IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15744-d985053.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception of the Neighborhood Environment, Physical Activity by Domain and Sitting Time in Brazilian Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Diego Sales

    (Centro de Estudos do Laboratório de Aptidão Física de São Caetano do Sul (CELAFISCS), São Caetano do Sul 09521-160, Brazil
    Departamento de Pediatria, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-061, Brazil)

  • Victor Matsudo

    (Centro de Estudos do Laboratório de Aptidão Física de São Caetano do Sul (CELAFISCS), São Caetano do Sul 09521-160, Brazil)

  • Mauro Fisberg

    (Departamento de Pediatria, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo 04023-061, Brazil
    Instituto Pensi, Fundação José Luiz Egydio Setubal, Hospital Infantil Sabará, São Paulo 01228-200, Brazil)

  • Clemens Drenowatz

    (Division of Sport, Physical Activity and Health, Pädagogische Hochschule Oberösterreich, 4020 Linz, Austria)

  • Adilson Marques

    (CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, 1499-002 Lisbon, Portugal
    ISAMB, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal)

  • Gerson Ferrari

    (Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Providencia 7500912, Chile)

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the association between the neighborhood environment and domain-specific physical activity and sitting time in Brazilian adults. This cross-sectional study included 1803 adults (53.7% women) from Brazil’s five regions (North, Northeast, Midwest, Southeast and South). The perception of the environment was evaluated via a questionnaire. We considered seven indicators of the neighborhood environment: land use mix-diversity, land use mix-access, street connectivity, walking/cycling facilities, aesthetics, safety from traffic and safety from crime. Using the IPAQ, we evaluated physical activity (transport and leisure) and sitting time. Overall, land use mix-diversity (β = 3.22; 95% CI = 0.26, 6.19), land use mix-access (β = 2.27; 95% CI = 0.76, 3.79), and walking/cycling facilities (β = 2.42; 95% CI = 0.35, 4.49) were positively associated with leisure-time physical activity (min/week). On the other hand, only land use mix-diversity (β = 3.65; 95% CI = 0.63, 5.49) was positively associated with transport physical activity (min/week). No neighborhood environment indicator was associated with sitting time (min/day). Perception of the neighborhood environment was associated with physical activity (transport and leisure), while no significant associations occurred with sitting time among the five regions of Brazil. The neighborhood environment can be a viable component in the promotion of physical activity, but geographic diversity must be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego Sales & Victor Matsudo & Mauro Fisberg & Clemens Drenowatz & Adilson Marques & Gerson Ferrari, 2022. "Perception of the Neighborhood Environment, Physical Activity by Domain and Sitting Time in Brazilian Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15744-:d:985053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex Antonio Florindo & Ligia Vizeu Barrozo & Gavin Turrell & João Paulo dos Anjos Souza Barbosa & William Cabral-Miranda & Chester Luiz Galvão Cesar & Moisés Goldbaum, 2018. "Cycling for Transportation in Sao Paulo City: Associations with Bike Paths, Train and Subway Stations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Lilian G. Perez & John M. Ruiz & David Berrigan, 2019. "Neighborhood Environment Perceptions among Latinos in the U.S," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Saelens, B.E. & Sallis, J.F. & Black, J.B. & Chen, D., 2003. "Neighborhood-Based Differences in Physical Activity: An Environment Scale Evaluation," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1552-1558.
    4. Priscila Bezerra Gonçalves & Pedro Curi Hallal & Adriano Akira Ferreira Hino & Rodrigo Siqueira Reis, 2017. "Individual and environmental correlates of objectively measured physical activity and sedentary time in adults from Curitiba, Brazil," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(7), pages 831-840, September.
    5. Josef Mitáš & Krzysztof Sas-Nowosielski & Dorota Groffik & Karel Frömel, 2018. "The Safety of the Neighborhood Environment and Physical Activity in Czech and Polish Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Sarah Elshahat & Michael O’Rorke & Deepti Adlakha, 2020. "Built environment correlates of physical activity in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Fernando Rubiera-Morollón & Ruben Garrido-Yserte, 2020. "Recent Literature about Urban Sprawl: A Renewed Relevance of the Phenomenon from the Perspective of Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Eduardo Quieroti Rodrigues & Leandro Martin Totaro Garcia & Evelyn Helena Corgosinho Ribeiro & Ligia Vizeu Barrozo & Regina Tomie Ivata Bernal & Douglas Roque Andrade & João Paulo dos Anjos Souza Barb, 2022. "Use of an Elevated Avenue for Leisure-Time Physical Activity by Adults from Downtown São Paulo, Brazil," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Cristina Borges Cafruni & Marcos Pascoal Pattussi & Vanessa Backes & Juvenal Dias Costa & Maria Teresa Anselmo Olinto & Fernanda Souza Bairros & Ruth Liane Henn, 2019. "Neighbourhood environment and transport-related and leisure-time sedentary behaviour amongst women in a city in Southern Brazil: a multilevel analysis," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(4), pages 511-522, May.
