IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15586-d982467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Coupling Coordination Evaluation of Mixed Land Use and Urban Vitality in Major Cities in China

Author

Listed:
  • Lijing Dong

    (School of Public Administration, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

  • Lingyu Zhang

    (School of Public Administration, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110136, China)

Abstract

Based on the data from 35 major cities in China in 2020, this paper applies the Simpson’s diversity index, the entropy value method, and the coupling coordination degree model to comprehensively measure the coupling coordination level of mixed land use and urban vitality in major cities in China and further analyze their spatial distribution characteristics. In addition, this paper analyzes the factors affecting the spatial variation of the coupling coordination level with the help of the geographic probe model. The study finds that: (1) The overall level of coupling coordination between mixed land use and urban vitality is high in 35 major cities in China. There is no disorder between mixed land use and urban vitality. (2) In terms of the spatial distribution of the coupling coordination between mixed land use and urban vitality in 35 cities in China, five cities, namely Beijing, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Chengdu, have the highest level of coupling coordination between mixed land use and urban vitality, reaching “good coordination” with a discrete spatial distribution. Central cities such as Hangzhou and Nanjing have the second highest level of coupling coordination and are at the “intermediate coordinate” with a “strip-like distribution” in space. Twenty cities in the north and south have the lowest coupling coordination levels and are in the “primary coordination.” Among these twenty cities, seven cities in the south have a higher level of coupling coordination than thirteen cities in the north, with a spatial distribution of a “C” shape. The northern cities have the lowest level of coupling coordination, with a “W”-shaped distribution in space. (3) Population size plays an essential role in guiding the level of coupling coordination between mixed land use and urban vitality in major cities in China, followed by government regulation and economic level. At the same time, transportation conditions and industrial structure have the weakest influence on the level of coupling coordination between mixed land use and urban vitality in major cities in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijing Dong & Lingyu Zhang, 2022. "Spatial Coupling Coordination Evaluation of Mixed Land Use and Urban Vitality in Major Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15586-:d:982467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15586/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15586/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. He Liu & Xueming Li, 2022. "Understanding the Driving Factors for Urban Human Settlement Vitality at Street Level: A Case Study of Dalian, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Jan Ritsema van Eck & Eric Koomen, 2008. "Characterising urban concentration and land-use diversity in simulations of future land use," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 42(1), pages 123-140, March.
    3. Hongji Chen & Kangchuan Su & Lixian Peng & Guohua Bi & Lulu Zhou & Qingyuan Yang, 2022. "Mixed Land Use Levels in Rural Settlements and Their Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Pingba Village in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Raman, Rewati & Roy, Uttam Kumar, 2019. "Taxonomy of urban mixed land use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Shaojun Liu & Ling Zhang & Yi Long, 2019. "Urban Vitality Area Identification and Pattern Analysis from the Perspective of Time and Space Fusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Jiangang Shi & Wei Miao & Hongyun Si & Ting Liu, 2021. "Urban Vitality Evaluation and Spatial Correlation Research: A Case Study from Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Manaugh, Kevin & Kreider, Tyler, 2013. "What is mixed use? Presenting an interaction method for measuring land use mix," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 6(1), pages 63-72.
