IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p16159-d991881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact Mechanism and Spillover Effect of Digital Rural Construction on the Efficiency of Green Transformation for Cultivated Land Use in China

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Tang

    (School of Public Management, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Menghan Chen

    (School of Public Management, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

Abstract

Under the context of digital economy, agricultural production will be promoted by implementing the strategy of digital rural construction and giving full play to the role of digital factor productivity. This study systematically explains the mechanism of how digital rural construction affects the efficiency of green transformation for cultivated land use. The panel data of 30 provinces in China from 2011 to 2020 are analyzed through two-way fixed effect, spatial Dubin model and other methods, so as to better understand the impact of digital rural construction on the efficiency of green transformation for cultivated land use and its spillover effect. It is discovered in the study that digital rural construction is effective in enhancing the efficiency of green transformation for regional cultivated land use, and that this promoting effect stands multiple robustness tests. According to the heterogeneity analysis, the promoting effect of digital rural construction is more significant in the eastern region and among the samples with high green transformation efficiency of cultivated land use. In addition to improving the efficiency of green transformation for cultivated land use in the region, digital rural construction can also produce a positive spatial spillover effect to a significant extent. On this basis, the targeted policy recommendations are made in this paper. The first one is to improve the efficiency of green transformation for cultivated land use by accelerating the process of digital rural construction. The second one is to pay close attention to the differences in the process of digital rural construction. The third one is to better understand the “welfare sharing” characteristics of digital rural construction. The last one is to establish a mechanism of regional cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Tang & Menghan Chen, 2022. "The Impact Mechanism and Spillover Effect of Digital Rural Construction on the Efficiency of Green Transformation for Cultivated Land Use in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16159-:d:991881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16159/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16159/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. O. P. Fadeeva & V. I. Nefedkin, 2021. "Agrarian Land Use in Russia Under Digitalization Conditions: Case Study of Altai Krai," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 387-395, July.
    2. Aker, Jenny C. & Ksoll, Christopher, 2016. "Can mobile phones improve agricultural outcomes? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Niger," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 44-51.
    3. Athanasios Balafoutis & Bert Beck & Spyros Fountas & Jurgen Vangeyte & Tamme Van der Wal & Iria Soto & Manuel Gómez-Barbero & Andrew Barnes & Vera Eory, 2017. "Precision Agriculture Technologies Positively Contributing to GHG Emissions Mitigation, Farm Productivity and Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Xiao Lu & Yi Qu & Piling Sun & Wei Yu & Wenlong Peng, 2020. "Green Transition of Cultivated Land Use in the Yellow River Basin: A Perspective of Green Utilization Efficiency Evaluation," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Johanna Pfeiffer & Andreas Gabriel & Markus Gandorfer, 2021. "Understanding the public attitudinal acceptance of digital farming technologies: a nationwide survey in Germany," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(1), pages 107-128, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hai Li & Hui Liu, 2023. "Climate Change, Farm Irrigation Facilities, and Agriculture Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Yue Zhang & Mengwei Feng & Zhengshuai Fang & Fujin Yi & Zhenzhen Liu, 2023. "Impact of Digital Village Construction on Agricultural Carbon Emissions: Evidence from Mainland China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Chengkai Zhang & Yanjun Zhang & Yu Li & Shan Li, 2023. "Coupling Coordination between Fintech and Digital Villages: Mechanism, Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors—An Empirical Study Based on China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    4. Qi Xiong & Xiaoyang Guo & Jingyi Yang, 2024. "Digital Financial Inclusion, Land Circulation and High-Quality Development of Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-25, June.
    5. Xinyu Wei & Mingwang Cheng & Kaifeng Duan & Xiangxing Kong, 2024. "Effects of Big Data on PM 2.5 : A Study Based on Double Machine Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Yue Yuan & Xiaoyang Guo & Yang Shen, 2024. "Digitalization Drives the Green Transformation of Agriculture-Related Enterprises: A Case Study of A-Share Agriculture-Related Listed Companies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, August.
