Author
Listed:
- Jan Náhlík
(Department of Animal Husbandry Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Studentská 1668, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic)
- Petra Eretová
(Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)
- Helena Chaloupková
(Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)
- Hana Vostrá-Vydrová
(Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)
- Naděžda Fiala Šebková
(Department of Ethology and Companion Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)
- Jan Trávníček
(Department of Animal Husbandry Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Studentská 1668, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic)
Abstract
Dog attacks on children are a widespread problem, which can occur when parents fail to realise a potentially dangerous interaction between a dog and a child. The aim of the study was to evaluate the ability of parents to identify dangerous situations from several everyday child–dog interactions and to determine whether the participants connected these situations to a particular breed of dog. Five sets of photographs depicting potentially dangerous interactions from everyday situations between children and three dogs (one of each breed) were presented via an online survey to parents of children no more than 6 years old. Data from 207 respondents were analysed using proc GLIMMIX in SAS program, version 9.3. The probability of risk assessment varied according to dog breed ( p < 0.001) as well as to the depicted situation ( p < 0.001). Results indicated that Labrador Retriever was considered the least likely of the three dogs to be involved in a dangerous dog-child interaction (with 49% predicting a dangerous interaction), followed by Parson Russell Terrier (63.2%) and American Pit Bull Terrier (65%). Participants considered one particular dog-child interaction named ‘touching a bowl’ a dangerous interaction at a high rate (77.9%) when compared with the other presented situations, which were assessed as dangerous at rates of 48.4% to 56.5%. The breed of dog seems to be an influential factor when assessing a potentially dangerous outcome from a dog-child interaction. Contrary to our hypothesis, interactions involving the small dog (Russell Terrier) were rated more critically, similarly to those of the Pit Bull Terrier. These results suggest that even popular family dog breeds, such as Labrador Retrievers, should be treated with more caution.
Suggested Citation
Jan Náhlík & Petra Eretová & Helena Chaloupková & Hana Vostrá-Vydrová & Naděžda Fiala Šebková & Jan Trávníček, 2022.
"How Parents Perceive the Potential Risk of a Child-Dog Interaction,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:1:p:564-:d:717910
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Aaron L. Davis & David C. Schwebel & Barbara A. Morrongiello & Julia Stewart & Melissa Bell, 2012.
"Dog Bite Risk: An Assessment of Child Temperament and Child-Dog Interactions,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.
- Lori R. Kogan & Regina M. Schoenfeld-Tacher & Peter W. Hellyer & James A. Oxley & Mark Rishniw, 2019.
"Small Animal Veterinarians’ Perceptions, Experiences, and Views of Common Dog Breeds, Dog Aggression, and Breed-Specific Laws in the United States,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-15, October.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Aubrey H. Fine, 2020.
"The Psycho-Social Impact of Human-Animal Interactions,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-4, June.
- Lori R. Kogan & Wendy Packman & Phyllis Erdman & Jennifer Currin-McCulloch & Cori Bussolari, 2022.
"US Adults’ Perceptions of Dog Breed Bans, Dog Aggression and Breed-Specific Laws,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:1:p:564-:d:717910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.