IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i22p15197-d976033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pharmaceutical Enterprises’ R&D Innovation Cooperation Moran Strategy When Considering Tax Incentives

Author

Listed:
  • Yanping Xu

    (School of Business, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
    Quality Research Center, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

  • Lilong Zhu

    (School of Business, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
    Quality Research Center, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

Drug R&D innovation contributes to the high-quality development of the pharmaceutical industry, which is related to people’s life and health, economic development, and social stability. Tax incentives and industry cooperation are conducive to promoting pharmaceutical enterprises’ innovation. Therefore, this paper constructs a Moran process evolutionary game model and analyzes the evolutionary trajectory of N pharmaceutical enterprises’ drug R&D innovation strategic choice and considers the choice of R&D innovation strategy and non-R&D innovation strategy. We obtain the conditions for the two strategies to achieve evolutionary stability under the dominance of external factors, the dominance of expected revenue, and the dominance of super expected revenue. The evolutionary process is simulated by MATLAB 2021b. The results show that, firstly, when the number of pharmaceutical enterprises is higher than a threshold, the market is conducive to pharmaceutical enterprises choosing an R&D innovation strategy. Secondly, the higher the tax incentives, the higher the probability of pharmaceutical enterprises choosing an R&D innovation strategy. Thirdly, when the R&D success rate increases, pharmaceutical enterprises gradually change from choosing a non-R&D innovation strategy to choosing an R&D innovation strategy. Fourthly, the threshold of strategy change of pharmaceutical enterprises is the same under the dominance of expected revenue and super expected revenue. This paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions for promoting the R&D innovation of pharmaceutical enterprises in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanping Xu & Lilong Zhu, 2022. "Pharmaceutical Enterprises’ R&D Innovation Cooperation Moran Strategy When Considering Tax Incentives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15197-:d:976033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15197/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/15197/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Diego R. De Moraes Silva & Luis Otávio Lucas & Nicholas S. Vonortas, 2020. "Internal barriers to innovation and university-industry cooperation among technology-based SMEs in Brazil," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 235-263, March.
    2. Dimitrios Kourouklis, 2021. "Public subsidies for R&D and public sector pharmaceutical innovation," Post-Print hal-03154800, HAL.
    3. Yu, Xinning & Lan, Yanfei & Zhao, Ruiqing, 2018. "Cooperation royalty contract design in research and development alliances: Help vs. knowledge-sharing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 740-754.
    4. Hong, Lijun & Geng, Yini & Du, Chunpeng & Shen, Chen & Shi, Lei, 2021. "Average payoff-driven or imitation? A new evidence from evolutionary game theory in finite populations," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 394(C).
    5. Mingxing Li & Mengjuan Zhang & Fredrick Oteng Agyeman & Hira Salah ud din Khan & Isabella Torcicollo, 2021. "Research on the Influence of Industry-University-Research Cooperation Innovation Network Characteristics on Subject Innovation Performance," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-13, August.
    6. Yongjian Li & Qianzhou Deng & Chi Zhou & Lipan Feng, 2020. "Environmental governance strategies in a two-echelon supply chain with tax and subsidy interactions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 439-462, July.
    7. Siyi Zhang & Lilong Zhu & Abdellatif Ben Makhlouf, 2021. "Coregulation Supervision Strategy of Drug Enterprises under the Government Reward and Punishment Mechanism," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-16, October.
    8. Gu, Cuiling & Wang, Xianjia & Zhao, Jinhua & Ding, Rui & He, Qilong, 2020. "Evolutionary game dynamics of Moran process with fuzzy payoffs and its application," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 378(C).
    9. Dimitrios Kourouklis, 2021. "Public subsidies for R&D and public sector pharmaceutical innovation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(32), pages 3759-3777, July.
    10. Izquierdo, Luis R. & Izquierdo, Segismundo S. & Sandholm, William H., 2019. "An introduction to ABED: Agent-based simulation of evolutionary game dynamics," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 434-462.
    11. Dragana Radicic & Geoffrey Pugh & David Douglas, 2020. "Promoting cooperation in innovation ecosystems: evidence from European traditional manufacturing SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 257-283, January.
