techniques because of methodological heterogeneity and the relatively small number of the studies. Laboratory studies are useful for demonstrating proof-of-concept and performance under controlled conditions. However, the generalisability of their findings to person-to-person transmission in real-world settings is unclear for most of the pathogens and techniques we assessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Thi Tham Nguyen & Graham R. Johnson & Scott C. Bell & Luke D. Knibbs, 2022. "A Systematic Literature Review of Indoor Air Disinfection Techniques for Airborne Bacterial Respiratory Pathogens," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1197-:d:730480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1197/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1197/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thi Tham Nguyen & Congrong He & Robyn Carter & Emma L. Ballard & Kim Smith & Robert Groth & Esa Jaatinen & Timothy J. Kidd & Thuy-Khanh Nguyen & Rebecca E. Stockwell & George Tay & Graham R. Johnson &, 2022. "The Effectiveness of Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) Irradiation on the Viability of Airborne Pseudomonas aeruginosa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Hashim Alhussain & Saud Ghani & Nahla O. Eltai, 2024. "Breathing Clean Air: Navigating Indoor Air Purification Techniques and Finding the Ideal Solution," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(8), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Linghui Peng & Haiyu Wang & Guiying Li & Zhishu Liang & Weiping Zhang & Weina Zhao & Taicheng An, 2023. "Bioinspired artificial spider silk photocatalyst for the high-efficiency capture and inactivation of bacteria aerosols," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1197-:d:730480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.