    8. Qingshan Kong & Haiyang Kong & Silin Miao & Qin Zhang & Jiangang Shi, 2022. "Spatial Coupling Coordination Evaluation between Population Growth, Land Use and Housing Supply of Urban Agglomeration in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Wenze Yue & Yang Chen & Qun Zhang & Yong Liu, 2019. "Spatial Explicit Assessment of Urban Vitality Using Multi-Source Data: A Case of Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Ben Still & David Simmonds, 2000. "Parking restraint policy and urban vitality," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 291-316, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guancen Wu & Dongqin Yang & Xing Niu & Zixuan Mi, 2024. "The Impact of Park Green Space Areas on Urban Vitality: A Case Study of 35 Large and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hongji Chen & Kangchuan Su & Lixian Peng & Guohua Bi & Lulu Zhou & Qingyuan Yang, 2022. "Mixed Land Use Levels in Rural Settlements and Their Influencing Factors: A Case Study of Pingba Village in Chongqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Hongyu Zheng & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu & Cifang Wu & Jianhong Huang & Qi Fu, 2021. "Measuring and characterizing land use mix patterns of China’s megacities: A case study of Shanghai," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 2509-2539, December.
    3. He Liu & Xueming Li, 2022. "Understanding the Driving Factors for Urban Human Settlement Vitality at Street Level: A Case Study of Dalian, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Bohong Zheng & Rui Guo & Komi Bernard Bedra & Yanfen Xiang, 2022. "Quantitative Evaluation of Urban Style at Street Level: A Case Study of Hengyang County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, March.
    5. Alessia Iannillo & Isidoro Fasolino, 2021. "Land-Use Mix and Urban Sustainability: Benefits and Indicators Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Ha Na Im & Chang Gyu Choi, 2019. "The hidden side of the entropy-based land-use mix index: Clarifying the relationship between pedestrian volume and land-use mix," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(9), pages 1865-1881, July.
    7. Yishao Shi & Bo Zheng & Zhu Wang & Jianwen Zheng, 2023. "Mixed Land Use and Its Relationship with CO 2 Emissions: A Comparative Analysis Based on Several Typical Development Zones in Shanghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Yuefei Zhuo & Xin Jing & Xiaoying Wang & Guan Li & Zhongguo Xu & Yang Chen & Xueqi Wang, 2022. "The Rise and Fall of Land Use Mix: Review and Prospects," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Jiangang Shi & Wei Miao & Hongyun Si & Ting Liu, 2021. "Urban Vitality Evaluation and Spatial Correlation Research: A Case Study from Shanghai, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Motieyan, Hamid & Azmoodeh, Mohammad, 2021. "Mixed-use distribution index: A novel bilevel measure to address urban land-use mix pattern (A case study in Tehran, Iran)," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. Chen, Zhenhua & Zhou, Yulong & Haynes, Kingsley E., 2021. "Change in land use structure in urban China: Does the development of high-speed rail make a difference," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    12. Shengjun Liu & Chen Gu & Yijing Chen, 2023. "Analysis of Coupling Relation between Urban Spatial Compactness and Degree of Land Use Mix Based on Compact City Theory: The Case of Downtown Shenyang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Bridgelall, Raj & Stubbing, Edward, 2021. "Forecasting the effects of autonomous vehicles on land use," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    14. Meike Weltin & Silke Hüttel, 2023. "Sustainable Intensification Farming as an Enabler for Farm Eco-Efficiency?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 315-342, January.
    15. Paköz, Muhammed Ziya & Yaratgan, Dilara & Şahin, Aydan, 2022. "Re-mapping urban vitality through Jane Jacobs’ criteria: The case of Kayseri, Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    16. Xingjian Liu & Ying Long, 2016. "Automated identification and characterization of parcels with OpenStreetMap and points of interest," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(2), pages 341-360, March.
    17. Letizia Appolloni & Alberto Giretti & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Daniela D’Alessandro, 2020. "Walkable Urban Environments: An Ergonomic Approach of Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-31, October.
    18. Grace Abou Jaoude & Majd Murad & Olaf Mumm & Vanessa Miriam Carlow, 2024. "Operationalizing the open city concept: A case study of Berlin," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 51(3), pages 721-744, March.
    19. Jing Yang & Xinyu Zhu & Wei Chen & Yizhong Sun & Jie Zhu, 2023. "Modeling land-use change using partitioned vector cellular automata while considering urban spatial structure," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 50(8), pages 2273-2293, October.
    20. Steven R Gehrke & Kelly J Clifton, 2019. "An activity-related land use mix construct and its connection to pedestrian travel," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(1), pages 9-26, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15586-:d:982467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.