IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i3p1115-d728908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Response to Noise from Hot-Spots at a Major Road in Quito (Ecuador) and Its Application for Identification and Ranking These Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Virginia Puyana-Romero

    (Grupo de Investigación Entornos Acústicos, Departamento de Ingeniería en Sonido y Acústica, Campus Granados, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170125, Ecuador)

  • Jose Luis Cueto

    (Laboratorio de Ingeniería Acústica, Campus de Puerto Real, Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain)

  • Giuseppe Ciaburro

    (Dipartimento di Architettura e Disegno Industriale, Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Borgo San Lorenzo, 81031 Aversa, Italy)

  • Luis Bravo-Moncayo

    (Grupo de Investigación Entornos Acústicos, Departamento de Ingeniería en Sonido y Acústica, Campus Granados, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito 170125, Ecuador)

  • Ricardo Hernandez-Molina

    (Laboratorio de Ingeniería Acústica, Campus de Puerto Real, Universidad de Cádiz, 11510 Puerto Real, Spain)

Abstract

Environmental legislation in Ecuador is advancing with the legitimate aspiration of providing citizens with new standards of quality and environmental health. In the context of environmental noise, these legislative advances are based on the experience accumulated in other countries, which is an advantage that must be managed with caution by incorporating local factors into noise management procedures. This study advances two lines of work. The first is to survey the population about their attitude towards noise from a major road to try to detect local factors in the annoyance and sleep disturbances. The second uses this information to compare noise indicators for the detection and ranking of hot-spots from major roads. The interviewees exhibited a high level of annoyance and sleep disturbance due to noise compared with the results of other studies. Results show that there are small differences in the definition of hot-spots when using WHO’s dose–response curves for L den ≥ 68 dB for and for L night ≥ 58 dB, in comparison with the curves generated in this study (CS). Regarding the application of both dose–response curves (WHO vs. CS) to the estimation of the population at risk of the harmful effect of nighttime traffic noise (HSD), small oscillations are also observed even when L night ≥ 58 dB and L noche ≥ 60 dB are used.

