IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i24p16986-d1006771.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Call for Action on Chronic Respiratory Diseases within Physical Activity Policies, Guidelines and Action Plans: Let’s Move!

Author

Listed:
  • Mark W. Orme

    (Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
    Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre-Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK)

  • Akila R. Jayamaha

    (Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
    Department of Research and Development, Faculty of Nursing, KAATSU International University, Battaramulla 10120, Sri Lanka)

  • Lais Santin

    (Laboratory of Research in Respiratory Physiotherapy, Health Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, Brazil)

  • Sally J. Singh

    (Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
    Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre-Respiratory, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK)

  • Fabio Pitta

    (Laboratory of Research in Respiratory Physiotherapy, Health Sciences Center, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, Brazil)

Abstract

Global policy documents for the promotion of physical activity (PA) play an important role in the measurement, evaluation, and monitoring of population PA levels. The World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines include, for the first time, recommendations for specific populations, including individuals living with a range of non-communicable diseases. Of note, is the absence of any chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) within the recommendations. Globally, CRDs are highly prevalent, are attributable to significant individual and societal burdens, and are characterised by low PA. As a community, there is a need to come together to understand how to increase CRD representation within global PA policy documents, including where the evidence gaps are and how we can align with PA research in other contexts. In this commentary, the potential for synergy between evidence into the relationships between PA in CRDs globally and the relevance to current policies, guidelines and action plans on population levels of PA are discussed. Furthermore, actions and considerations for future research, including the need to harmonize and promote PA assessment (particularly in low- and middle-income countries) and encompass the synergistic influences of PA, sedentary behaviour and sleep on health outcomes in CRD populations are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark W. Orme & Akila R. Jayamaha & Lais Santin & Sally J. Singh & Fabio Pitta, 2022. "A Call for Action on Chronic Respiratory Diseases within Physical Activity Policies, Guidelines and Action Plans: Let’s Move!," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-11, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16986-:d:1006771
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16986/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/24/16986/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew P. Kingsnorth & Alex V. Rowlands & Benjamin D. Maylor & Lauren B. Sherar & Michael C. Steiner & Mike D. Morgan & Sally J. Singh & Dale W. Esliger & Mark W. Orme, 2022. "A More Intense Examination of the Intensity of Physical Activity in People Living with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Insights from Threshold-Free Markers of Activity Intensity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Luiza Isnardi Cardoso Ricardo & Andrea Wendt & Leony Morgana Galliano & Werner de Andrade Muller & Gloria Izabel Niño Cruz & Fernando Wehrmeister & Soren Brage & Ulf Ekelund & Inácio Crochemore M. Sil, 2020. "Number of days required to estimate physical activity constructs objectively measured in different age groups: Findings from three Brazilian (Pelotas) population-based birth cohorts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:24:p:16986-:d:1006771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.