IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v54y2017i7p1736-1759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Village-led land development under state-led institutional arrangements in urbanising China: The case of Shenzhen

Author

Listed:
  • Yani Lai

    (Shenzhen University, China)

  • Edwin Hon Wan Chan

    (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)

  • Lennon Choy

    (The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

Abstract

As a unique phenomenon of urbanisation in China, the emergence of urban villages has attracted considerable attention from the academic community. Adopting an institutional approach on land development, this study analyses how the land property rights regime affects village-led land development behaviours and spatial outcomes in urban villages. Using a set of reliable data from Shenzhen, the empirical study shows that, although unequal land rights under the current land property rights regime impose severe institutional constraints to the development of urban villages, they actually play a much more important and diversified role in China’s urbanisation than previously recognised. As the primary developers of urban villages, villagers have adopted various land development strategies in response to the changing market environment and internal economic conditions in the dynamic urbanisation process. These dynamic strategies have contributed to the coexistence of sub-optimal industrial development and high-quality housing development in urban villages.

Suggested Citation

  • Yani Lai & Edwin Hon Wan Chan & Lennon Choy, 2017. "Village-led land development under state-led institutional arrangements in urbanising China: The case of Shenzhen," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(7), pages 1736-1759, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:54:y:2017:i:7:p:1736-1759
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098016629325
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098016629325
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098016629325?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pu Hao & Stan Geertman & Pieter Hooimeijer & Richard Sliuzas, 2012. "The Land-Use Diversity in Urban Villages in Shenzhen," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2742-2764, November.
    2. Li Tian, 2008. "The Chengzhongcun Land Market in China: Boon or Bane? — A Perspective on Property Rights," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 282-304, June.
    3. Yan Song & Yves Zenou & Chengri Ding, 2008. "Let's Not Throw the Baby Out with the Bath Water: The Role of Urban Villages in Housing Rural Migrants in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(2), pages 313-330, February.
    4. Qian, Yingyi & Roland, Gerard, 1998. "Federalism and the Soft Budget Constraint," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(5), pages 1143-1162, December.
    5. Ya Ping Wang & Yanglin Wang & Jiansheng Wu, 2009. "Urbanization and Informal Development in China: Urban Villages in Shenzhen," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 957-973, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pu Hao & Pieter Hooimeijer & Richard Sliuzas & Stan Geertman, 2013. "What Drives the Spatial Development of Urban Villages in China?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(16), pages 3394-3411, December.
    2. Ye Liu & Zhigang Li & Yuqi Liu & Hongsheng Chen, 2015. "Growth of rural migrant enclaves in Guangzhou, China: Agency, everyday practice and social mobility," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(16), pages 3086-3105, December.
    3. Pan, Wenjian & Du, Juan, 2021. "Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Lin Jiang & Yani Lai & Ke Chen & Xiao Tang, 2022. "What Drives Urban Village Redevelopment in China? A Survey of Literature Based on Web of Science Core Collection Database," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. H Chung, 2018. "Rural migrants in villages-in-the-city in Guangzhou, China: Multi-positionality and negotiated living strategies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(10), pages 2245-2260, August.
    6. Pengyu Zhu, 2016. "Residential segregation and employment outcomes of rural migrant workers in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(8), pages 1635-1656, June.
    7. Dinghuan Yuan & Yung Yau & Haijun Bao & Yongshen Liu & Ting Liu, 2019. "Anatomizing the Institutional Arrangements of Urban Village Redevelopment: Case Studies in Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Fulong Wu, 2009. "Land Development, Inequality and Urban Villages in China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 885-889, December.
    9. Yue Wu & Yi Zhang, 2022. "Formal and Informal Planning-Dominated Urban Village Development: A Comparative Study of Luojiazhuang and Yangjiapailou in Hangzhou, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, April.
    10. Lin Ye, 2011. "Urban regeneration in China: Policy, development, and issues," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 26(5), pages 337-347, August.
    11. Lanchih Po, 2012. "Asymmetrical Integration: Public Finance Deprivation in China's Urbanized Villages," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(12), pages 2834-2851, December.
    12. Keying Han & Shitai Bao & Meixuan She & Qixin Pan & Yina Liu & Biao Chen, 2023. "Exploration of Intelligent Building Planning for Urban Renewal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Qing Yang & Yan Song & Yinying Cai, 2020. "Blending Bottom-Up and Top-Down Urban Village Redevelopment Modes: Comparing Multidimensional Welfare Changes of Resettled Households in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Yani Lai & Lin Jiang & Xiaoxiao Xu, 2021. "Exploring Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Urban Village Redevelopment: The Case of Shenzhen, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, September.
    15. Karita Kan, 2019. "Accumulation without Dispossession? Land Commodification and Rent Extraction in Peri‐urban China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 633-648, July.
    16. Shenjing He, 2015. "Consuming urban living in ‘villages in the city’: Studentification in Guangzhou, China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(15), pages 2849-2873, November.
    17. Tang, Peng & Feng, Yue & Li, Min & Zhang, Yanyan, 2021. "Can the performance evaluation change from central government suppress illegal land use in local governments? A new interpretation of Chinese decentralisation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Hui Fang Cong, 2012. "Urban villagesí Redevelopments in Weihai China: Physical and Social Changes," ERES eres2012_384, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    19. Yue Wu & Yi Zhang & Zexu Han & Siyuan Zhang & Xiangyi Li, 2022. "Examining the Planning Policies of Urban Villages Guided by China’s New-Type Urbanization: A Case Study of Hangzhou City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-25, December.
    20. Pu Hao & Stan Geertman & Pieter Hooimeijer & Richard Sliuzas, 2012. "The Land-Use Diversity in Urban Villages in Shenzhen," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(11), pages 2742-2764, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:54:y:2017:i:7:p:1736-1759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.