IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i21p14129-d957358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Comprehensive, General Health Literacy in the General Adult Population: The Development and Validation of the HLS 19 -Q12 Instrument in Seventeen Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Jürgen M. Pelikan

    (Competence Centre for Health Promotion and Health System, Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
    HLS 19 International Coordination Center at the Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria)

  • Thomas Link

    (Department of Quality Measurement and Patient Survey, Austrian National Public Health Institute, and HLS 19 International Coordination Center at the Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria)

  • Christa Straßmayr

    (Competence Centre for Health Promotion and Health System, Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
    HLS 19 International Coordination Center at the Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria)

  • Karin Waldherr

    (Ferdinand Porsche FernFH, A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria)

  • Tobias Alfers

    (Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany)

  • Henrik Bøggild

    (Public Health and Epidemiology, Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
    Unit of Clinical Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark)

  • Robert Griebler

    (Competence Centre for Health Promotion and Health System, Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
    HLS 19 International Coordination Center at the Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria)

  • Maria Lopatina

    (National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 101000 Moscow, Russia)

  • Dominika Mikšová

    (Department of Quality Measurement and Patient Survey, Austrian National Public Health Institute, and HLS 19 International Coordination Center at the Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria)

  • Marie Germund Nielsen

    (Public Health and Epidemiology, Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
    Clinical Nursing Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark)

  • Sandra Peer

    (Institute for Water Quality and Resource Management, TU Wien, A-1040 Vienna, Austria)

  • Mitja Vrdelja

    (National Institute of Public Health, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Background: For improving health literacy (HL) by national and international public health policy, measuring population HL by a comprehensive instrument is needed. A short instrument, the HLS 19 -Q12 based on the HLS-EU-Q47, was developed, translated, applied, and validated in 17 countries in the WHO European Region. Methods: For factorial validity/dimensionality, Cronbach alphas, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Rasch model (RM), and Partial Credit Model (PCM) were used. For discriminant validity, correlation analysis, and for concurrent predictive validity, linear regression analysis were carried out. Results: The Cronbach alpha coefficients are above 0.7. The fit indices for the single-factor CFAs indicate a good model fit. Some items show differential item functioning in certain country data sets. The regression analyses demonstrate an association of the HLS 19 -Q12 score with social determinants and selected consequences of HL. The HLS 19 -Q12 score correlates sufficiently highly (r ≥ 0.897) with the equivalent score for the HLS 19 -Q47 long form. Conclusions: The HLS 19 -Q12, based on a comprehensive understanding of HL, shows acceptable psychometric and validity characteristics for different languages, country contexts, and methods of data collection, and is suitable for measuring HL in general, national, adult populations. There are also indications for further improvement of the instrument.

