IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p10336-d892579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fostering Green Innovation Adoption through Green Dynamic Capability: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism and Big Data Analytic Capability

Author

Listed:
  • Danni Yu

    (School of Business & Economics, University of Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
    School of Economics and Management, Shandong Youth University of Political Science, Jinan 250103, China)

  • Shen Tao

    (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Abdul Hanan

    (National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore 54000, Pakistan)

  • Tze San Ong

    (School of Business & Economics, University of Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
    Department of Business Administration, Daffodil International University, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh)

  • Badar Latif

    (School of Business & Economics, University of Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Malaysia)

  • Mohsin Ali

    (Department of Commerce, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 40000, Pakistan)

Abstract

Though the concept of green dynamic capability has been increasingly gaining traction among academics, practitioners, and policymakers, its association with green innovation adoption remains unclear. The present study addresses this gap and aims to provide clarity by distinguishing green innovation adoption in the context of developing countries. Drawing on dynamic capability and stakeholder theory, this research shed light on the significance of green dynamic capability for green innovation adoption. Additionally, this study examines the moderating role of environmental dynamism and big data analytics capability in the link between green dynamic capability and green innovation adoption. Adopting a two-wave research design, the sample for this study contained SMEs from Pakistan and Malaysia. Data was obtained from 220 SMEs (105 from Pakistan, 115 from Malaysia). To test the hypotheses, covariance-based structural equation modelling was performed to analyze causal relationships in the model, by using AMOS 23 software. The results showed that green dynamic capability positively impacts green innovation adoption, but environmental dynamism does not positively moderate between green dynamic capability and green innovation adoption. In addition, big data analytics capability positively moderates between green dynamic capability and green innovation adoption. We believe that this study opens a new avenue in the environmental literature under which green innovation adoption is useful for SMEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Danni Yu & Shen Tao & Abdul Hanan & Tze San Ong & Badar Latif & Mohsin Ali, 2022. "Fostering Green Innovation Adoption through Green Dynamic Capability: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism and Big Data Analytic Capability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-20, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10336-:d:892579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10336/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10336/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanjay Kumar Singh & Manlio Del Giudice & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Hengky Latan & Amrik Singh Sohal, 2022. "Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 500-514, January.
    2. Zhijun Feng & Wei Chen, 2018. "Environmental Regulation, Green Innovation, and Industrial Green Development: An Empirical Analysis Based on the Spatial Durbin Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Fengyan Wang & Ziyuan Sun, 2022. "Does the Environmental Regulation Intensity and ESG Performance Have a Substitution Effect on the Impact of Enterprise Green Innovation: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-24, July.
    4. Nelson, Richard R. & Nelson, Katherine, 2002. "Technology, institutions, and innovation systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 265-272, February.
    5. Lin, Canchu & Kunnathur, Anand, 2019. "Strategic orientations, developmental culture, and big data capability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 49-60.
    6. Roy L. Simerly & Mingfang Li, 2000. "Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: a theoretical integration and an empirical test," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 31-49, January.
    7. Badar Latif & Zeeshan Mahmood & Ong Tze San & Ridzwana Mohd Said & Allah Bakhsh, 2020. "Coercive, Normative and Mimetic Pressures as Drivers of Environmental Management Accounting Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Rosa Maria Dangelico & Devashish Pujari & Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo, 2017. "Green Product Innovation in Manufacturing Firms: A Sustainability‐Oriented Dynamic Capability Perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 490-506, May.
    9. Jianming Zhang & Gongqian Liang & Taiwen Feng & Chunlin Yuan & Wenbo Jiang, 2020. "Green innovation to respond to environmental regulation: How external knowledge adoption and green absorptive capacity matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 39-53, January.
    10. Xiaojun Sun & Jing Tang & Shilong Li, 2022. "Promote Green Innovation in Manufacturing Enterprises in the Aspect of Government Subsidies in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Waris Ali & Yu Danni & Badar Latif & Rehana Kouser & Saleh Baqader, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Customer Loyalty in Food Chains—Mediating Role of Customer Satisfaction and Corporate Reputation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Freeman, R. Edward, 1994. "The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions1," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 409-421, October.
