IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12787-d935080.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Item Response Theory Analysis of the Dark Factor of Personality Scale for College Students in China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyi Wang

    (Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Shiyi Zhang

    (Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Tao Xin

    (Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

The Dark Factor of Personality (D) describes the common core of dark traits and is a stable indicator for socially aversive behaviors. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Dark Factor of Personality Scale for college students using item response theory (IRT). A total of 762 students—251 males and 511 females ( M = 19.99, SD = 1.30)—were recruited. Item response theory methods were utilized to evaluate the properties of the scale. Four items with poor item properties were excluded, obtaining a final 28-item scale (D28-C) that included highly discriminative items showing high measurement precision in various levels of the D factor. Furthermore, a test of differential item functioning (DIF) by gender was conducted. The result indicated that the scale as a whole could be seen as gender invariant. Lastly, according to the detailed information provided by IRT and the content of items, a reliable short form of the D28-C comprising 15 items was obtained. The study enriched the existing knowledge of the dark factor of personality in the Chinese background and made some revisions to the corresponding scale to make it a more reliable tool for measurement in China. In addition, the shortened version of the scale based on item information and content helps to improve the efficiency of the measurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyi Wang & Shiyi Zhang & Tao Xin, 2022. "Item Response Theory Analysis of the Dark Factor of Personality Scale for College Students in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12787-:d:935080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12787/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12787/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Po-Hsien Huang, 2017. "Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 82(2), pages 407-426, June.
    2. Ángel Castro & Juan Ramón Barrada & Pedro J. Ramos-Villagrasa & Elena Fernández-del-Río, 2020. "Profiling Dating Apps Users: Sociodemographic and Personality Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Ramón Barrada & Ángel Castro, 2020. "Tinder Users: Sociodemographic, Psychological, and Psychosexual Characteristics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Ahmed,Tanima & Lebbos,Toni Joe & Howell,Sean & Lamontagne,Erik & Wimpey,Joshua Seth, 2022. "Impacts of COVID-19 on the Income and Mental Well-Being of Cismen, Ciswomen, Transgender, andNon-Binary Individuals : Evidence from the 2020 COVID-19 Disparities Survey," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10184, The World Bank.
    3. Nobel, Anne & Lizin, Sebastien & Witters, Nele & Rineau, Francois & Malina, Robert, 2020. "The impact of wildfires on the recreational value of heathland: A discrete factor approach with adjustment for on-site sampling," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    4. Anna Szép & Slava Dantchev & Martina Zemp & Malte Schwinger & Mira-Lynn Chavanon & Hanna Christiansen, 2021. "Facilitators and Barriers of Teachers’ Use of Effective Classroom Management Strategies for Students with ADHD: A Model Analysis Based on Teachers’ Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Michele Roccato & Nicoletta Cavazza & Pasquale Colloca & Silvia Russo, 2020. "Three Roads to Populism? An Italian Field Study on the 2019 European Election," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 101(4), pages 1222-1235, July.
    6. Henseler, Jörg & Schuberth, Florian, 2020. "Using confirmatory composite analysis to assess emergent variables in business research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 147-156.
    7. Maycon Klerystton B. Tavares & Romulo L. P. de Melo & Bianca F. da Rocha & Débora J. Andrade & Danielle R. Evangelista & Márcia C. T. S. Peres & Leonardo R. Baldaçara & Thiago DeSouza-Vieira & Elisang, 2020. "Dating Applications, Sexual Behaviors, and Attitudes of College Students in Brazil’s Legal Amazon," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-10, October.
    8. Ángel Castro & Juan Ramón Barrada, 2020. "Dating Apps and Their Sociodemographic and Psychosocial Correlates: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Ana Fonseca & Jorge Osma, 2021. "Using Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) for Mental Health Prevention and Treatment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-5, January.
    10. Angel Castro & José David Moreno & Berta Maté & Javier Ibáñez-Vidal & Juan Ramón Barrada, 2021. "Profiling Children Sexual Abuse in a Sample of University Students: A Study on Characteristic of Victims, Abusers, and Abuse Episodes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-9, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12787-:d:935080. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.