    7. Haojun Xie & Quan Sun & Wei Song, 2024. "Exploring the Ecological Effects of Rural Land Use Changes: A Bibliometric Overview," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Ammoniaci & Simon-Paolo Kartsiotis & Rita Perria & Paolo Storchi, 2021. "State of the Art of Monitoring Technologies and Data Processing for Precision Viticulture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    2. Karmen Erjavec & Marjan Janžekovič & Milena Kovač & Mojca Simčič & Andrej Mergeduš & Dušan Terčič & Marija Klopčič, 2021. "Changes in Use of Communication Channels by Livestock Farmers during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Thanh‐Tung Nguyen & Trung Thanh Nguyen & Ulrike Grote, 2023. "Internet use and agricultural productivity in rural Vietnam," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1309-1326, August.
    4. Aimable Nsabimana & Patricia Funjika, 2019. "Mobile phone use, productivity and labour market in Tanzania," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2019-71, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    5. Chelanga, Philemon & Jensen, Nathaniel & Muendo, Kavoi Mutuku, 2022. "Pastoral livestock market integration amidst improvements in physical and communication infrastructure: Evidence from northern Kenya," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(4), December.
    6. Thomas M. Koutsos & Georgios C. Menexes & Andreas P. Mamolos, 2021. "The Use of Crop Yield Autocorrelation Data as a Sustainable Approach to Adjust Agronomic Inputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Luc Jacolin & Joseph Keneck Massil & Alphonse Noah, 2021. "Informal sector and mobile financial services in emerging and developing countries: Does financial innovation matter?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(9), pages 2703-2737, September.
    8. Sekabira, Haruna & Qaim, Matin, 2017. "Can mobile phones improve gender equality and nutrition? Panel data evidence from farm households in Uganda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 95-103.
    9. Wouter Zant, 2017. "Impact of Mobile Phones on Staple Food Markets in Mozambique: Improved Arbitrage or Increased Rent Extraction?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-021/V, Tinbergen Institute, revised 26 Jan 2018.
    10. Xiuli Zhang & Yikun Pei & Yong Chen & Qianglong Song & Peilin Zhou & Yueqing Xia & Xiaochan Liu, 2022. "The Design and Experiment of Vertical Variable Cavity Base Fertilizer Fertilizing Apparatus," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Vecchio, Yari & De Rosa, Marcello & Adinolfi, Felice & Bartoli, Luca & Masi, Margherita, 2020. "Adoption of precision farming tools: A context-related analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Robert B. Zougmoré & Samuel T. Partey, 2022. "Gender Perspectives of ICT Utilization in Agriculture and Climate Response in West Africa: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Hua Zhang & Qiwang Zhang & Man An & Zixuan Zhang & Nanqiao He, 2023. "Unveiling the Impact of Digital Financial Inclusion on Low-Carbon Green Utilization of Farmland: The Roles of Farmland Transfer and Management Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    14. Pomi Shahbaz & Shamsheer ul Haq & Azhar Abbas & Zahira Batool & Bader Alhafi Alotaibi & Roshan K. Nayak, 2022. "Adoption of Climate Smart Agricultural Practices through Women Involvement in Decision Making Process: Exploring the Role of Empowerment and Innovativeness," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Hong, Yan-Zhen & Chang, Hung-Hao, 2020. "Does digitalization affect the objective and subjective wellbeing of forestry farm households? Empirical evidence in Fujian Province of China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    16. Martin C. Parlasca & Oliver Mußhoff & Matin Qaim, 2020. "Can mobile phones improve nutrition among pastoral communities? Panel data evidence from Northern Kenya," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(3), pages 475-488, May.
    17. Wen Yao & Zhuo Sun, 2023. "The Impact of the Digital Economy on High-Quality Development of Agriculture: A China Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    18. Adamashvili Nino & Fiore Mariantonietta & Contò Francesco & La Sala Piermichele, 2020. "Ecosystem for Successful Agriculture. Collaborative Approach as a Driver for Agricultural Development," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 242-256, June.
    19. Xiao Lyu & Yanan Wang & Yuntai Zhao & Shandong Niu, 2022. "Spatio‐temporal pattern and mechanism of coordinated development of “population–land–industry–money” in rural areas of three provinces in Northeast China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 1333-1361, September.
    20. Margitta Minah, 2022. "What is the influence of government programs on farmer organizations and their impacts? Evidence from Zambia," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 29-53, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16159-:d:991881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.