    13. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Chen, Jin & Del Giudice, Manlio & El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser, 2019. "Environmental ethics, environmental performance, and competitive advantage: Role of environmental training," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 203-211.
    14. Ching-Hsun Chang, 2011. "The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 361-370, December.
    15. Usama Awan & Andrzej Kraslawski & Janne Huiskonen, 2018. "Governing Interfirm Relationships for Social Sustainability: The Relationship between Governance Mechanisms, Sustainable Collaboration, and Cultural Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Shi-Zheng Huang & Ka Yin Chau & Fengsheng Chien & Huawen Shen, 2020. "The Impact of Startups’ Dual Learning on Their Green Innovation Capability: The Effects of Business Executives’ Environmental Awareness and Environmental Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    17. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    18. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    19. Sebastian Kobarg & Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim & Christopher Schlägel & Isabell M. Welpe, 2020. "Green together? The effects of companies’ innovation collaboration with different partner types on ecological process and product innovation," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(9), pages 953-990, October.
    20. Kunapatarawong, Rasi & Martínez-Ros, Ester, 2016. "Towards green growth: How does green innovation affect employment?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1218-1232.
    21. Badar Latif & Tze San Ong & Abdelrhman Meero & Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman & Mohsin Ali, 2022. "Employee-Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Employee Pro-Environmental Behavior (PEB): The Moderating Role of CSR Skepticism and CSR Authenticity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    22. Xinpeng Xing & Tiansen Liu & Lin Shen & Jianhua Wang, 2020. "Linking Environmental Regulation and Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Dynamic Capability and Sustainable Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    23. Sohail Ahmad Javeed & Boon Heng Teh & Tze San Ong & Lee Lee Chong & Mohd Fairuz Bin Abd Rahim & Rashid Latief, 2022. "How Does Green Innovation Strategy Influence Corporate Financing? Corporate Social Responsibility and Gender Diversity Play a Moderating Role," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-22, July.
    24. Yuan, Baolong & Cao, Xueyun, 2022. "Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    25. Lu Qiu & Xiaowen Jie & Yanan Wang & Minjuan Zhao, 2020. "Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 146-165, January.
    26. Yu-Hsien Lin & Yu-Shan Chen, 2017. "Determinants of green competitive advantage: the roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1663-1685, July.
    27. Mert Gürlek & Muharrem Tuna, 2018. "Reinforcing competitive advantage through green organizational culture and green innovation," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7-8), pages 467-491, June.
    28. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang, 2013. "The Determinants of Green Product Development Performance: Green Dynamic Capabilities, Green Transformational Leadership, and Green Creativity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 116(1), pages 107-119, August.
    29. Ensley, Michael D. & Pearce, Craig L. & Hmieleski, Keith M., 2006. "The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between entrepreneur leadership behavior and new venture performance," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 243-263, March.
    30. Kim, Bora & Lee, Seoki, 2022. "The impact of celebrity CEOs on restaurant firm performance: The moderating role of environmental dynamism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 869-880.
    31. Chan, Hing Kai & Yee, Rachel W.Y. & Dai, Jing & Lim, Ming K., 2016. "The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PB), pages 384-391.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ziyuan Sun & Xiao Sun & Yuting Dong, 2024. "Does negative environmental performance feedback induce substantive green innovation? The moderating roles of external regulations and internal incentive," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 2953-2976, July.
    2. Emily Opoku Aboagye-Dapaah & Michael Karikari Appiah & Joshua Caleb Dagadu, 2024. "Smart Manufacturing and Pro-Environmental Behavior: Moderated Serial Mediation Modelling and Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Jinqiu He & Huiwen Su, 2022. "Digital Transformation and Green Innovation of Chinese Firms: The Moderating Role of Regulatory Pressure and International Opportunities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Shuang Meng & Pengxiang Wang & Jiajie Yu, 2022. "Going Abroad and Going Green: The Effects of Top Management Teams’ Overseas Experience on Green Innovation in the Digital Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Fenfen Ma & Shah Fahad & Shuxi Yan & Yapeng Zhang, 2023. "Digital Transformation and Corporate Environmental Green Innovation Nexus: An Approach towards Green Innovation Improvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Han Xiao & Abdullah Al Mamun & Mohammad Masukujjaman & Qing Yang, 2023. "Modelling the significance of strategic orientation on green innovation: mediation of green dynamic capabilities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Ge Zhang & Yuxiang Gao & Gaoyong Li, 2023. "Research on Digital Transformation and Green Technology Innovation—Evidence from China’s Listed Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Hao Zhang & Xin Sun & Kailong Dong & Lianghui Sui & Min Wang & Qiong Hong, 2022. "Green Innovation in Regional Logistics: Level Evaluation and Spatial Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Hongyi Mao & Jiang Lu, 2023. "Big Data Management Capabilities and Green Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-27, October.
