IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p10138-d889488.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

US Adults’ Perceptions of Dog Breed Bans, Dog Aggression and Breed-Specific Laws

Author

Listed:
  • Lori R. Kogan

    (Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • Wendy Packman

    (Department of Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA)

  • Phyllis Erdman

    (College of Education, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99163, USA)

  • Jennifer Currin-McCulloch

    (School of Social Work, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • Cori Bussolari

    (Counseling Psychology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117, USA)

Abstract

Dog aggression directed towards people is a leading reason for relinquishment and a major public health hazard. In response to the threat of dog aggression and dog bites, breed-specific legislation has been introduced in numerous cities within the United States and countries throughout the world. There is limited evidence, however, to suggest that such laws are effective. This study explored, through an online, anonymous, cross-sectional survey, US residents’ views about the bite risk of common dog breeds, breed-specific legislation, and alternative options for improved public safety. A total of 586 surveys were completed by adult US residents, 48.8% female and 48.6% male. Approximately half of the respondents reported feeling that dog bites are a serious public health issue. Although 70% of respondents were opposed to a breed ban, only 56% felt that banning specific breeds creates an animal welfare issue. Females were less likely to support a ban or agree that specific breed bans improve public safety. When participants were asked to indicate their support of several alternatives to breed-specific legislation, the most frequently endorsed options included public education about animal welfare and animal behavior, and stricter leash laws. Further research pertaining to the most effective public education dissemination methods is warranted.

Suggested Citation

  • Lori R. Kogan & Wendy Packman & Phyllis Erdman & Jennifer Currin-McCulloch & Cori Bussolari, 2022. "US Adults’ Perceptions of Dog Breed Bans, Dog Aggression and Breed-Specific Laws," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10138-:d:889488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Finn Nilson & John Damsager & Jens Lauritsen & Carl Bonander, 2018. "The effect of breed-specific dog legislation on hospital treated dog bites in Odense, Denmark—A time series intervention study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-8, December.
    2. Lori R. Kogan & Regina M. Schoenfeld-Tacher & Peter W. Hellyer & James A. Oxley & Mark Rishniw, 2019. "Small Animal Veterinarians’ Perceptions, Experiences, and Views of Common Dog Breeds, Dog Aggression, and Breed-Specific Laws in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aubrey H. Fine, 2020. "The Psycho-Social Impact of Human-Animal Interactions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-4, June.
    2. Sara C. Owczarczak-Garstecka & Robert M. Christley & Francine Watkins & Huadong Yang & Carri Westgarth, 2021. "“ If You Don’t See the Dog, What Can You Do?” Using Procedures to Negotiate the Risk of Dog Bites in Occupational Contexts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Lori R. Kogan & Regina M. Schoenfeld-Tacher & Peter W. Hellyer & James A. Oxley & Mark Rishniw, 2019. "Small Animal Veterinarians’ Perceptions, Experiences, and Views of Common Dog Breeds, Dog Aggression, and Breed-Specific Laws in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Jan Náhlík & Petra Eretová & Helena Chaloupková & Hana Vostrá-Vydrová & Naděžda Fiala Šebková & Jan Trávníček, 2022. "How Parents Perceive the Potential Risk of a Child-Dog Interaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10138-:d:889488. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.