IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p696-d720391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Job Insecurity and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Fang Sun

    (Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Anqi Zheng

    (School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Junbang Lan

    (School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China)

Abstract

Given the rapid changes in current technologies, business models, and work environments, organizations and managers increasingly rely on their employees’ proactive behaviors, such as taking charge, to gain competitive advantages. Taking charge involves a range of risky and future-oriented behaviors, and it requires employees to work hard to achieve them in the future. For employees with high job-insecurity, their job continuity in the future is threatened. Thus, they may not be willing to take risks to do additional work that is “future-oriented”. To our knowledge, the effect of job insecurity on employees’ taking charge has rarely been studied. As a result, the purpose of our study is to investigate whether, how, and when job insecurity will influence taking charge. Drawing on the conservation of resources theory and proactive motivation model, we develop a theoretical model. Moreover, we employed a multi-wave and multi-source survey to test our predictions. Based on the data from 194 full-time employees paired with their direct supervisors, the results provided consistent support for the proposed hypotheses. Specifically, the results indicate that job insecurity prohibits employees’ taking charge behaviors through deteriorating their work engagement. Furthermore, employees’ perception of interactional justice moderates the negative influence of job insecurity on their work engagement and, consequently, their taking charge behaviors. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Fang Sun & Anqi Zheng & Junbang Lan, 2022. "Job Insecurity and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors: Testing a Moderated Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:696-:d:720391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/696/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/696/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenqing Tian & Huatian Wang & Sonja Rispens, 2021. "How and When Job Crafting Relates to Employee Creativity: The Important Roles of Work Engagement and Perceived Work Group Status Diversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Shao-Long Li & Wei He & Kai Yam & Li-Rong Long, 2015. "When and why empowering leadership increases followers’ taking charge: A multilevel examination in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 645-670, September.
    3. Subhendu Patnaik & Uma Sankar Mishra & Bibhuti Bhusan Mishra, 2022. "Can psychological capital reduce stress and job insecurity? An experimental examination with indian evidence," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 1071-1096, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shao-Long Li & Fang Sun & Mingze Li, 2019. "Sustainable Human Resource Management Nurtures Change-Oriented Employees: Relationship between High-Commitment Work Systems and Employees’ Taking Charge Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Qi Zhang & Boxuan Shi & Yuchao Liu & Zhou Liang & Liangqun Qi, 2024. "The impact of educational digitalization on the creativity of students with special needs: the role of study crafting and creative self-efficacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Haeyoung Koo & Choelsoon Park, 2018. "Foundation of leadership in Asia: Leader characteristics and leadership styles review and research agenda," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 697-718, September.
    4. Long W. Lam & Aichia Chuang & Chi-Sum Wong & Julie N. Y. Zhu, 2019. "A typology of three-way interaction models: Applications and suggestions for Asian management research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 1-16, March.
    5. Kai Chi Yam & Scott J. Reynolds & Pengcheng Zhang & Runkun Su, 2022. "The Unintended Consequences of Empowering Leadership: Increased Deviance for Some Followers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 683-700, December.
    6. Zhu, Yue & Wang, Jie & Chen, Tingting & Crant, Michael J. & Yang, Xiaoling & Li, Chang & Wang, Yongyue, 2024. "Can high performers take charge? The effects of role breadth self-efficacy and hostile interpersonal environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Usman Ghani & Muhammad Tahir Masood & Zia Ur Rehman, 2018. "Empowered Leadership and Employee Outcomes: Mediating Role of Employee Engagement," Global Social Sciences Review, Humanity Only, vol. 3(2), pages 303-320, June.
    8. Zhou, Xing & Ma, Jianfeng & Dong, Xia, 2018. "Empowering supervision and service sabotage: A moderated mediation model based on conservation of resources theory," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 170-187.
    9. Xiaowan Lin & Long W. Lam & Lida L. Zhang, 2020. "The curvilinear relationship between job satisfaction and employee voice: Speaking up for the organization and the self," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 587-607, June.
    10. Dirk De Clercq & Tasneem Fatima & Sadia Jahanzeb, 2021. "Ingratiating with Despotic Leaders to Gain Status: The Role of Power Distance Orientation and Self-enhancement Motive," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(1), pages 157-174, June.
    11. Kihyun Lee & Yeon Joo Chae & Inyong Shin, 2016. "Motivational antecedents of leader-member exchange differentiation: Evidence from South Korea," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 87-112, March.
    12. Jose M. León-Pérez & Mindy K. Shoss & Aristides I. Ferreira & Gabriele Giorgi, 2021. "Emerging Issues in Occupational Health Psychology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-4, November.
    13. Shao-Long Li & Yuanyuan Huo & Li-Rong Long, 2017. "Chinese Traditionality Matters: Effects of Differentiated Empowering Leadership on Followers’ Trust in Leaders and Work Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 81-93, September.
    14. Michelle She Min Ngo & Michael J. Mustafa & Muhammad Mohsin Butt, 2023. "When and why employees take charge in the Workplace: the roles of learning goal orientation, role-breadth self-efficacy and co-worker support," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1681-1702, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:696-:d:720391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.