    10. Brownson, R.C. & Chang, J.J. & Eyler, A.A. & Ainsworth, B.E. & Kirtland, K.A. & Saelens, B.E. & Sallis, J.F., 2004. "Measuring the Environment for Friendliness Toward Physical Activity: A Comparison of the Reliability of 3 Questionnaires," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(3), pages 473-483.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Saeed Esmaeli & Kayvan Aghabayk & Nirajan Shiwakoti, 2024. "Measuring the Effect of Built Environment on Students’ School Trip Method Using Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun-Hyun Kim & Chanam Lee & Wonmin Sohn, 2016. "Urban Natural Environments, Obesity, and Health-Related Quality of Life among Hispanic Children Living in Inner-City Neighborhoods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. Alba Martínez-García & Eva María Trescastro-López & María Eugenia Galiana-Sánchez & Pamela Pereyra-Zamora, 2019. "Data Collection Instruments for Obesogenic Environments in Adults: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-27, April.
    3. Dan Andersson & Lina Wahlgren & Karin Sofia Elisabeth Olsson & Peter Schantz, 2023. "Pedestrians’ Perceptions of Motorized Traffic Variables in Relation to Appraisals of Urban Route Environments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-27, February.
    4. Dagmar Sigmundová & Walid El Ansari & Erik Sigmund, 2011. "Neighbourhood Environment Correlates of Physical Activity: A Study of Eight Czech Regional Towns," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Feyisayo A. Wayas & Joanne A. Smith & Estelle V. Lambert & Natalie Guthrie-Dixon & Yves Wasnyo & Sacha West & Tolu Oni & Louise Foley, 2023. "Association of Perceived Neighbourhood Walkability with Self-Reported Physical Activity and Body Mass Index in South African Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Foster, Sarah & Wood, Lisa & Christian, Hayley & Knuiman, Matthew & Giles-Corti, Billie, 2013. "Planning safer suburbs: Do changes in the built environment influence residents' perceptions of crime risk?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 87-94.
    7. Gerson Ferrari & André Oliveira Werneck & Danilo Rodrigues da Silva & Irina Kovalskys & Georgina Gómez & Attilio Rigotti & Lilia Yadira Cortés Sanabria & Martha Cecilia Yépez García & Rossina G. Parej, 2020. "Association between Perceived Neighborhood Built Environment and Walking and Cycling for Transport among Inhabitants from Latin America: The ELANS Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Anura Amarasinghe & Gerard D'Souza & Cheryl Brown & Tatiana Borisova, 2006. "A Spatial Analysis of Obesity in West Virginia," Working Papers Working Paper 2006-13, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    9. Spielman, Seth E. & Yoo, Eun-hye, 2009. "The spatial dimensions of neighborhood effects," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1098-1105, March.
    10. Kevin Credit & Elizabeth Mack, 2019. "Place-making and performance: The impact of walkable built environments on business performance in Phoenix and Boston," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(2), pages 264-285, February.
    11. Mi Namgung & B. Elizabeth Mercado Gonzalez & Seungwoo Park, 2019. "The Role of Built Environment on Health of Older Adults in Korea: Obesity and Gender Differences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-13, September.
    12. Courtney Coughenour & Hanns de la Fuente-Mella & Alexander Paz, 2019. "Analysis of Self-Reported Walking for Transit in a Sprawling Urban Metropolitan Area in the Western U.S," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Eric T. H. Chan & Tim Schwanen & David Banister, 2021. "The role of perceived environment, neighbourhood characteristics, and attitudes in walking behaviour: evidence from a rapidly developing city in China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 431-454, February.
    14. McNeill, Lorna Haughton & Kreuter, Matthew W. & Subramanian, S.V., 2006. "Social Environment and Physical activity: A review of concepts and evidence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 1011-1022, August.
    15. Fernando Fonseca & Escolástica Fernandes & Rui Ramos, 2022. "Walkable Cities: Using the Smart Pedestrian Net Method for Evaluating a Pedestrian Network in Guimarães, Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    16. repec:rri:wpaper:200613 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Kent, Jennifer L. & Mulley, Corinne & Stevens, Nick, 2020. "Challenging policies that prohibit public transport use: Travelling with pets as a case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 86-94.
    18. Victor O. Akande & Robert A.C. Ruiter & Stef P.J. Kremers, 2019. "Environmental and Motivational Determinants of Physical Activity among Canadian Inuit in the Arctic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Letizia Appolloni & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Daniela D’Alessandro, 2019. "The Pleasure of Walking: An Innovative Methodology to Assess Appropriate Walkable Performance in Urban Areas to Support Transport Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, June.
    20. Park, Sungjin, 2008. "Defining, Measuring, and Evaluating Path Walkability, and Testing Its Impacts on Transit Users’ Mode Choice and Walking Distance to the Station," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0ct7c30p, University of California Transportation Center.
    21. Razieh Zandieh & Javier Martinez & Johannes Flacke & Phil Jones & Martin Van Maarseveen, 2016. "Older Adults’ Outdoor Walking: Inequalities in Neighbourhood Safety, Pedestrian Infrastructure and Aesthetics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15744-:d:985053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.