Suggested Citation

  • Virginia Puyana-Romero & Jose Luis Cueto & Giuseppe Ciaburro & Luis Bravo-Moncayo & Ricardo Hernandez-Molina, 2022. "Community Response to Noise from Hot-Spots at a Major Road in Quito (Ecuador) and Its Application for Identification and Ranking These Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1115-:d:728908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/3/1115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frits Van den Berg & Claudia Verhagen & Daan Uitenbroek, 2014. "The Relation between Scores on Noise Annoyance and Noise Disturbed Sleep in a Public Health Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Rainer Guski & Dirk Schreckenberg & Rudolf Schuemer, 2017. "WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Annoyance," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-39, December.
    3. Peter Lercher & Bert De Coensel & Luc Dekonink & Dick Botteldooren, 2017. "Community Response to Multiple Sound Sources: Integrating Acoustic and Contextual Approaches in the Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-34, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Virginia Puyana-Romero & Angela María Díaz-Márquez & Giuseppe Ciaburro & Ricardo Hernández-Molina, 2022. "The Acoustic Environment and University Students’ Satisfaction with the Online Education Method during the COVID-19 Lockdown," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-27, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irene van Kamp & Frits van den Berg, 2021. "Health Effects Related to Wind Turbine Sound: An Update," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Truls Gjestland, 2020. "On the Temporal Stability of People’s Annoyance with Road Traffic Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Leon Müller & Jens Forssén & Wolfgang Kropp, 2023. "Traffic Noise at Moderate Levels Affects Cognitive Performance: Do Distance-Induced Temporal Changes Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Tran Thi Hong Nhung Nguyen & Bach Lien Trieu & Thu Lan Nguyen & Makoto Morinaga & Yasuhiro Hiraguri & Takashi Morihara & Yosiaki Sasazawa & Tri Quang Hung Nguyen & Takashi Yano, 2023. "Models of Aviation Noise Impact in the Context of Operation Decrease at Tan Son Nhat Airport," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(8), pages 1-28, April.
    5. Owen Douglas & Enda Murphy, 2020. "Assessing the Treatment of Potential Effect Modifiers Informing World Health Organisation Guidelines for Environmental Noise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Davide Petri & Gaetano Licitra & Maria Angela Vigotti & Luca Fredianelli, 2021. "Effects of Exposure to Road, Railway, Airport and Recreational Noise on Blood Pressure and Hypertension," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Angel M. Dzhambov & Peter Lercher & Drozdstoy Stoyanov & Nadezhda Petrova & Stoyan Novakov & Donka D. Dimitrova, 2021. "University Students’ Self-Rated Health in Relation to Perceived Acoustic Environment during the COVID-19 Home Quarantine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    8. Elisa Bustaffa & Olivia Curzio & Gabriele Donzelli & Francesca Gorini & Nunzia Linzalone & Marco Redini & Fabrizio Bianchi & Fabrizio Minichilli, 2022. "Risk Associations between Vehicular Traffic Noise Exposure and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Residential Retrospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Hener, Timo, 2022. "Noise pollution and violent crime☆," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Haibo Wang & Zhipeng Wu & Xiaolin Yan & Jincai Chen, 2023. "Impact Evaluation of Network Structure Differentiation on Traffic Noise during Road Network Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    11. Meng Ma & Wenqian Ran & Jinping Wu & Minghang Li & Xiangyu Qu, 2022. "Evaluating the Impact of Metro Interior Noise on Passenger Annoyance: An Experimental Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Makoto Morinaga & Thu Lan Nguyen & Shigenori Yokoshima & Koji Shimoyama & Takashi Morihara & Takashi Yano, 2021. "The Effect of an Alternative Definition of “Percent Highly Annoyed” on the Exposure–Response Relationship: Comparison of Noise Annoyance Responses Measured by ICBEN 5-Point Verbal and 11-Point Numeric," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Sarah Weidenfeld & Sandra Sanok & Rolf Fimmers & Marie-Therese Puth & Daniel Aeschbach & Eva-Maria Elmenhorst, 2021. "Short-Term Annoyance Due to Night-Time Road, Railway, and Air Traffic Noise: Role of the Noise Source, the Acoustical Metric, and Non-Acoustical Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Mark Brink & Lise Giorgis-Allemand & Dirk Schreckenberg & Anne-Sophie Evrard, 2021. "Pooling and Comparing Noise Annoyance Scores and “High Annoyance” (HA) Responses on the 5-Point and 11-Point Scales: Principles and Practical Advice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-13, July.
    15. Dominik Hauptvogel & Dirk Schreckenberg & Tobias Rothmund & Marie-Therese Schmitz & Susanne Bartels, 2023. "Being a Fair Neighbor—Towards a Psychometric Inventory to Assess Fairness-Related Perceptions of Airports by Residents—Development and Validation of the Aircraft Noise-Related Fairness Inventory (fAIR," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Angel M. Dzhambov & Peter Lercher, 2019. "Road Traffic Noise Exposure and Birth Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-20, July.
    17. Tommy Langen & Vimala Nunavath & Ole Henrik Dahle, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework Proposal for a Noise Modelling Service for Drones in U-Space Architecture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-20, December.
    18. Rainer Guski & Dirk Schreckenberg & Rudolf Schuemer & Mark Brink & Stephen A. Stansfeld, 2019. "Comment on Gjestland, T. A Systematic Review of the Basis for WHO’s New Recommendation for Limiting Aircraft Noise Annoyance. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. Health 2018, 15 , 2717," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-6, March.
    19. Clémence Baudin & Marie Lefèvre & Patricia Champelovier & Jacques Lambert & Bernard Laumon & Anne-Sophie Evrard, 2018. "Aircraft Noise and Psychological Ill-Health: The Results of a Cross-Sectional Study in France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, August.
    20. Charlotte Clark & Clare Crumpler & Hilary Notley, 2020. "Evidence for Environmental Noise Effects on Health for the United Kingdom Policy Context: A Systematic Review of the Effects of Environmental Noise on Mental Health, Wellbeing, Quality of Life, Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-34, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:3:p:1115-:d:728908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.