Suggested Citation

  • Jürgen M. Pelikan & Thomas Link & Christa Straßmayr & Karin Waldherr & Tobias Alfers & Henrik Bøggild & Robert Griebler & Maria Lopatina & Dominika Mikšová & Marie Germund Nielsen & Sandra Peer & Mitj, 2022. "Measuring Comprehensive, General Health Literacy in the General Adult Population: The Development and Validation of the HLS 19 -Q12 Instrument in Seventeen Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-31, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14129-:d:957358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/21/14129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geoff Masters, 1982. "A rasch model for partial credit scoring," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 149-174, June.
    2. Ivo Ponocny, 2001. "Nonparametric goodness-of-fit tests for the rasch model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 437-459, September.
    3. Erling Andersen, 1973. "A goodness of fit test for the rasch model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 123-140, March.
    4. Tuyen Van Duong & Thao T. P. Nguyen & Khue M. Pham & Kien T. Nguyen & Manh H. Giap & Tung D. X. Tran & Chi X. Nguyen & Shwu-Huey Yang & Chien-Tien Su, 2019. "Validation of the Short-Form Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLS-SF12) and Its Determinants among People Living in Rural Areas in Vietnam," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-11, September.
    5. Chalmers, R. Philip, 2012. "mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i06).
    6. Gerhard Fischer, 1981. "On the existence and uniqueness of maximum-likelihood estimates in the Rasch model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 59-77, March.
    7. Rob Eisinga & Manfred Grotenhuis & Ben Pelzer, 2013. "The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(4), pages 637-642, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andreia Costa & Rodrigo Feteira-Santos & Violeta Alarcão & Adriana Henriques & Teresa Madeira & Ana Virgolino & Miguel Arriaga & Paulo J. Nogueira, 2023. "Health Literacy among Older Adults in Portugal and Associated Sociodemographic, Health and Healthcare-Related Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-16, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georg Gittler & Gerhard Fischer, 2011. "IRT-Based Measurement of Short-Term Changes of Ability, With an Application to Assessing the “Mozart Effectâ€," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 36(1), pages 33-75, February.
    2. Clemens Draxler, 2010. "Sample Size Determination for Rasch Model Tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 75(4), pages 708-724, December.
    3. Clemens Draxler & Andreas Kurz & Can Gürer & Jan Philipp Nolte, 2024. "An Improved Inferential Procedure to Evaluate Item Discriminations in a Conditional Maximum Likelihood Framework," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(3), pages 403-430, June.
    4. Timo Bechger & Gunter Maris, 2015. "A Statistical Test for Differential Item Pair Functioning," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 317-340, June.
    5. Clemens Draxler & Rainer Alexandrowicz, 2015. "Sample Size Determination Within the Scope of Conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Special Focus on Testing the Rasch Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(4), pages 897-919, December.
    6. Luo, Nanyu & Ji, Feng & Han, Yuting & He, Jinbo & Zhang, Xiaoya, 2024. "Fitting item response theory models using deep learning computational frameworks," OSF Preprints tjxab, Center for Open Science.
    7. David J. Hessen, 2023. "Fitting and Testing Log-Linear Subpopulation Models with Known Support," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 917-939, September.
    8. C. Glas & Anna Dagohoy, 2007. "A Person Fit Test For Irt Models For Polytomous Items," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(2), pages 159-180, June.
    9. Joakim Wallmark & James O. Ramsay & Juan Li & Marie Wiberg, 2024. "Analyzing Polytomous Test Data: A Comparison Between an Information-Based IRT Model and the Generalized Partial Credit Model," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 49(5), pages 753-779, October.
    10. Clemens Draxler, 2018. "Bayesian conditional inference for Rasch models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 102(2), pages 245-262, April.
    11. Gerhard Tutz & Gunther Schauberger, 2015. "A Penalty Approach to Differential Item Functioning in Rasch Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 21-43, March.
    12. Robert Zwitser & Gunter Maris, 2015. "Conditional Statistical Inference with Multistage Testing Designs," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 65-84, March.
    13. Jan deLeeuw & Dorota Dabrowska & Norbert Tanzer & Leo Kamp, 1987. "Reviews," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 52(1), pages 151-160, March.
    14. Clemens Draxler & Andreas Kurz, 2021. "Conditional Inference in Small Sample Scenarios Using a Resampling Approach," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-13, October.
    15. Laura Maldonado-Murciano & Halley M. Pontes & Mark D. Griffiths & Maite Barrios & Juana Gómez-Benito & Georgina Guilera, 2020. "The Spanish Version of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form (IGDS9-SF): Further Examination Using Item Response Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-14, September.
    16. Luo, Nanyu & Ji, Feng & Han, Yuting & He, Jinbo & Zhang, Xiaoya, 2024. "Fitting item response theory models using deep learning computational frameworks," OSF Preprints tjxab_v1, Center for Open Science.
    17. Wenjia Wang & Mickaël Guedj & Viviane Bertrand & Julie Foucquier & Elisabeth Jouve & Daniel Commenges & Cécile Proust-Lima & Niall P Murphy & Olivier Blin & Laurent Magy & Daniel Cohen & Shahram Attar, 2017. "A Rasch Analysis of the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Score (CMTNS) in a Cohort of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 1A Patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, January.
    18. Rikkert M. van der Lans & Ridwan Maulana & Michelle Helms-Lorenz & Carmen-María Fernández-García & Seyeoung Chun & Thelma de Jager & Yulia Irnidayanti & Mercedes Inda-Caro & Okhwa Lee & Thys Coetze, 2021. "Student Perceptions of Teaching Quality in Five Countries: A Partial Credit Model Approach to Assess Measurement Invariance," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    19. Sara Fernandes & Guillaume Fond & Xavier Zendjidjian & Pierre Michel & Karine Baumstarck & Christophe Lançon & Ludovic Samalin & Pierre-Michel Llorca & Magali Coldefy & Pascal Auquier & Laurent Boyer , 2022. "Development and Calibration of the PREMIUM Item Bank for Measuring Respect and Dignity for Patients with Severe Mental Illness," Post-Print hal-03649277, HAL.
    20. Felix Zimmer & Clemens Draxler & Rudolf Debelak, 2023. "Power Analysis for the Wald, LR, Score, and Gradient Tests in a Marginal Maximum Likelihood Framework: Applications in IRT," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 88(4), pages 1249-1298, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:21:p:14129-:d:957358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.