IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i2p625-d718785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of People over 65 Years of Age

Author

Listed:
  • Marlena Krawczyk-Suszek

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Medical College, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, 35-225 Rzeszow, Poland)

  • Andrzej Kleinrok

    (Department of Physiotherapy, Medical College, University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow, 35-225 Rzeszow, Poland)

Abstract

Quality of life is an important indicator of the treatment process, lifestyle, and influence of many other factors, both exogenous and endogenous, on the body. Determining the quality of life of healthy people (health-related quality of life (HRQoL), considering the influence of various factors, is important due to the possibility of making subsequent comparative analyses regarding the quality of life of people diagnosed with diseases. In addition, it allows us to identify the most crucial factors influencing the HRQoL in the process of “good aging”. The purpose of the study was to present the HRQoL level of healthy people over 65 years of age. HRQoL was measured in five-year age groups (66–70, 71–75, 76–80, >80 years), considering the analyzed factors. Finally, 1038 healthy people were included in the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: no diagnosed chronic diseases, no permanent treatment in specialist clinics, and no constant administration of medicaments. A comparative analysis was carried out, assuming a 5% conclusion error. The SF-36 questionnaire assessing the main dimensions of the quality of life was the tool used in the study to assess the HRQoL: the physical component summary (PCS), mental component summary (MCS) and index of life quality (ILQ). The factors significantly differentiating the average level of HRQoL were as follows: gender, place of residence, education, employment status, smoking and physical activity. Relationship status ( p > 0.05) was one of the analyzed factors that did not influence the differences in the average level of the perceived HRQoL. More than a twofold greater chance of a higher HRQoL was reported in the group of men under 75 years of age (66–70: OR = 2.01; 71–75: OR = 2.52) compared to the group of women. The same relationship was noted in the case of higher education in respondents up to the age of 80 (66–70: OR = 1.56; 71–75: OR = 2.16; 76–80: OR = 2.74). Smoking by people over 80 years of age significantly increased the chances of a higher HRQoL in each of the dimensions (PCS: OR = 4.09; MCS: OR = 12.64; ILQ: OR = 5.79). Age as a non-modifiable factor significantly differentiates the level of the HRQoL of healthy people over 65 years of age. The results of the conducted study on HRQoL can be helpful when comparing the HRQoL of healthy people with a group of people with chronic diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • Marlena Krawczyk-Suszek & Andrzej Kleinrok, 2022. "Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of People over 65 Years of Age," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-24, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:625-:d:718785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/625/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/2/625/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Becca R. Levy & Martin D. Slade & Stanislav V. Kasl, 2002. "Longitudinal Benefit of Positive Self-Perceptions of Aging on Functional Health," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 57(5), pages 409-417.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Margherita Napolitani & Giovanni Guarducci & Gulnara Abinova & Gabriele Messina & Nicola Nante, 2022. "How to Improve the Drafting of Health Profiles," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Frida Sara Rivera-Ochoa & Ixel Venecia González-Herrera & Mariano Zacarías-Flores & Elsa Correa-Muñoz & Víctor Manuel Mendoza-Núñez & Martha A. Sánchez-Rodríguez, 2022. "Relationship between Self-Perception of Aging and Quality of Life in the Different Stages of Reproductive Aging in Mexican Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Klaudia Przybysz & Agnieszka Stanimir, 2023. "How Active Are European Seniors—Their Personal Ways to Active Ageing? Is Seniors’ Activity in Line with the Expectations of the Active Ageing Strategy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bach Q. Ho & Kunio Shirahada, 2022. "Older People’s Knowledge Creation Motivations for Sustainable Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Sophie Haesen & Tenzin Wangmo & Bernice S. Elger, 2018. "Identity as an older prisoner: findings from a qualitative study in Switzerland," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 199-210, June.
