IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i18p11530-d913854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landscape Changes and Optimization in an Ecological Red Line Area: A Case Study in the Upper Reaches of the Ganjiang River

Author

Listed:
  • Guangxu Liu

    (School of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Aicun Xiang

    (School of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Yimin Huang

    (School of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Wen Zha

    (School of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Yaofang Chen

    (School of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China)

  • Benjin Mao

    (School of Geography and Environmental Engineering, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China)

Abstract

The key to optimizing ecological management is to study the spatial configuration of the landscape and the dynamic changes and their driving mechanisms at the landscape scale. The ecological red line area in the hilly area of the upper reaches of the Ganjiang River was chosen as the research area in this study. Based on the theory of landscape ecology and the evolution of biological communities, a multiscale coupling model was adopted and combined with remote sensing (RS) and geographical information system (GIS) technologies to systematically study the evolution of key landscape ecosystems such as forests, patch characteristics, and changes in diversity. The study revealed that: (1) forests represented the largest proportion in the study area, followed by croplands and grasslands; (2) the biological community tended to progress toward climax between 1986 and 1995, but then it moved toward regressive successions between 1995 and 2005 before recovering; (3) the study area was characterized by a high proportion of dominant ecosystems, most of which were at their climax with stable ecological species groups, and which were connected by ecological corridors; and (4) during the period from 1995 to 2010, most landscapes showed a trend of fragmentation. However, during the period from 2010 to 2018, the forest patches were gradually connected. The proportion of dominant landscapes increased, and the landscape uniformity was reduced. Based on the findings, we proposed an ecosystem management strategy that includes strengthening crop management, focusing on the natural restoration of the ecosystems and the cultivation of large patches, exploring disturbances due to mining activities, and applying methods to mitigate damage to and optimize the ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangxu Liu & Aicun Xiang & Yimin Huang & Wen Zha & Yaofang Chen & Benjin Mao, 2022. "Landscape Changes and Optimization in an Ecological Red Line Area: A Case Study in the Upper Reaches of the Ganjiang River," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11530-:d:913854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11530/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/18/11530/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Xibao & Tan, Yan & Yang, Guishan & Barnett, Jon, 2018. "China’s ambitious ecological red lines," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 447-451.
    2. Tao Wu & Peipei Zha & Mengjie Yu & Guojun Jiang & Jianzhen Zhang & Qinglong You & Xuefeng Xie, 2021. "Landscape Pattern Evolution and Its Response to Human Disturbance in a Newly Metropolitan Area: A Case Study in Jin-Yi Metropolitan Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, July.
    3. Yang Bai & Christina P. Wong & Bo Jiang & Alice C. Hughes & Min Wang & Qing Wang, 2018. "Developing China’s Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaojia Liu & Xi Chen & Yan Huang & Weihong Wang & Mingkan Zhang & Yang Jin, 2023. "Landscape Aesthetic Value of Waterfront Green Space Based on Space–Psychology–Behavior Dimension: A Case Study along Qiantang River (Hangzhou Section)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Xupeng Zhang & Xinhai Lu & Danling Chen & Chaozheng Zhang & Kun Ge & Bing Kuang & Sui Liu, 2021. "Is environmental regulation a blessing or a curse for China's urban land use efficiency? Evidence from a threshold effect model," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 265-282, March.
    3. Liang-Jie Wang & Shuai Ma & Yong-Peng Qiao & Jin-Chi Zhang, 2020. "Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-26, October.
    4. Huirong Yu, 2022. "A multi-scale approach to mapping conservation priorities for rural China based on landscape context," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 10803-10828, September.
    5. Liang, Xinyuan & Jin, Xiaobin & He, Jie & Wang, Xiaorui & Xu, Cuilan & Qiao, Guoliang & Zhang, Xiaolin & Zhou, Yinkang, 2022. "Impacts of land management practice strategy on regional ecosystems: Enlightenment from ecological redline adjustment in Jiangsu, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Shuming Ma & Jie Huang & Yingying Chai, 2021. "Proposing a GEE-Based Spatiotemporally Adjusted Value Transfer Method to Assess Land-Use Changes and Their Impacts on Ecosystem Service Values in the Shenyang Metropolitan Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Xiaoyong Li & Wenhui Kuang & Fengyun Sun, 2020. "Identifying Urban Flood Regulation Priority Areas in Beijing Based on an Ecosystem Services Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Xie, Yu & Chen, Zhen & Boadu, Francis & Tang, HongJuan, 2022. "How does digital transformation affect agricultural enterprises’ pro-land behavior: The role of environmental protection cognition and cross-border search," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Qiongrui Zhang & Xuechao Sun & Kebin Zhang & Zhenni Liao & Songjun Xu, 2021. "Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in the Pearl River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Hongwei Guo & Ji Han & Lili Qian & Xinxin Long & Xiaoyin Sun, 2022. "Assessing the Potential Impacts of Urban Expansion on Hydrological Ecosystem Services in a Rapidly Urbanizing Lake Basin in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Li Li & Yonghui Li & Lan Yang & Ying Liang & Wenliang Zhao & Guanyu Chen, 2022. "How Does Topography Affect the Value of Ecosystem Services? An Empirical Study from the Qihe Watershed," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Xi Chen & Dawei Xu & Safa Fadelelseed & Lianying Li, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Analysis and Control of Landscape Eco-Security at the Urban Fringe in Shrinking Resource Cities: A Case Study in Daqing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-26, November.
    13. Huan Wang & Chao Zhang & Li Li & Wenju Yun & Jiani Ma & Lulu Gao, 2021. "Delimitating the Ecological Spaces for Water Conservation Services in Jilin Province of China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Yang Bai & Yi Zhou & Juha M. Alatalo & Alice C. Hughes, 2020. "Changes in Air Quality during the First-Level Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic in Shanghai Municipality, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-12, October.
    15. Minghui Ou & Yexi Zhong & Hongzhi Ma & Wenhui Wang & Manyu Bi, 2022. "Impacts of Policy-Driven Transformation in the Livelihoods of Fishermen on Agricultural Landscape Patterns: A Case Study of a Fishing Village, Island of Poyang Lake," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Mengzhu Liu & Leilei Min & Jingjing Zhao & Yanjun Shen & Hongwei Pei & Hongjuan Zhang & Yali Li, 2021. "The Impact of Land Use Change on Water-Related Ecosystem Services in the Bashang Area of Hebei Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Ziqi Meng & Jinwei Dong & Erle C. Ellis & Graciela Metternicht & Yuanwei Qin & Xiao-Peng Song & Sara Löfqvist & Rachael D. Garrett & Xiaopeng Jia & Xiangming Xiao, 2023. "Post-2020 biodiversity framework challenged by cropland expansion in protected areas," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(7), pages 758-768, July.
    18. Hengyu Pan & Yong Geng & Ji Han & Cheng Huang & Wenyi Han & Zhuang Miao, 2020. "Emergy Based Decoupling Analysis of Ecosystem Services on Urbanization: A Case of Shanghai, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    19. Lingfan Ju & Yan Liu & Jin Yang & Mingshun Xiang & Qing Xiang & Wenkai Hu & Zhengyi Ding, 2023. "Construction of Nature Reserves’ Ecological Security Pattern Based on Landscape Ecological Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Garze Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, May.
    20. Bo Jiang & Yuanyuan Chen & Yang Bai & Xibao Xu, 2019. "Supply–Demand Coupling Mechanisms for Policy Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-8, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:18:p:11530-:d:913854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.