    10. Yue, Xiao-Guang & Lu, Changyi & Pi, Saiqi & Huang, Hongyu & Manta, Otilia, 2024. "The role of mineral resources, sustainable finance, and innovation in promoting sustainable development under the IRA 2022," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Banji Rildwan Olaleye & Joseph Nembo Lekunze & Tsediso Joseph Sekhampu & Ntseliseng Khumalo & Adebanji Adejuwon William Ayeni, 2024. "Leveraging Innovation Capability and Organizational Resilience for Business Sustainability Among Small and Medium Enterprises: A PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Cai Li & Hazrat Hassan & Majid Murad & Farhan Mirza, 2023. "Role of Green Dynamic Capabilities on Environmental and Social Innovation Behavior: Mediating of Green Creativity and Moderating of Innovation Proclivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Raghuveer Negi & Amit Kumar Gupta & Vidhu Gaur, 2023. "Effect of green marketing orientation dimensions on green innovation and organizational performance: A mediation‐moderation analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5435-5458, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chotia, Varun & Cheng, Yue & Agarwal, Reeti & Vishnoi, Sushant Kumar, 2024. "AI-enabled Green Business Strategy: Path to carbon neutrality via environmental performance and green process innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Ying Guo, 2023. "External Knowledge Acquisition and Green Innovation in Chinese Firms: Unveiling the Impact of Green Dynamic Capabilities," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    3. Achi, Awele & Adeola, Ogechi & Achi, Francis Chukwuedo, 2022. "CSR and green process innovation as antecedents of micro, small, and medium enterprise performance: Moderating role of perceived environmental volatility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 771-781.
    4. Tu Thanh Hoai & Nha Nguyen Minh & Hien Vo Van & Nguyen Phong Nguyen, 2023. "Accounting going green: The move toward environmental sustainability in Vietnamese manufacturing firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1928-1941, July.
    5. Hongyi Mao & Jiang Lu, 2023. "Big Data Management Capabilities and Green Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Arnaldo Coelho & Jorge Ferreira & Catarina Proença, 2024. "The impact of green entrepreneurial orientation on sustainability performance through the effects of green product and process innovation: The moderating role of ambidexterity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3184-3202, May.
    7. Xinpeng Xing & Tiansen Liu & Lin Shen & Jianhua Wang, 2020. "Linking Environmental Regulation and Financial Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Dynamic Capability and Sustainable Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Yuan, Baolong & Cao, Xueyun, 2022. "Do corporate social responsibility practices contribute to green innovation? The mediating role of green dynamic capability," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Zhang Xiaoyi & Hailan Yang & Nilesh Kumar & Maqsood H. Bhutto & Wang Kun & Tianyang Hu, 2023. "Assessing Chinese Textile and Apparel Industry Business Sustainability: The Role of Organization Green Culture, Green Dynamic Capabilities, and Green Innovation in Relation to Environmental Orientatio," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Lu Qiu & Xiaowen Jie & Yanan Wang & Minjuan Zhao, 2020. "Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 146-165, January.
    11. Tariq, Adeel & Badir, Yuosre F. & Tariq, Waqas & Bhutta, Umair Saeed, 2017. "Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-23.
    12. Xuan Hung Nguyen & Khanh Linh Nguyen & Thi Van Ha Nguyen & Thi Thanh Huyen Nguyen & Van Loi Ta, 2023. "The Impact of Green Organizational Capabilities on Competitive Advantage of Construction Enterprises in Vietnam: The Mediating Role of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    13. John Wiredu & Qian Yang & Agyemang Kwasi Sampene & Bright Akwasi Gyamfi & Simplice A. Asongu, 2024. "The effect of green supply chain management practices on corporate environmental performance: Does supply chain competitive advantage matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2578-2599, March.
    14. Zahid Yousaf & Magdalena Radulescu & Crenguta Sinisi & Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Mohamed Haffar, 2022. "How Do Firms Achieve Green Innovation? Investigating the Influential Factors among the Energy Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Magdalena Pichlak, 2021. "The Drivers of Technological Eco-Innovation—Dynamic Capabilities and Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Khalid Mehmood & Pradeep Kautish & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Ahsan Ali & Yigit Kazancoglu, 2024. "Navigating a net‐zero economy future: Antecedents and consequences of net‐zero economy‐based green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4175-4197, July.
    17. Junaid Aftab & Nabila Abid & Huma Sarwar & Anam Amin & Mahsa Abedini & Monica Veneziani, 2024. "Does corporate social responsibility drive financial performance? Exploring the significance of green innovation, green dynamic capabilities, and perceived environmental volatility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1634-1653, May.
    18. Ge Zhang & Yuxiang Gao & Gaoyong Li, 2023. "Research on Digital Transformation and Green Technology Innovation—Evidence from China’s Listed Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    19. Xinwei Li & Wenjuan Zeng & Mao Xu, 2022. "The Moderating Role of IT Capability on Green Innovation and Ambidexterity: Towards a Corporate Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    20. Mercedes Úbeda‐García & Bartolome Marco‐Lajara & Patrocinio C. Zaragoza‐Sáez & Encarnación Manresa‐Marhuenda & Esther Poveda‐Pareja, 2022. "Green ambidexterity and environmental performance: The role of green human resources," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 32-45, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10336-:d:892579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.