IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14267-d959859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Digital Technology as a Collaborative Tool among Nursing Students—Survey Study and Validation

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Fischer-Suárez

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almeria, Spain
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Torrecárdenas Universitary Hospital, 04009 Almeria, Spain)

  • David Lozano-Paniagua

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almeria, Spain)

  • Jessica García-González

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almeria, Spain)

  • Gracia Castro-Luna

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almeria, Spain)

  • Mar Requena-Mullor

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almeria, Spain)

  • Raquel Alarcón-Rodríguez

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almeria, Spain)

  • Tesifón Parrón-Carreño

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almeria, Spain
    Andalusian Council of Health and Families at Almería Province, 04005 Almeria, Spain)

  • Bruno José Nievas-Soriano

    (Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Medicine, University of Almería, 04120 Almeria, Spain)

Abstract

Background: This research aimed to develop a questionnaire to analyze perceived aspects of using digital technology among nursing students as a collaborative tool. We further sought to evaluate the psychometric reliability of the instrument. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was performed using a questionnaire developed from scratch. Psychometric studies and univariate and bivariate analyses were performed. Results: 132 nursing students participated. The exploratory and confirmatory analyses of the questionnaire excluded 4 of the initial 18 items and established four domains, and internal consistency was found. The mean global score of the answers to the questionnaire was 4.67 on a scale of 1–5 points, and all the domains obtained high scores. Men scored higher on the usefulness and the global score, while no differences were found regarding age. Conclusions: Nursing students positively assess the use of digital technology as a collaborative tool, regardless of age. Digital technology as a collaborative tool is perceived as beneficial, improves their involvement, and allows nursing students to obtain a better knowledge of their partners. These findings can help develop group projects and tools based on technology to train future nursing professionals. The questionnaire developed is a valid tool to assess this.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Fischer-Suárez & David Lozano-Paniagua & Jessica García-González & Gracia Castro-Luna & Mar Requena-Mullor & Raquel Alarcón-Rodríguez & Tesifón Parrón-Carreño & Bruno José Nievas-Soriano, 2022. "Use of Digital Technology as a Collaborative Tool among Nursing Students—Survey Study and Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14267-:d:959859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14267/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14267/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruno José Nievas Soriano & Sonia García Duarte & Ana María Fernández Alonso & Antonio Bonillo Perales & Tesifón Parrón Carreño, 2020. "Validation of a Questionnaire Developed to Evaluate a Pediatric eHealth Website for Parents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Jang, Moonkyoung & Aavakare, Milla & Nikou, Shahrokh & Kim, Seongcheol, 2021. "The impact of literacy on intention to use digital technology for learning: A comparative study of Korea and Finland," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(7).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mónica Rojas-Chaves & Manuel Lucas-Matheu & Gracia Castro-Luna & Tesifón Parrón-Carreño & Bruno José Nievas-Soriano, 2022. "Validation of a Scale on Society’s Attitudes towards the Sexuality of Women with Intellectual Disabilities—Survey Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-10, October.
    2. Hamiza Ngah & Suhaily Mohd Hairon & Nurul Ainun Hamzah & Shahronizam Noordin & Mohd Nazri Shafei, 2022. "Development and Validation of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Questionnaire: Toward Safe Working in Confined Spaces," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Mohammad Mulayh Alshammari & Yaser Hasan Al-Mamary & Aliyu Alhaji Abubakar, 2024. "Revolutionizing education: unleashing the power of social media in Saudi Arabian public universities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Nam, Jinyoung & Kim, Seongcheol, 2022. "Why do elderly people feel negative about the use of self-service technology and how do they cope with the negative emotions?," 31st European Regional ITS Conference, Gothenburg 2022: Reining in Digital Platforms? Challenging monopolies, promoting competition and developing regulatory regimes 265661, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Gaspare D’Amico & Roberta Arbolino & Lei Shi & Tan Yigitcanlar & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2021. "Digital Technologies for Urban Metabolism Efficiency: Lessons from Urban Agenda Partnership on Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Choe, Hyoung-Seon & Yang, Chang-Gyu & Jun, Sung-Youl & Lee, Sang-Gun, 2023. "A study on forward and backward linkage effects in South Korea's telecom industry across generations," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14267-:d:959859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.