Author
Listed:
- Andrew P. Kingsnorth
(Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK)
- Alex V. Rowlands
(Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK)
- Benjamin D. Maylor
(Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK)
- Lauren B. Sherar
(School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)
- Michael C. Steiner
(Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK
Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre-Respiratory, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK)
- Mike D. Morgan
(Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK
Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre-Respiratory, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK)
- Sally J. Singh
(Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK
Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre-Respiratory, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK)
- Dale W. Esliger
(School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)
- Mark W. Orme
(Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK
Centre for Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre-Respiratory, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK)
Abstract
Physical activity (PA) intensity of people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is typically evaluated using intensity thresholds developed in younger, healthier populations with greater exercise capacity and free from respiratory symptoms. This study therefore compared (i) PA differences between COPD and non-COPD controls using both traditional intensity thresholds and threshold-free metrics that represent the volume and intensity of the whole PA profile, and (ii) explored the influence of exercise capacity on observed differences. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), average acceleration (proxy for volume, mg) and intensity distribution of activity were calculated for 76 individuals with COPD and 154 non-COPD controls from wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometry. PA profiles representing the minimum intensity (acceleration, mg) during the most active accumulated 5–960 min were plotted. Estimated VO 2peak and relative intensity were derived from the incremental shuttle walk test distance. Compared to the non-COPD control group, individuals with COPD recorded fewer MVPA minutes (59 vs. 83 min/day), lower overall waking activity (29.1 vs. 36.4 mg) and a poorer waking intensity distribution (−2.73 vs. −2.57). Individuals with COPD also recorded a lower absolute intensity (acceleration, mg) for their most active 5–960 min, but higher intensity relative to their estimated exercise capacity derived from the ISWT. People with COPD have a lower volume and absolute intensity of PA than controls but perform PA at a higher relative intensity. There is a need to move away from absolute intensity thresholds, and towards personalised or relative-intensity thresholds, to reflect reduced exercise capacity in COPD populations.
Suggested Citation
Andrew P. Kingsnorth & Alex V. Rowlands & Benjamin D. Maylor & Lauren B. Sherar & Michael C. Steiner & Mike D. Morgan & Sally J. Singh & Dale W. Esliger & Mark W. Orme, 2022.
"A More Intense Examination of the Intensity of Physical Activity in People Living with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Insights from Threshold-Free Markers of Activity Intensity,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12355-:d:928019
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12355-:d:928019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.