    12. Junmei Rong & Lilong Zhu, 2020. "Cleaner Production Quality Regulation Strategy of Pharmaceutical with Collusive Behavior and Patient Feedback," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yang Li & Yuanzhu Wang & Rajah Rasiah, 2023. "Research on the Influence of Tax Incentives and Financing Constraints on NEEQ Enterprises’ Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gentilini, Arianna & Miraldo, Marisa, 2023. "The role of patient organisations in research and development: Evidence from rare diseases," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    2. Massimo Florio & Chiara Pancotti, 2022. "European pharmaceutical research and development. Could a public infrastructure overcome market failures?," Working Papers 202202, CSIL Centre for Industrial Studies.
    3. Wang, Moran & Li, Xuerong & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "Discovering research trends and opportunities of green finance and energy policy: A data-driven scientometric analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Sandholm, William H. & Izquierdo, Segismundo S. & Izquierdo, Luis R., 2019. "Best experienced payoff dynamics and cooperation in the Centipede game," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(4), November.
    5. Fengting Zhang & Yang Lv & Md Nazirul Islam Sarker, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Development Path of Industry–University–Research Cooperation and Economic Vulnerability: Evidence from China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    6. Natália L. Figueiredo & João J. M. Ferreira, 2022. "More than meets the partner: a systematic review and agenda for University–Industry cooperation," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 231-273, February.
    7. Tsan-Ming Choi & Tana Siqin, 2024. "Can government policies help to achieve the pollutant emissions information disclosure target in the Industry 4.0 era?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(2), pages 1129-1147, November.
    8. Dragana Radicic, 2021. "Financial and Non-Financial Barriers to Innovation and the Degree of Radicalness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Omid Ali Kharazmi & Lia Shaddel, 2024. "Evolutionary and Structural Evaluation of Innovation Ecosystems with the Aim of Mapping and Increasing Performance of Mashhad’s Gold and Jewelry Innovation Ecosystem," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8231-8261, June.
    10. Arigapudi, Srinivas & Heller, Yuval & Schreiber, Amnon, 2021. "Sampling Dynamics and Stable Mixing in Hawk–Dove Games," MPRA Paper 108819, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Samuel Amponsah Odei & Jan Stejskal & Viktor Prokop, 2021. "Understanding territorial innovations in European regions: Insights from radical and incremental innovative firms," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 1638-1660, October.
    12. Kiman Kim & Sang Ok Choi & Sooyeon Lee, 2021. "The Effect of a Financial Support on Firm Innovation Collaboration and Output: Does Policy Work on the Diverse Nature of Firm Innovation?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 645-675, June.
    13. Roberto Alvarez & Miguel A. Gonzalez, 2023. "Obstacles to Green Innovation: Evidence from Chilean Firms," Working Papers wp550, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    14. Mael Jambou & Andre Torre & Sabrina Dermine-Brullot & Sébastien Bourdin, 2022. "Inter-firm cooperation and local industrial ecology processes: evidence from three French case studies," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(2), pages 331-358, April.
    15. Changhua Liao & Qihui Lu & Ying Shui, 2022. "Governmental Anti-Pandemic and Subsidy Strategies for Blockchain-Enabled Food Supply Chains in the Post-Pandemic Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, August.
    16. Xiaojiao Qiao & Shimeng Xu & Dan Shi & Xiukun Zhao, 2023. "Data-Driven Sustainable Supply Chain Decision Making in the Presence of Low Carbon Awareness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Youqing Lv & Guojian Ma & Juan Ding, 2022. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Medical Waste Disposal in China under Different Reward and Penalty Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    18. André Luis Rossoni & Eduardo Pinheiro Gondim Vasconcellos & Renata Luiza Castilho Rossoni, 2024. "Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 1841-1877, September.
    19. Qian, Jia-Li & Zhou, Yin-Xiang & Hao, Qing-Yi, 2024. "The emergence of cooperative behavior based on random payoff and heterogeneity of concerning social image," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    20. Jonathan Newton, 2018. "Evolutionary Game Theory: A Renaissance," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-67, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:22:p:15197-:d:976033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.