    3. Emma Nilsson & Helena Igelström & Irene Vikman & Agneta Larsson & Mascha Pauelsen, 2021. "Positive Self-Perceptions of Aging Play a Significant Role in Predicting Physical Performance among Community-Dwelling Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-10, October.
    4. Ahra Oh & Jiyoun Kim & Eunsurk Yi & Jongseob Shin, 2020. "Verification of the Mediating Effect of Social Support on Physical Activity and Aging Anxiety of Korean Pre-Older Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Lotte P. Brinkhof & Sanne de Wit & Jaap M. J. Murre & Harm J. Krugers & K. Richard Ridderinkhof, 2022. "The Subjective Experience of Ageism: The Perceived Ageism Questionnaire (PAQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-21, July.
    6. Tomáš Doseděl & Tereza Menšíková & Lucie Vidovićová, 2020. "Scaling Down the PGCM Scale to Assess Views on Ageing More Efficiently: Finding a New Alternative," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Macé, Serge & Le Lec, Fabrice, 2011. "On fatalistic long-term health behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 434-439, June.
    8. Qingxiu Dang & Baoshan Zhang, 2022. "Linkage from Self-Sacrifice to Hope Through the Intervening Roles of Perceived Family Support and Attitudes to Aging in Chinese Older Adults," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 2405-2426, August.
    9. Julia K. Wolff & Benjamin Schüz & Jochen P. Ziegelmann & Lisa M. Warner & Susanne Wurm, 2017. "Short-Term Buffers, but Long-Term Suffers? Differential Effects of Negative Self-Perceptions of Aging Following Serious Health Events," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(3), pages 408-414.
    10. Courtin, Emilie & Avendano, Mauricio, 2016. "Under one roof: The effect of co-residing with adult children on depression in later life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 140-149.
    11. Chien-Yao Sun & Chun-Yin Yeh & Yan Zhao & Ching-Ju Chiu, 2020. "Can Individual Attitudes toward Aging Predict Subsequent Physical Disabilities in Older Taiwanese Individuals? A Four-Year Retrospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Lena Spangenberg & Markus Zenger & Heide Glaesmer & Elmar Brähler & Bernhard Strauss, 2018. "Assessing age stereotypes in the German population in 1996 and 2011: socio-demographic correlates and shift over time," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 47-56, March.
    13. Deirdre A Robertson & George M Savva & Bellinda L King-Kallimanis & Rose Anne Kenny, 2015. "Negative Perceptions of Aging and Decline in Walking Speed: A Self-Fulfilling Prophecy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Zhifei He & Zhaohui Cheng & Tian Shao & Chunyan Liu & Piaopiao Shao & Ghose Bishwajit & Da Feng & Zhanchun Feng, 2016. "Factors Influencing Health Knowledge and Behaviors among the Elderly in Rural China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, September.
    15. Angie Hartnett & Catherine Gorman, 2022. "Active Leisure and Ageing in Rural Ireland: Exploring Perceptions and Motivations to Facilitate and Promote Meaningful Physical Activity," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 15(1), pages 65-80.
    16. E-Shien Chang & Sneha Kannoth & Samantha Levy & Shi-Yi Wang & John E Lee & Becca R Levy, 2020. "Global reach of ageism on older persons’ health: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, January.
    17. Margie E Lachman & Stefan Agrigoroaei, 2010. "Promoting Functional Health in Midlife and Old Age: Long-Term Protective Effects of Control Beliefs, Social Support, and Physical Exercise," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-9, October.
    18. Wang, Kun & Gu, Danan, 2023. "Reciprocal associations between social media use and self-perception of aging among older adults: Do men and women differ?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    19. Bailis, Daniel S. & Chipperfield, Judith G. & Helgason, Tiffany R., 2008. "Collective self-esteem and the onset of chronic conditions and reduced activity in a longitudinal study of aging," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 1817-1827, April.
    20. Anna E Kornadt & Jelena S Siebert & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2019. "The interplay of personality and attitudes toward own aging across two decades of later life," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:2:p:625-:d:718785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.