IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p10118-d889318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution and Driving Factors of the Spatiotemporal Pattern of Tourism Efficiency at the Provincial Level in China Based on SBM–DEA Model

Author

Listed:
  • Junli Gao

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China
    Shenzhen Academy of Environmental Sciences, No. 50, Honggui 1st Street, Luohu District, Shenzhen 518000, China)

  • Chaofeng Shao

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China)

  • Sihan Chen

    (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nankai University, 38 Tongyan Road, Jinnan District, Tianjin 300350, China)

Abstract

In order to give guidance to improve tourism competitiveness and sustainable development, it is particularly important to identify and analyze the factors and mechanisms that affect efficiency. The SBM–DEA model including undesirable outputs was used to measure the tourism efficiency of 30 provinces in China from 2006 to 2019. Combined with the compound DEA model, the sensitivity of each province to the fluctuation of the input–output index was mined. The exploratory spatial analysis method and fixed effect model were used to analyze the spatial change and driving factors of tourism efficiency. The results show that: (1) the tourism efficiency of each province in China fluctuated from 2006 to 2019, and the average value was raised from 0.12 to 0.71, generally reaching the grade of medium and high efficiency; (2) the spatial difference of tourism efficiency is significant, but there is no obvious spatial correlation; (3) the most important input factors to tourism efficiency are environmental resources, tourism resource inputs and tourism infrastructure construction, and tourism fixed asset investment is redundant. (4) Optimizing the industrial structure, strengthening the introduction of core technology, and continuously promoting the process of urbanization and marketization are important ways to improve the efficiency of tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Junli Gao & Chaofeng Shao & Sihan Chen, 2022. "Evolution and Driving Factors of the Spatiotemporal Pattern of Tourism Efficiency at the Provincial Level in China Based on SBM–DEA Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10118-:d:889318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10118/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10118/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Yi & Gong, Peichen & Ke, Jiesheng, 2021. "Development opportunities, forest use transition, and farmers' income differentiation: The impacts of Giant panda reserves in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    2. Junli Gao & Chaofeng Shao & Sihan Chen & Zizhang Wei, 2021. "Evaluation of Sustainable Development of Tourism Cities Based on SDGs and Tourism Competitiveness Index: Analysis of 221 Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    4. Wei, Quanling & Yan, Hong, 2004. "Congestion and returns to scale in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(3), pages 641-660, March.
    5. Stefan Felder & Horst Schmitt, 2004. "Data envelopment analysis based bonus payments," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 5(4), pages 357-364, November.
    6. Howitt, Oliver J.A. & Revol, Vincent G.N. & Smith, Inga J. & Rodger, Craig J., 2010. "Carbon emissions from international cruise ship passengers' travel to and from New Zealand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2552-2560, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Liu & Ziwei Wang & Changjin Li, 2023. "All-for-One Tourism Demonstration Zones and High-Quality Development of Tourism: Evidence from the Quasi-Natural Experiment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Huimin Song & Wei Zeng & Jamie M. Chen & Emily Ma, 2024. "COVID-19 Impacts on the Spatial Network of City Tourism in Fujian Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Wen Zhang & Rong Zhang & Yuntao Zou, 2024. "Urbanization and Cultural Industry Correlation: An Empirical Analysis from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-27, August.
    4. Jiayao Li & Rong Zhang & Yuntao Zou, 2024. "Analyzing the Shift in China’s Cultural Industries: From Economic Growth to Social Enrichment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Zi Tang & Xiaopeng Si & Yan Liang, 2024. "Research on the measurement of high-quality development of tourism: a case study of Heilongjiang Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 25027-25047, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehdiloozad, Mahmood & Zhu, Joe & Sahoo, Biresh K., 2018. "Identification of congestion in data envelopment analysis under the occurrence of multiple projections: A reliable method capable of dealing with negative data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 644-654.
    2. Zhang, Ganggang & Wu, Jie & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2020. "Performance evaluation and enrollment quota allocation for higher education institutions in China," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    3. Wu, Jie & An, Qingxian & Xiong, Beibei & Chen, Ya, 2013. "Congestion measurement for regional industries in China: A data envelopment analysis approach with undesirable outputs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 7-13.
    4. Maryam Shadab & Saber Saati & Reza Farzipoor Saen & Mohammad Khoveyni & Amin Mostafaee, 2021. "Detecting congestion in DEA by solving one model," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31, pages 77-96.
    5. Chen, Ci & Yan, Hong, 2011. "Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 147-155, August.
    6. Zhang, Yue-Jun & Liu, Jing-Yue & Su, Bin, 2020. "Carbon congestion effects in China's industry: Evidence from provincial and sectoral levels," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    7. Noor Ramli & Susila Munisamy & Behrouz Arabi, 2013. "Scale directional distance function and its application to the measurement of eco-efficiency in the manufacturing sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 211(1), pages 381-398, December.
    8. Yang, Zhuofan & Shi, Yong & Yan, Hong, 2017. "Analysis on pure e-commerce congestion effect, productivity effect and profitability in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 35-49.
    9. Ge, Maosheng & Wu, Pute & Zhu, Delan & Zhang, Lin & Cai, Yaohui, 2020. "Optimized configuration of a hose reel traveling irrigator," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    10. Kalinichenko, Olena & Amado, Carla A.F. & Santos, Sérgio P., 2022. "Exploring the potential of Data Envelopment Analysis for enhancing pay-for-performance programme design in primary health care," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 1084-1100.
    11. Gong, Shixin & Shao, Cheng & Zhu, Li, 2017. "Energy efficiency evaluation in ethylene production process with respect to operation classification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1370-1379.
    12. Pang, Qinghua & Qiu, Man & Zhang, Lina & Chiu, Yung-ho, 2023. "Congestion effects of energy and capital in China's carbon emission reduction: Evidence from provincial levels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    13. Jing Huang & Dongqian Xue, 2019. "Study on Temporal and Spatial Variation Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Land Use Efficiency in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-16, November.
    14. Wei, Quanling & Yan, Hong, 2009. "Weak congestion in output additive data envelopment analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 40-54, March.
    15. Maryam Shadab & Saber Saati & Reza Farzipoor Saen & Mohammad Khoveyni & Amin Mostafaee, 2021. "Detecting congestion in DEA by solving one model," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 31(1), pages 77-96.
    16. Ali Azadeh & Mansoureh Hasannia Kolaee & Vahid Salehi, 2016. "The impact of redundancy on resilience engineering in a petrochemical plant by data envelopment analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(3), pages 285-296, June.
    17. Alfonso Mendoza-Velázquez & Francisco Benita, 2019. "Efficiency, Productivity, and Congestion Performance: Analysis of the Automotive Cluster in Mexico," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 661-678, December.
    18. Xuanzhi Yang & Zhaofang Zhang & Wei Luo & Zhen Tang & Xin Gao & Zhongchi Wan & Xin Zhang, 2019. "The Impact of Government Role on High-Quality Innovation Development in Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Hu, Jin-Li & Chang, Ming-Chung & Tsay, Hui-Wen, 2017. "The congestion total-factor energy efficiency of regions in Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 710-718.
    20. Kao, Chiang, 2010. "Congestion measurement and elimination under the framework of data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 257-265, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10118-:d:889318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.